본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

언어 학습자로서의 신경망 언어모델: 영어 주어-동사 일치를 중심으로

A Neural Language Model as a Language Learner: Focusing on Subject-Verb Agreement

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper assesses the language-processing ability of the neural language model (L2-GPT-2) trained on data sets of English textbooks published in Korea using the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-2. Assuming that the language model (LM) is also an (artificial) language learner, we test it focusing on subject-verb agreement in English. It is a well-established fact that L1 speakers exhibit facilitatory interference effects in ungrammatical sentences with a plural subject and a singular form of verb. Unlike human native speakers, L2-GPT-2 as well as L1-GPT-2 display such effects in ungrammatical sentences either with a plural subject and a singular form of verb, or with a singular subject and a plural form of verb. Though there is a significant difference between human speakers and neural LMs in processing subject-verb agreement, the two LMs’ sensitivity to interference by a distractor NP points to the fact that they can attain a remarkably human-like linguistic generalization on subject-verb agreement.

Abstract

This paper assesses the language-processing ability of the neural language model (L2-GPT-2) trained on data sets of English textbooks published in Korea using the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-2. Assuming that the language model (LM) is also an (artificial) language learner, we test it focusing on subject-verb agreement in English. It is a well-established fact that L1 speakers exhibit facilitatory interference effects in ungrammatical sentences with a plural subject and a singular form of verb. Unlike human native speakers, L2-GPT-2 as well as L1-GPT-2 display such effects in ungrammatical sentences either with a plural subject and a singular form of verb, or with a singular subject and a plural form of verb. Though there is a significant difference between human speakers and neural LMs in processing subject-verb agreement, the two LMs’ sensitivity to interference by a distractor NP points to the fact that they can attain a remarkably human-like linguistic generalization on subject-verb agreement.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. Bernardy, Jean-Philippe, "Using deep neural networks to learn syntactic agreement", Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 15, pp.1~15 (2017)
  2. Bock, Kathryn, "Broken agreement", Cognitive Psychology, 23(1), pp.45~93 (1991)
  3. Clifton, C., "Feature manipulationins entence comprehension", Riv. Linguist, 11, pp.11~39 (1999)
  4. Dillon, Brian, "Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora : Experimental and modeling evidence", Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), pp.85~103 (2013)
  5. Drenhaus, H., "Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives", pp.145~165 (2005), deGruyter
  6. Eberhard, K. M., "Making syntax of sense : number agreement in sentence production", Psychological Review, 112, pp.531~539 (2005)
  7. Engelmann, Felix, "The effect of prominence and cue association in retrieval processes: A computational account", Cognitive Science Cognitive Science, 43, pp.e12800~ (2019)
  8. The determinants of retrieval interference in dependency resolution: Review and computational modeling, "Engelmann, Felix", Computer science, ~ (2015)
  9. Enguehard, Emile, "Exploring the syntactic abilities of RNNs with multi-task learning", arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03542, ~ (2017)
  10. Frank, Stefan L., "The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences", Brain and Language, 140, pp.1~11 (2015)
  11. Futrell, Richard, "Rnns as psycholinguistic subjects: Syntactic state and grammatical dependency", arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.01329, ~ (2018)
  12. Futrell, Richard, "Neural language models as psycholinguistic subjects: Representations of syntactic state", Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 1, pp.32~42 (2019)
  13. Gulordava, Kristina, "Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchically" (2018), Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  14. Hale, John, "A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model", Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2001)
  15. Jager, Lena A., "Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension : Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis", Journal of Memory and Language, 94, pp.316~339 (2017)
  16. Klafka, Josef, "Spying on your neighbors: Fine-grained probing of contextual embeddings for information about surrounding words", arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01810, ~ (2020)
  17. Lago, Sol, "Agreement attraction in spanish comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 82, pp.133~149 (2015)
  18. Lau, E. F., "Syntactic prediction and lexical surface frequency effects in sentence processing", University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 16, pp.163~200 (2007)
  19. Lehtonen, M., "Recognition of inflected words in a morphologically limited language : Frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), pp.121~146 (2006)
  20. Levy, Roger, "Expectation-based syntactic comprehension", Cognition, 106(3), pp.1126~1177 (2008)
  21. Lewis, Richard L., "Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension", Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(10), pp.447~454 (2006)
  22. Lewis, Richard L., "An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval", Cognitive science, 29(3), pp.375~419 (2005)
  23. Linzen, Tal, "Syntactic structure from deep learning", Annual Review of Linguistics (2021)
  24. Linzen, Tal, "Assessing the ability of lstms to learn syntaxsensitive dependencies", Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 4, pp.521~535 (2016)
  25. Logačev, P., "A multiple-channel model of task-dependent ambiguity resolution in sentence comprehension", Cognitive Science, 40(2), pp.266~298 (2016)
  26. McElree, B., "Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 48, pp.67~91 (2003)
  27. Misra, K., "Exploring BERT's Sensitivity to Lexical Cues using Tests from Semantic Priming", arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03010, ~ (2020)
  28. New, B., "The processing of singular and plural nouns in french and english", Journal of Memory and Language, 51(4), pp.568~585 (2004)
  29. Pearlmutter, Neal J, "Agreement processes in sentence comprehension", Journal of Memory and language, 41(3), pp.427~456 (1999)
  30. Radford, Alec, "Language models are unsupervised multitask learners", OpenAI blog, 1(8), pp.9~ (2019)
  31. Rye, Soo Hyun, "Accounting for Agreement Phenomena in Sentence Comprehension with Transformer Language Models: Effects of Similarity-based Interference on Surprisal and Attention", arXiv-CS-Computation and Language (IF), ~ (2021)
  32. Smith, Nathaniel J., "The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic", Cognition, 128(3), pp.302~319 (2013)
  33. Staub, Adrian, "On the interpretation of the number attraction effect : Response time evidence", Journal of memory and language, 60, pp.308~327 (2009)
  34. Staub, Adrian, "Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction", Cognition, 114, pp.447~454 (2010)
  35. Van Dyke, J., "Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing", Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(2), pp.407~430 (2007)
  36. Van Dyke, Julie A., "Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair : A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities", Journal of Memory and Language, 49(3), pp.285~316 (2003)
  37. Van Dyke, Julie A., "Cue-dependent interference in comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 65(3), pp.247~263 (2011)
  38. Van Schijndel, Marten, "Modeling garden path effects without explicit hierarchical syntax", CogSci (2018)
  39. Vasishth, S., "Processing polarity : How the ungrammatical intrudes on the grammatical", Cognitive Science, 32, pp.685~712 (2008)
  40. Vaswani, Ashish, "Attention is all you need", Advances in neural information processing systems, pp.5998~6008 (2017)
  41. Wagers, Matthew W, "Agreement attraction in comprehension : Representations and processes", Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), pp.206~237 (2009)
  42. Wilcox, Ethan, "On the predictive power of neural language models for human real-time comprehension behavior", arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.01912, ~ (2020)
  43. Xiang, M., "Illusory licensing effects across dependency types : ERP evidence", Brain Language, 108, pp.40~55 (2009)
  44. Yu, L., "Assessing Phrasal Representation and Composition in Transformers" (2020), W. H. Freeman and Company

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)