본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Prophetic Authority: A Biblical Paradigm of Spiritual Leadership

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기독교신학

초록

In the light of the present day crisis in Christian leadership (in terms of moral failure, spiritual deficiency, and lack or abuse of spiritual authority, among others), the present thesis proposes a new paradigm of “prophetic” type leadership, as exemplified by the biblical prophets and apostles, and ultimately by Jesus Christ. The thesis begins with the basic definition of leadership. Leadership is defined in terms of “influence,” and influence implies some kind of “power base.” Among several power bases (e.g., force, persuasion, manipulation, and authority), “authority” is distinguished from others in the sense of “right” or “prerogative” to exercise authority. Moreover, among a variety of authority types (e.g., coercive, induced, legitimate, competent, authority, personal, and spiritual), “spiritual authority” is most relevant to Christian leadership. Spiritual authority finds its ultimate source in God, and specifically in Jesus Christ. It is this authority of Christ delegated to us and the presence of Christ abiding with us which legitimate our authority. Thus, spiritual authority requires both leaders and followers to be accountable and submissive to the final authority of Christ. However, the tendency in many Christian circles has been to understand the issue of spiritual authority primary in terms of downward-directed authority relationships or outward- directed ministry functions. The focus seems to lie more on the relational dynamic between the leader and the people, rather than the more critical relationship between the leader and the Lord. The authority tends to be perceived more in positional or functional terms of enforcing spiritual order and protocol, rather than in terms of the leader’s accountability before the Lord. It is the proposal of this thesis that the best paradigm for understanding spiritual authority is the biblical prophetic type, which is essential a theocentric/Christocentric model which holds the leaders strictly accountable to God/Christ in exercising leadership influence. According to the biblical prophetic paradigm, the foundation for spiritual authority must be established primarily on the person of Jesus Christ (1 Cor. 3:11). Secondarily, it must be established on the Old Testament prophets and New Testament apostles (Eph. 2:20). The biblical foundation for spiritual authority, then, would properly begin with the Old Testament prophets and continue with the New Testament apostles, and culminate with the person of Jesus Christ. The analysis of the basic biblical terminology related to the prophets and apostles (nabi, roeh/hozeh, ish Elohim, ebed Yahweh, malak Yawheh, apostolos) and the select titles of Jesus (Son, Servant, Prophet, Apostle) reveal the essential prophetic characteristics, as follows: (1) intimacy with God; (2) revelatory truth; (3) supernatural power; (4) call and commission; (5) authority and submission; (6) godly character; and (7) prophetic suffering. Among these prophetic characteristics, the most significant basis for spiritual authority of the biblical prophets and apostles is their personal experience of divine call and commission. The analysis of the so-called “prophetic call/ commission narratives” (or dynamically equivalent texts) — Moses (Ex. 3:1-4:17); Samuel (1 Sam. 3:1-14); Elijah (recommission - 1 Ki. 19:1-18), Isaiah (6:1-13); Jeremiah (1:4-10); Ezekiel (1:1-3:15); the Isaian Servant (Isa. 40:1-10; 42:1-7; 49:1-6; 61:1-3); Jesus (Lk. 3:21-22; 4:18-19); the Twelve (Mt. 10:1-2; Mk. 3:13-15; Lk. 6:12-13); Paul (Gal. 1:19-20; Acts 9:3-13; 22:6-14; 26:13-17); and John (Rev. 1:9-3:22; chs. 4-5)—clearly show the authoritative claims of these prophetic servants regarding their call/commission encounter with God. They claimed that they had actually met the Lord, received a direct call/commission from the Lord, and have been divinely empowered for the service of the Lord. This criterion of divine commission/authorization (as exemplified by the select prophets and apostles, and epitomized by Jesus Christ) serves as the basis for and model of spiritual authority for the whole body of Christ, the national church, the local congregation, the spiritual leader, and even the individual Christian. In other words, we are all called to be “prophetic” servants of the Lord in the sense that we must all be responsible and accountable to the Lord who is the source of our call/commission in life and ministry.

Abstract

In the light of the present day crisis in Christian leadership (in terms of moral failure, spiritual deficiency, and lack or abuse of spiritual authority, among others), the present thesis proposes a new paradigm of “prophetic” type leadership, as exemplified by the biblical prophets and apostles, and ultimately by Jesus Christ. The thesis begins with the basic definition of leadership. Leadership is defined in terms of “influence,” and influence implies some kind of “power base.” Among several power bases (e.g., force, persuasion, manipulation, and authority), “authority” is distinguished from others in the sense of “right” or “prerogative” to exercise authority. Moreover, among a variety of authority types (e.g., coercive, induced, legitimate, competent, authority, personal, and spiritual), “spiritual authority” is most relevant to Christian leadership. Spiritual authority finds its ultimate source in God, and specifically in Jesus Christ. It is this authority of Christ delegated to us and the presence of Christ abiding with us which legitimate our authority. Thus, spiritual authority requires both leaders and followers to be accountable and submissive to the final authority of Christ. However, the tendency in many Christian circles has been to understand the issue of spiritual authority primary in terms of downward-directed authority relationships or outward- directed ministry functions. The focus seems to lie more on the relational dynamic between the leader and the people, rather than the more critical relationship between the leader and the Lord. The authority tends to be perceived more in positional or functional terms of enforcing spiritual order and protocol, rather than in terms of the leader’s accountability before the Lord. It is the proposal of this thesis that the best paradigm for understanding spiritual authority is the biblical prophetic type, which is essential a theocentric/Christocentric model which holds the leaders strictly accountable to God/Christ in exercising leadership influence. According to the biblical prophetic paradigm, the foundation for spiritual authority must be established primarily on the person of Jesus Christ (1 Cor. 3:11). Secondarily, it must be established on the Old Testament prophets and New Testament apostles (Eph. 2:20). The biblical foundation for spiritual authority, then, would properly begin with the Old Testament prophets and continue with the New Testament apostles, and culminate with the person of Jesus Christ. The analysis of the basic biblical terminology related to the prophets and apostles (nabi, roeh/hozeh, ish Elohim, ebed Yahweh, malak Yawheh, apostolos) and the select titles of Jesus (Son, Servant, Prophet, Apostle) reveal the essential prophetic characteristics, as follows: (1) intimacy with God; (2) revelatory truth; (3) supernatural power; (4) call and commission; (5) authority and submission; (6) godly character; and (7) prophetic suffering. Among these prophetic characteristics, the most significant basis for spiritual authority of the biblical prophets and apostles is their personal experience of divine call and commission. The analysis of the so-called “prophetic call/ commission narratives” (or dynamically equivalent texts) — Moses (Ex. 3:1-4:17); Samuel (1 Sam. 3:1-14); Elijah (recommission - 1 Ki. 19:1-18), Isaiah (6:1-13); Jeremiah (1:4-10); Ezekiel (1:1-3:15); the Isaian Servant (Isa. 40:1-10; 42:1-7; 49:1-6; 61:1-3); Jesus (Lk. 3:21-22; 4:18-19); the Twelve (Mt. 10:1-2; Mk. 3:13-15; Lk. 6:12-13); Paul (Gal. 1:19-20; Acts 9:3-13; 22:6-14; 26:13-17); and John (Rev. 1:9-3:22; chs. 4-5)—clearly show the authoritative claims of these prophetic servants regarding their call/commission encounter with God. They claimed that they had actually met the Lord, received a direct call/commission from the Lord, and have been divinely empowered for the service of the Lord. This criterion of divine commission/authorization (as exemplified by the select prophets and apostles, and epitomized by Jesus Christ) serves as the basis for and model of spiritual authority for the whole body of Christ, the national church, the local congregation, the spiritual leader, and even the individual Christian. In other words, we are all called to be “prophetic” servants of the Lord in the sense that we must all be responsible and accountable to the Lord who is the source of our call/commission in life and ministry.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Barna, George, "Leaders on Leadership" (1997), Regal Books
  2. Berger, Peter, "Invitation to Sociology : a Humanistic Perspective" (1963), Doubleday
  3. Brady, Chris, "Launching a Leadership Revolution: Mastering the Five Levels of Influence" (2005), Business Plus
  4. Burns, James MacGregor, "Leadership" (1978), Harper & Row, Publishers
  5. Clinton, J. Robert, "The Making of a Leader" (1988), Navpress
  6. Clinton, J. Robert, "Leadership Emergence Theory (a course manual)", Fuller Theological Seminary (1989)
  7. Enroth, Ronald M., "Churches that Abuse" (1992), Zondervan Publishing House
  8. French, John, "A power", interaction model of interpersonal influence, 1959, pp.7(2), 217~244
  9. Gnuse, Robert, "The Dream Theophany of Samuel : It’s Structure in Relation to Ancient Near Eastern Dreams and It’s Theological Significance" (1984), University Press of America
  10. Habel, Norman, "The Form and Significance of the Call Narratives", ZAW, 77, pp.297~323 (1965)
  11. Hafemaan, Scott J., "Paul, Moses, and the History of Israel" (1996), Hendrickson Publishers
  12. "Sam, “Authority,” in Baker’s Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology , ed. Walter A. Elwell" (1996)[URL]
  13. Heschel, Abraham, "The Prophets , vol. 2" (1962), Harper and Row
  14. Hiebert, Paul G., "Understanding Folk Religion", pp.323~346 (1999), Baker Books
  15. Johnson, David, "The Subtle Power of Spiritual Abuse" (1991), Bethany House Publishers
  16. Kim, Daniel J., "The Quest for Authentic Prophetic Authority: A Biblical Theology of Divine Commission", Ph. D., pp.2002
  17. Kraft, Charles, "I Give You Authority" (1997), Chosen Books
  18. Long, Burke O., "Prophetic Call Traditions and Reports of Visions", ZAW, 84, pp.494~500 (1972)
  19. Long, Burke O., "Reports of Visions Among the Prophets", JBL, 95, pp.353~365 (1976)
  20. Maxwell, John C., "Developing the Leaders Within You" (1993), Thomas Nelson Publishers
  21. Nee, Watchman, "Spiritual Authority" (1972), Christian Fellowship Publisher
  22. Norbeck, Edward, "Religion in Primitive Society", pp.101~124 (1961), Harper and Row
  23. Quebedeaux, Richard, "By What Authority: The Rise of Personality Cults in American Christianity" (1982), Harper & Row
  24. Radin, Paul, "Primitive Religion: Its Nature and Origin", pp.15~39 (1957), Dover Publications
  25. Raven, Bertrand, "Current Studies in Social Psychology", pp.371~382 (1965), Holt, Rinehart, Winston
  26. Rudge, Peter F., "Ministry and Management: The Study of Ecclesiastical Administration" (1968), Tavistock Publications
  27. Sanders, J. Oswald, "Spiritual Leadership" (1980), Moody Bible Institute
  28. ",“Definitions” in Blog post, “Liberty for Captives:Confronting Spiritual Abuse with Grace and Truth"[URL]
  29. Tidwell, N. L. A., "WAOMAR (Zech 3:5) and the Genre of Zechariah’s Fourth Vision", JBL, 94, pp.343~355 (1975)
  30. Turner, Victor W., "“Religious Specialists: Anthropological Study,” IESS, vol. 13", pp.437~444 (1968), Free Press
  31. Vallier, Ivan A., "“Religious Specialists: Sociological Study,” IESS , vol. 13", pp.444~453 (1968), Free Press
  32. Weber, Max, "The Theory of Social and Economic Organization" (1947), Oxford University Press
  33. Weber, Max, "The Sociology of Religion" (1963), Beacon Press
  34. Zimmerli, Walter, "Ezekiel 1: A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Ezekiel: chapters 1-24. Hermeneia" (1979), Fortress Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)