본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

데이먼 갤것의『착한 의사 』—자기와 타자의 만남과 작품해석의 변증법

Damon Galgut’s The Good Doctor: Dialectics of I and the Other and of Interpretations

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study aims to analyze South African novelist, Damon Galgut’s The Good Doctor from the perspective of the dialectics of I and the Other and of interpretations. In the novel the protagonist and narrator, Frank Eloff wishes to maintain the status quo and isolation, but Laurence Waters’s appearance at the hospital disturbs Frank’s desire. The encountering with Laurence initiates a dialectical movement and a struggle for recognition begins. Through this process Frank’s and Laurence’s worlds of simulation, built on words and symbols, are shaken and each sublimates to a different subject. The dialectical movement is not confined to the different subjects but extends to the interpretations of the novel itself. In the early phase of the study of the novel, it was considered a realist work representing contemporary South African socio-political condition and Frank’s cynicism was widely and deeply criticised. However, other scholars have since focused on its poststructural characteristics and emphasized Frank’s willingness to accept his pliable identity and future.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze South African novelist, Damon Galgut’s The Good Doctor from the perspective of the dialectics of I and the Other and of interpretations. In the novel the protagonist and narrator, Frank Eloff wishes to maintain the status quo and isolation, but Laurence Waters’s appearance at the hospital disturbs Frank’s desire. The encountering with Laurence initiates a dialectical movement and a struggle for recognition begins. Through this process Frank’s and Laurence’s worlds of simulation, built on words and symbols, are shaken and each sublimates to a different subject. The dialectical movement is not confined to the different subjects but extends to the interpretations of the novel itself. In the early phase of the study of the novel, it was considered a realist work representing contemporary South African socio-political condition and Frank’s cynicism was widely and deeply criticised. However, other scholars have since focused on its poststructural characteristics and emphasized Frank’s willingness to accept his pliable identity and future.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. 백훈승, "헤겔과 변증법: 그것의 기원과 발전과 쟁점을 중심으로" (2022), 서광사
  2. Barris, Ken, "Realism, Absence and the Man Booker Shortlist: Damon Galgut’s The Good Doctor", Current Writing, 17(2), pp.24~41 (2005)
  3. Cabarcos-Traseira, Maria Jesus, "Dire Situations and Bad Prospects: Damon Galgut’s Glance at South Africa’s Past and Present in The Good Doctor", Current Writing, 17(2), pp.42~55 (2002)
  4. Galgut, Damon, "The Good Doctor" (2003), Atlantic Books
  5. Galgut, Damon, "The Promise" (2021), Penguin
  6. Kostelac, Sofia, "Towards a Narrative Identity in Damon Galgut’s The Good Doctor", English in Africa, 44(1), pp.35~53 (2017)
  7. Marais, Mike, "Necrophiliac Narration and the Business of Friends: Damon Galgut’s The Good Doctor", Safundi, pp.1~16 (2014)
  8. Titlestad, Michael, "Allegories of White Masculinity in Damon Galgut’s The Good Doctor", Social Dynamics, 35(1), pp.111~122 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)