단결정형 세라믹 브라켓의 재접착 시 tribochemical silica coating이 전단접착강도에 미치는 영향
Effect of tribochemical silica coating on the shear bond strength of rebonded monocrystalline ceramic brackets
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 탈락된 세라믹 브라켓을 tribochemical silica coating하고 nano-filled flowable composite resin (Transbond Supreme LV, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif, USA)을 이용하여 재접착하였을 때 교정치료에 충분한 접착강도를 얻을 수 있는지 평가하기 위해 시행하였다. 총 60개의 소구치를 준비하여 다음의 4개 군으로 나누었다: Tribochemical silica coating (TC) + Transbond Supreme LV (LV), TC + Transbond XT (XT), Sandblast treatment (SA) + LV, SA + XT. 재처리된 세라믹 브라켓은 각각의 접착제를 이용하여 치아에 부착하였다. 시편들을 상온의 생리식염수에 1주일간 보관한 뒤 열순환을 시켰다. 만능시험기로 전단접착강도를 측정한 뒤 파절양상을 평가하였다. TC군은 임상적으로 충분한 강도를 보였다(TCLV: 10.82 ± 1.82 MPa, TCXT: 11.50 ± 1.72 MPa). 하지만 SA군은 TC군에 비하여 유의하게 낮은 전단접착강도를 보였다(SALV: 1.23 ± 1.16 MPa, SAXT: 1.76 ± 1.39 MPa, p ＜ 0.05). LV군과 XT군의 전단접착강도는 유의한 차이가 없었다. TCLV, TCXT군 모두 시편의 77%가 접착제에서의 파절을 보였고, 각 군당 1개씩의 시편에서 법랑질 파절이 관찰되었다. SA군은 모든 파절이 브라켓과 접착제 계면에서 발생하였다. LV군과 XT군의 탈락양상에는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 이상의 연구 결과에서 보면 nano-filled flowable composite resin과 tribochemical silica coating 처리를 이용하여 세라믹 브라켓을 재접착하면 충분한 전단접착강도를 얻을 수 있다. 단 법랑질 파절의 가능성이 있으므로 탈접착 시 적절한 기구와 기술을 이용해 주의깊게 브라켓을 제거해야 한다. (대치교정지 2010;40(3):184-194)
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of tribochemical silica coating on the shear bond strength (SBS) of rebonded ceramic brackets using nano-filled flowable composite resin. Methods: A total of 60 premolars were prepared and divided into 4 equal groups as follows: Tribochemical silica coating (TC) + Transbond XT (XT), TC + Transbond supreme LV (LV), Sandblast treatment (SA) + XT, SA + LV. Treated ceramic brackets were rebonded on the premolars using each adhesive. All samples were tested in shear mode on a universal testing machine. Results: SBS of silica coated groups were high enough for clinical usage (TCLV: 10.82 ± 1.82 MPa, TCXT: 11.50 ± 1.72 MPa). But, SBS of the sandblast treated groups had significantly lower values than the tribochemical silica coated groups (SALV, 1.23 ± 1.16 MPa; SAXT, 1.76 ± 1.39 MPa; p ＜ 0.05). There was no difference between the shear bond strength by type of adhesive. In the silica coated groups, 77% of the samples showed bonding failure in the adhesive. In the sandblast treated group, all bonding failures occurred at the bracket-adhesive interface. Conclusions: The result of this study suggest that newly introduced nano-filled flowable composite resin and tribochemical silica coating application on debonded ceramic bracket bases can produce appropriate bond strengths for orthodontic bonding. (Korean J Orthod 2010;40(3):184-194)
참고문헌 (39)
- Kew KK, "Recycling ceramic brackets", J Clin Orthod, 24, pp.44~7 (1990)
- Andrews LF, "The six keys to normal occlusion", Am J Orthod, 62, pp.296~309 (1972)
- McLaughlin RP, "Finishing and detailing with a preadjusted appliance system", J Clin Orthod, 25, pp.251~64 (1991)
- Reynolds IR, "A review of direct orthodontic bonding", Br J Orthod, 2, pp.171~8 (1975)
- 성지영, "세라믹 브라켓의 재접착이 전단 결합 강도에 미치는 영향", 대한치과교정학회지, 39(4), pp.234~247 (2009), 대한치과교정학회
- Martina R, "Recycling effects on ceramic brackets: a dimensional, weight and shear bond strength analysis", Eur J Orthod, 19, pp.629~36 (1997)
- Gaffey PG, "Shear", peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets, 1995, pp.65, 351~7
- Yim JB, "Shear bond strength of recycled orthodontic brackets treated by variable reconditioning methods", Korean J Orthod, 26, pp.569~79 (1996)
- Chung CH, "Shear bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122, pp.282~7 (2002)
- Toroglu MS, "Effects of sandblasting and silica coating on the bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.181~7 (2008)
- 강상욱, "수 종의 도재 수복물에 부착된 세라믹 브라켓의 전단접착강도와 파절양상에 열순환이 미치는 영향", 대한치과교정학회지, 39(4), pp.225~233 (2009), 대한치과교정학회
- Zachrisson BU, "Bonding in orthodontics. In Orthodontics: current principles & techniques. 4th ed", pp.579~659 (2005), Mosby
- Shahverdi S, "Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain", J Oral Rehabil, 25, pp.699~705 (1998)
- Zachrisson YO, "Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 109, pp.420~30 (1996)
- Birnie D, "Ceramic brackets", Br J Orthod, 17, pp.71~4 (1990)
- Harris AM, "Shear peel bond strengths of esthetic orthodontic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 102, pp.215~9 (1992)
- Calamia JR, "Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of the art", Quintessence Int, 16, pp.5~12 (1985)
- Kern M, "Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.240~9 (1995)
- Amaral R, "Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning", Dent Mater, 22, pp.283~90 (2006)
- Matinlinna JP, "Silane based concepts on bonding resin composite to metals", J Contemp Dent Pract, 8, pp.1~8 (2007)
- Bayne SC, "A characterization of first-generation flowable composites", J Am Dent Assoc, 129, pp.567~77 (1998)
- D'Attilio M, "Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of a new flowable composite for orthodontic use", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.410~5 (2005)
- Miles PG, "Indirect bonding with a flowable light-cured adhesive", J Clin Orthod, 36, pp.646~7 (2002)
- Uysal T, "Are the flowable compoites suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding?", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.697~702 (2004)
- Ryou DB, "Use of flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.1105~9 (2008)
- Tecco S, "A new one-step dental flowable composite for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond strength", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.672~7 (2005)
- Bishara SE, "Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets", World J Orthod, 8, pp.8~12 (2007)
- Bishara SE, "Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 116, pp.616~20 (1999)
- Blatz MB, "Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.268~74 (2003)
- Kitahara-Céia FM, "Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.548~55 (2008)
- Habibi M, "Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.675~9 (2007)
- Bishara SE, "A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 104, pp.170~9 (1993)
- Andreasen GF, "Bonding and debonding brackets to porcelain and gold", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 93, pp.341~5 (1988)
- Katona TR, "The effects of load misalignment on tensile load testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets--a finite element model", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 105, pp.543~54 (1994)
- Oilo G, "Bond strength testing--what does it mean?", Int Dent J, 43, pp.492~8 (1993)
- Bishara SE, "The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive", Angle Orthod, 70, pp.435~41 (2000)
- Bishara SE, "The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121, pp.521~5 (2002)
- Ostertag AJ, "Shear, torsional, and tensile bond strengths of ceramic brackets using three adhesive filler concentrations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100, pp.251~8 (1991)
- Smith RM, "Effect of environmental stress and surface treatment on resin-to-metal bonding", Am J Dent, 6, pp.111~5 (1993)