본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북한 민족관현악, 그 소통과 혁신

Modern Traditional Orchestra in North Korean: Communication and Renovation

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류음악학

초록

The performance of Pyeongyang Ethnic Music Troupe, on December 10, 1990, in Seoul National Theatre was a great success, not only among Korean music specialists but among general public. They have also performed a day before at the Seoul Arts Center. In October, the same year, Seoul Traditional Music Troupe received a warm welcome at Pyeongyang. Also in December, for 1990 Year's-end concert for Unification Traditional Concert, both Seoul Traditional Music Troupe and Pyeongyang Ethnic Music Troupe have together performed their music. People were especially interested since it was the first concert in 45 years since the separation, where the South and the North have performed together. This concert revealed the reality of each party and even though that reality showed two different political systems, it also confirmed that they belonged to one identity; one ethnic entity, raising more people's expectations for cultural unification. Especially noteworthy among the repertoire for Pyeongyang musicians was the solos for the danso, oknyugeum, and gayageum, as well as the orchestrated energy of the ensemble. This was because the instruments used by the North have all been modified, which gave great inspiration to the musicians and instrument renovators in the South. This indicates that the North has succeeded in its communication and musical innovation with its audience in terms of instruments, composition, and performance venue. If music is an expressive medium, as well as a creative and communicative art, the general public should be able to participate in the process of its expression, creation, and communication. The North Korea's sense of purpose in finding such meaning in their arts is reflected in the renovative nature of their instrument development and orchestration. Therefore, this paper will investigate the state of innovation and communication found in the North Korean Ethnic orchestra, with a study of its past history.

Abstract

The performance of Pyeongyang Ethnic Music Troupe, on December 10, 1990, in Seoul National Theatre was a great success, not only among Korean music specialists but among general public. They have also performed a day before at the Seoul Arts Center. In October, the same year, Seoul Traditional Music Troupe received a warm welcome at Pyeongyang. Also in December, for 1990 Year's-end concert for Unification Traditional Concert, both Seoul Traditional Music Troupe and Pyeongyang Ethnic Music Troupe have together performed their music. People were especially interested since it was the first concert in 45 years since the separation, where the South and the North have performed together. This concert revealed the reality of each party and even though that reality showed two different political systems, it also confirmed that they belonged to one identity; one ethnic entity, raising more people's expectations for cultural unification. Especially noteworthy among the repertoire for Pyeongyang musicians was the solos for the danso, oknyugeum, and gayageum, as well as the orchestrated energy of the ensemble. This was because the instruments used by the North have all been modified, which gave great inspiration to the musicians and instrument renovators in the South. This indicates that the North has succeeded in its communication and musical innovation with its audience in terms of instruments, composition, and performance venue. If music is an expressive medium, as well as a creative and communicative art, the general public should be able to participate in the process of its expression, creation, and communication. The North Korea's sense of purpose in finding such meaning in their arts is reflected in the renovative nature of their instrument development and orchestration. Therefore, this paper will investigate the state of innovation and communication found in the North Korean Ethnic orchestra, with a study of its past history.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 노동은, "북한의 민족음악 in 민족음악론", pp.353~454 (1991), 한길사
  2. 노동은, "남북통일음악발전계획 in 한국음악론", pp.535~573 (2002), 한국학술정보주식회사
  3. 노동은, "백제권음악과 21세기 in 한국음악론", pp.297~332 (2002), 한국학술정보주식회사
  4. 노동은, "북한중앙음악단체의 현황과 전망 in 한국음악론", pp.479~534 (2002), 한국학술정보주식회사
  5. 리허림, "새시대음악의 과업과 민족적 특성에 대한 몇가지 문제 in 현대성과 우리음악", pp.5~44 (1963), 조선문학예술총동맹출판사
  6. 박정남, "배합관현악편성법" (1990), 문예출판사
  7. 이왕기, "현대성과 우리음악" (1963), 조선문학예술총동맹출판사
  8. 이왕기, "북한건축, 또 하나의 우리 모습" (2000), (주)서울포럼
  9. "조선민족악기" (1994), 문학예술종합출판사
  10. "민족음악의 계승발전" (1991), 문예출판사
  11. "위대한 수령 김일성동지 문학예술령도사" (1991), 문예출판사
  12. "조선예술 제2호 in 조선적인 것을 바탕으로 하여야 한다", pp.48~51, 조선예술사
  13. Brymer, Jack, "Clarinet" (1976), Schirmer Books
  14. Bernays, Edward L, "Propaganda" (1928), Horace Liveright
  15. Mark, Michael, "Contemporary Music Education" (1978), Scirmer Books
  16. Shannon, Claude E, "The Mathematical Theory of Communication" (1979), University of Illinois Press
  17. Thrasher, Alan R, "'Boehm, Theobald', The Grove Dictionary of Musical Instruments" (1984), Macmillan Press Limited
  18. "민족문제 in 백과전서 2", pp.892~893 (1983), 과학,백과사전출판사
  19. "민족문화유산 in백과전서 2", pp.893~ (1983), 과학,백과사전출판사
  20. "민족악기 in 백과전서2", pp.899~900 (1983), 과학,백과사전출판사
  21. "민족음악 in 백과전서2", pp.900~901 (1983), 과학,백과사전출판사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)