사이크스-피코 비밀협정과 레바논, 시리아 건국 과정
The Sykes-Picot Secret Agreement and the Process of Nation-building in Lebanon and Syria
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of this article is to analyze the Sykes-Picot Secret Agreement and its relation to nation-building in Lebanon and Syria. During the period of the First World War, three contradictory promises, including the Hussein-McMahon Correspondence, the Sykes-Picot Secret Agreement, and the Balfour Declaration were made by Britain with Arabs, Jews, and the French. Among these three, the Sykes-Picot Secret Agreement became the cornerstone of the subsequent division of the Levantine region into a series of separate nations after the war. This agreement was designed by Mark Sykes and François Georges-Picot, without considering the aspirations of the native people. According to their Imperial interests, Britain and France started to build artificial nations in their mandatory regions, but the new nations lacked basic conditions required for development into viable nations. As a result, political instability in these nations continues to exist until today. This paper also found that the difference between British and French colonial attitudes toward the Arab World affected the successes and failures of nation-building. The British was more cooperative with the local people, while the French employed more repressive measures to rule the natives. Due to these differences, nations built by the British have been more stable and peaceful, whereas nations built by the French, such as Lebanon and Syria, have experienced a greater deal of political instability and faced many difficulties after independence.
Abstract
The main purpose of this article is to analyze the Sykes-Picot Secret Agreement and its relation to nation-building in Lebanon and Syria. During the period of the First World War, three contradictory promises, including the Hussein-McMahon Correspondence, the Sykes-Picot Secret Agreement, and the Balfour Declaration were made by Britain with Arabs, Jews, and the French. Among these three, the Sykes-Picot Secret Agreement became the cornerstone of the subsequent division of the Levantine region into a series of separate nations after the war. This agreement was designed by Mark Sykes and François Georges-Picot, without considering the aspirations of the native people. According to their Imperial interests, Britain and France started to build artificial nations in their mandatory regions, but the new nations lacked basic conditions required for development into viable nations. As a result, political instability in these nations continues to exist until today. This paper also found that the difference between British and French colonial attitudes toward the Arab World affected the successes and failures of nation-building. The British was more cooperative with the local people, while the French employed more repressive measures to rule the natives. Due to these differences, nations built by the British have been more stable and peaceful, whereas nations built by the French, such as Lebanon and Syria, have experienced a greater deal of political instability and faced many difficulties after independence.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김진웅, "비교정치론 강의 1" (1992), 한울아카데미
- 박찬기, "중동정치의 이해 1", pp.253~332 (2004), 한울아카데미
- 박찬기, "헤즈볼라, 하마스, 무슬림형제단 및마흐디 민병대" (2009), 명진 C&I
- Anderson, Roy R., "Politics and Change in the Middle East" (2012), Longman
- Anderson, Scott, "Lawrence in Arabia: War, Deceit, Imperial Folly and the Making of the Modern Middle East" (2013), Doubleday
- Barr, James, "A Line in the Sand: The Anglo-French Struggle for the Middle East, 1914-1948" (2012), W.W. Norton & Company
- Florence, Ronald, "Lawrence and Aaronsohn" (2007), Penguin Books
- Hinnebusch, Raymond, "The Government and Politics of the Middle East and North Africa", pp.255~280 (2014), West View Press
- Kamraya, Mehran, "The Modern Middle East: A Political History since the First World War" (2011), University of California Press
- MacMillan, Margaret, "Paris 1919L Six Months That Changed the World" (2003), Random House
- MacQueen, Benjamin, "An Introduction to Middle East Politics" (2013), Sage
- Mansel, Philip, "Levant: Splendour and Catastrophe on the Mediterranean" (2010), Yale University Press
- Ma'oz, Moshe, "Syria under Assad: Domestic Constraints and Regional Risks", pp.9~35 (2014), Routledge
- Migdal, Joel S, "Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World" (1988), Princeton University Press
- Milton-Edwards, Beverley, "Contemporary Politics in the Middle East" (2011), Polity
- Mufti, Malik, "Sovereign Creations: Pan-Arabism and Political Order in Syria and Iraq" (1996), Cornell University Press
- Pipes, Daniel, "Greater Syria: The History of an Ambition" (1990), Oxford University Press
- Provence, Michael, "The Great Syrian Revolt and the Rise of Arab Nationalism" (2005), University of Texas Press
- Rabinovich, Itamar, "The View from Damascus: State. Political Community and Foreign Relations in Twentieth-Century Syria" (2008), Vallentine Mitchell
- Seale, Patrick, "Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East" (1995), University of California Press
- Sorenson, David S, "An Introduction to the Modern Middle East: History, Religion, Political Economy, Politics, Boulder" (2014), West View Press
- Teitelbaum, Joshua, "The Rise and Fall of the Hashimite Kingdom of Arabia" (2001), University Press
- Traboulsi, Fawwaz, "A History of Modern Lebanon" (2007), Pluto Press
- Woodward, Peter, "Sudan, 1898-1989: The Unstable State" (1990), Lynne Rienner Publishers
- "대구상의 좌절" (2011)[URL]
- "The Apple of Discord: The Impact of the Levant on Anglo-French Relations during 1943" (1990)[URL]
- "British and French Colonial Attitudes Towards the Arab World" (2011)[URL]
- "Why was France so determined to gain control of Syria post-World War I?" (2014)[URL]