본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of MucostaⓇ (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. Methods: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 475 patients with endoscopically proven erosive gastritis to two groups: AD-203 twice daily or MucostaⓇ thrice daily for 2 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included 454 patients (AD-203, n=229; MucostaⓇ, n=225), and the per-protocol (PP) analysis included 439 patients (AD-203, n=224; MucostaⓇ, n=215). The posttreatment assessments included the primary (erosion improvement rate) and secondary endpoints (erosion and edema cure rates; improvement rates of redness, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Drug-related adverse events were evaluated. Results: According to the ITT analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and MucostaⓇ-treated patients were 39.7% and 43.8%, respectively. According to the PP analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and MucostaⓇ-treated patients were 39.3% and 43.7%, respectively. The one-sided 97.5% lower limit for the improvement rate difference between the study groups was −4.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], –13.09% to 5.06%) in the ITT analysis and −4.44% (95% CI, –13.65% to 4.78%) in the PP analysis. The groups did not significantly differ in the secondary endpoints in either analysis. Twenty-four AD-203-treated and 20 MucostaⓇ-treated patients reported adverse events but no serious adverse drug reactions; both groups presented similar adverse event rates. Conclusions: The new formulation of rebamipide 150 mg (AD-203) twice daily was not inferior to rebamipide 100 mg (MucostaⓇ) thrice daily. Both formulations showed a similar efficacy in treating erosive gastritis.

Abstract

Background/Aims: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of MucostaⓇ (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. Methods: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 475 patients with endoscopically proven erosive gastritis to two groups: AD-203 twice daily or MucostaⓇ thrice daily for 2 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included 454 patients (AD-203, n=229; MucostaⓇ, n=225), and the per-protocol (PP) analysis included 439 patients (AD-203, n=224; MucostaⓇ, n=215). The posttreatment assessments included the primary (erosion improvement rate) and secondary endpoints (erosion and edema cure rates; improvement rates of redness, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Drug-related adverse events were evaluated. Results: According to the ITT analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and MucostaⓇ-treated patients were 39.7% and 43.8%, respectively. According to the PP analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and MucostaⓇ-treated patients were 39.3% and 43.7%, respectively. The one-sided 97.5% lower limit for the improvement rate difference between the study groups was −4.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], –13.09% to 5.06%) in the ITT analysis and −4.44% (95% CI, –13.65% to 4.78%) in the PP analysis. The groups did not significantly differ in the secondary endpoints in either analysis. Twenty-four AD-203-treated and 20 MucostaⓇ-treated patients reported adverse events but no serious adverse drug reactions; both groups presented similar adverse event rates. Conclusions: The new formulation of rebamipide 150 mg (AD-203) twice daily was not inferior to rebamipide 100 mg (MucostaⓇ) thrice daily. Both formulations showed a similar efficacy in treating erosive gastritis.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Laine L, "Interobserver agreement and predictive value of endoscopic findings for H. pylori and gastritis in normal volunteers", Gastrointest Endosc, 42, pp.420~423 (1995)
  2. Park HK, "The distribution of endoscopic gastritis in 25, 536 heath check-up subjects in Korea", Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res, 12, pp.237~243 (2012)
  3. Yoshikazu Kinoshita, "Advantages and Disadvantages of Long-term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use", Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (JNM), 24(2), pp.182~196 (2018), 대한소화기 기능성질환∙운동학회[DOI]
  4. Jalving M, "Increased risk of fundic gland polyps during long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 24, pp.1341~1348 (2006)
  5. Raghunath AS, "Review article : the long-term use of proton-pump inhibitors", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 22(Suppl 1), pp.55~63 (2005)
  6. 김광하, "Proton Pump Inhibitor-Related Gastric Mucosal Changes", Gut and Liver, 15(5), pp.646~652 (2021), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회[DOI]
  7. García Rodríguez LA, "Gastric acid suppression and risk of oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma : a nested case control study in the UK", Gut, 55, pp.1538~1544 (2006)
  8. Waldum HL, "Proton pump inhibitors(PPIs)may cause gastric cancer : clinical consequences", Scand J Gastroenterol, 53, pp.639~642 (2018)
  9. Du Y, "Anti-inflammatory effects of rebamipide according to Helicobacter pylori status in patients with chronic erosive gastritis : a randomized sucralfatecontrolled multicenter trial in China-STARS study", Dig Dis Sci, 53, pp.2886~2895 (2008)
  10. Chitapanarux T, "An open-labeled study of rebamipide treatment in chronic gastritis patients with dyspeptic symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitors", Dig Dis Sci, 53, pp.2896~2903 (2008)
  11. Han X, "Effect of rebamipide on the premalignant progression of chronic gastritis : a randomized controlled study", Clin Drug Investig, 35, pp.665~673 (2015)
  12. Arakawa T, "15th anniversary of rebamipide : looking ahead to the new mechanisms and new applications", Dig Dis Sci, 50(Suppl 1), pp.S3~S11 (2005)
  13. Naito Y, "Rebamipide : a gastrointestinal protective drug with pleiotropic activities", Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 4, pp.261~270 (2010)
  14. Hasegawa S, "Bioequivalence of rebamipide granules and tablets in healthy adult male volunteers", Clin Drug Investig, 23, pp.771~779 (2003)
  15. Seol SY, "DA9601 for erosive gastritis : results of a double-blind placebocontrolled phase III clinical trial", World J Gastroenterol, 10, pp.2379~2382 (2004)
  16. 심기남, "The efficacy and safety of irsogladine maleate in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or aspirin-induced peptic ulcer and gastritis", The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 34(5), pp.1008~1021 (2019), 대한내과학회[DOI]
  17. 정정조, "위염 환자에서 글립타이드?정(Sulglycotide 200 mg)의 치료 효과를 평가하기 위한 단일맹검, 무작위 배정, 비교약 대조, 다기관 임상시험", Clinical Endoscopy, 35(3), pp.125~132 (2007), 대한소화기내시경학회
  18. 최윤진, "Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DA-9601 versus Its New Formulation, DA-5204, in Patients with Gastritis: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(11), pp.1807~1818 (2017), 대한의학회
  19. 한혜원, "미란성 위염에 대한 알비스^Ⓡ의 효과: 스티렌^Ⓡ 대조 무작위 이중맹검 다기관 임상시험", Clinical Endoscopy, 42(4), pp.215~221 (2011), 대한소화기내시경학회
  20. Syam AF, "Molecular mechanism on healing process of peptic ulcer", Acta Med Indones, 41, pp.95~98 (2009)
  21. Risau W, "Mechanisms of angiogenesis", Nature, 386, pp.671~674 (1997)
  22. Tarnawski A, "Rebamipide treatment activates epidermal growth factor and its receptor expression in normal and ulcerated gastric mucosa in rats:one mechanism for its ulcer healing action?", Dig Dis Sci, 43(9 Suppl), pp.90S~98S (1998)
  23. Haruma K, "Long-term rebamipide therapy improves Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic gastritis", Dig Dis Sci, 47, pp.862~867 (2002)
  24. Kamada T, "Rebamipide improves chronic inflammation in the lesser curvature of the corpus after Helicobacter pylori eradication : a multicenter study", Biomed Res Int, 2015, pp.865146~ (2015)
  25. Kim HK, "Preventive effects of rebamipide on NSAID-induced gastric mucosal injury and reduction of gastric mucosal blood flow in healthy volunteers", Dig Dis Sci, 52, pp.1776~1782 (2007)
  26. Miwa H, "Effect of a gastroprotective agent, rebamipide, on symptom improvement in patients with functional dyspepsia : a double-blind placebo-controlled study in Japan", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 21, pp.1826~1831 (2006)
  27. Claxton AJ, "A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance", Clin Ther, 23, pp.1296~1310 (2001)
  28. Garfinkel D, "Feasibility study of a systematic approach for discontinuation of multiple medications in older adults : addressing polypharmacy", Arch Intern Med, 170, pp.1648~1654 (2010)
  29. Toh MR, "Association between number of doses per day, number of medications and patient's non-compliance, and frequency of readmissions in a multi-ethnic Asian population", Prev Med Rep, 1, pp.43~47 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DW1903 in Patients with Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 study김나영, 김재규, 조광범, Cheon Gab Jin, Cho Jin Woong, Chun Hoon Jai, Hong Su Jin, Jang Jae-Young, Jang Jin Seok, Jeon Seong Woo, Jung Hwoon-Yong, Kang Dae Hwan, Kim Gwang Ha, Kim Hyun-Soo, Kim Jae J., Kim Jie-Hyun, Kim Kyoung Oh, Kim Sang Gyun, Kim Tae Oh, Lee Sang Woo, Lee Soo Teik, Lee Sora, Lee Yong Chan, Park Jong-Jae, Park Moo In, Park Seon-Young, Sung Jae Kyu, Yoo In Kyung거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2024 · 제18권 제1호Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a Dual Delayed-Release Formulation of 10-mg Esomeprazole in Patients with Gastric Erosions: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Control, Phase III StudyGwang Ha Kim, Hee Seok Moon, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Hyun Lim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Jae-Young Jang, Jeong Seop Moon, Ji Won Kim, Jong-Jae Park, Jong Kyu Park, Joong Goo Kwon, Ju Yup Lee, Ki Bae Kim, Kim Nayoung, Kwang Jae Lee, Kye Sook Kwon, Sang Gyun Kim, Sang Wook Kim, Suck Chei Choi, Su Jin Hong, Sung Hee Hong, Yirang Lim, Yong Hwan Kwon, Young Hoon Youn거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2025 · 제19권 제4호Limited Effect of Rebamipide in Addition to Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) in the Treatment of Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Gastric Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing PPI Plus Rebamipide Combination Therapy with PPI MonotherapyAkira Aso, Eikichi Ihara, Haruei Ogino, Hirotada Akiho, Kazuhiko Nakamura, Kazuya Akahoshi, Naohiko Harada, Norimoto Nakamura, Ryoichi Takayanagi, Toshiaki Ochiai, Tsutomu Iwasa, Yoichiro Iboshi거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2016 · 제10권 제6호Preventive Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide in Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Induced Mucosal Toxicity박원, 강영모, 김성국, 김정호, 류완희, 박수헌, 박용욱, 유종선, 이돈행, 이수곤, 이수택, 이용찬, 조철수거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2014 · 제8권 제4호The effect of rebamipide on non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug-induced gastro-enteropathy: a multi-center, randomized pilot study김나영, Cheol Min Shin, Dong Ho Lee, Dong Jun Oh, Eun Ha Kang, Fei Liu, Hyuk Yoon, Hyun Soo Kim, Ki-Jeoung Kim, Nayoung Kim, Yoon Jin Choi, You-Jung Ha, Young Soo Park, Yun Jong Lee대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2022 · 제37권 제6호Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan in Patients with Acute or Chronic Gastritis김나영, 김재규, 손정일, 심기남, 이광재, 이국래, 장재영, 전훈재, Baek Song, Choi Myung-Gyu, Choi Suk Chei, Han Jin Joo, Hong Su Jin, Huh Kyu Chan, Jang Jin Seok, Jung Hwoon-Yong, Kim Gwang Ha, Kim Jin Il, Kim Ki Bae, Kim Sang Gyun, Kim Sung Kook, Lee Oh Young, Lee Soo Teik, Lee Yong Chan, Park Hyojin거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2023 · 제17권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)