본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Comparative Study on Preference Factors of Urban Parks by Cultural Area Based on Big Data Analysis

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Determining the usage and preferred activities of urban residents in urban parks is crucial for effective park planning, design, management, and operation. This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of urban park users' preferences and satisfaction factors during the pandemic in eight cultural spheres worldwide. We analysed 75,283 reviews on Google Maps for 49 urban parks in 49 countries across five continents to identify general preference factors in terms of economic power, urban park area, and cultural sphere. Furthermore, we investigated variations in preference factors by a cultural sphere and their reflection in each cultural sphere's urban park. We pre-processed the data and used topic modelling with Latent Dirichlet Allocation to classify satisfaction factors into natural/ecological, cultural/ facility, physical/active, and socialising aspects. The results showed an even distribution of preference factors worldwide, with differences in significant preference ratios of satisfaction factors, urban park usage patterns, and satisfaction factors by race and country across cultural spheres. This study contributes to urban park planning and design by demonstrating the possibility of analysing global spaces beyond spatial limitations using non-face-to-face surveys based on big data when face-to-face surveys are challenging.

Abstract

Determining the usage and preferred activities of urban residents in urban parks is crucial for effective park planning, design, management, and operation. This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of urban park users' preferences and satisfaction factors during the pandemic in eight cultural spheres worldwide. We analysed 75,283 reviews on Google Maps for 49 urban parks in 49 countries across five continents to identify general preference factors in terms of economic power, urban park area, and cultural sphere. Furthermore, we investigated variations in preference factors by a cultural sphere and their reflection in each cultural sphere's urban park. We pre-processed the data and used topic modelling with Latent Dirichlet Allocation to classify satisfaction factors into natural/ecological, cultural/ facility, physical/active, and socialising aspects. The results showed an even distribution of preference factors worldwide, with differences in significant preference ratios of satisfaction factors, urban park usage patterns, and satisfaction factors by race and country across cultural spheres. This study contributes to urban park planning and design by demonstrating the possibility of analysing global spaces beyond spatial limitations using non-face-to-face surveys based on big data when face-to-face surveys are challenging.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Blei, "Latent drichlet allocation", Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, pp.993~1022 (2003)
  2. DiMaggio, P., "Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding", Poetics, 41(6), pp.570~606 (2013)
  3. Improving urban parks, play areas and green spaces, "Dunnett, N.", Department for transport, local government and the regions, ~ (2002)
  4. Geng, D., "Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: a global analysis", Journal of Forestry Research, 32, pp.553~567 (2021)
  5. Gobster, P. H., "The human dimensions of urban greenways:planning for recreation and related experiences", Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(2-3), pp.147~165 (2004)
  6. Greenhalgh L., "Park life: Urban parks and social renewal" (1995), Comedia and Demos
  7. Perceptions of open space: A report on research undertaken by Urban Wildlife Group, "Gregory J.", Urban Wildlife Trust, ~ (1988)
  8. Ho, C. H., "Gender and ethnic variations in urban park preferences, visitation, and perceived benefits", Journal of Leisure Research, 37(3), pp.281~306 (2005)
  9. Hutchison, R., "Ethnicity and urban recreation: Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics in Chicago's public parks", Journal of Leisure Research, 19(3), pp.205~222 (1987)
  10. Jarvis P, "People, parks and priorities: Three Birmingham examples", Urban Nat Mag, pp.145~150 (1997)
  11. Jim, C. Y., "Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China", Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(1–2), pp.81~96 (2006)
  12. Joe, A., "Mobility pattern analysis of bus passengers with LDA", Master, pp.2015
  13. Kim, J. E., "Analysis of Behavioral Characteristics by Park Types Displayed in 3 rd Generation SNS", Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 47(2), pp.49~58 (2019)
  14. Klinenberg, E., "Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life" (2018), Crown Publishing Group
  15. Open space planning in London: A report, "London Planning Advisory Committee", Llewelyn-Davies Planning & Environmental Trust Associates Ltd, ~ (1992)
  16. Loukaitou-Sideris, A., "Urban form and social context : Cultural differentiation in the uses of urban parks", Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(2), pp.89~102 (1995)
  17. People and nature in cities. The social aspects of planning and managing natural parks in urban areas: A report for the trust for urban ecology, "Milward", Nature Publishing Conservancy Council, ~ (1998)
  18. Nahm, C. H., "An illustrative application of topic modeling method to a farmer’s diary", Cross-Cultural Studies, 22(1), pp.89~135 (2016)
  19. Oh, J,., "Game review analysis by using Word2Vec and LDA", Journal of Korean Management Science Conference, pp.2344~2349 (2018)
  20. Ordóñez-Barona, C., "How different ethno-cultural groups value urban forests and its implications for managing urban nature in a multicultural landscape: A systematic review of the literature", Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 26, pp.65~77 (2017)
  21. Özgüner, H., "Cultural differences in attitudes towards urban parks and green spaces", Landscape Research, 36(5), pp.599~620 (2011)
  22. Park, K., "Park and neighborhood attributes associated with park use: An observational study using unmanned aerial vehicles", Environment and Behavior, 52(5), pp.518~543 (2020)
  23. Park M., "A study on the topic analysis of the 4th Industrial Revolution news articles using LDA and Word2vec", Master, pp.2019
  24. Park, S., "Evolving Norms : Social Media Data Analysis on Parks and Greenspaces Perception Changes Before and After COVID-19Pandemic", Scientific Reports, 12, pp.13246~ (2022)
  25. Roberts, H., "Associations between park features, park satisfaction and park use in a multi-ethnic deprived urban area", Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 46, pp.126485~ (2019)
  26. Royal Parks Agency, "People using the Royal Parks", Parks, ~ (1994)
  27. Song, X. P., "Using social media user attributes to understand human–environment interactions at urban parks", Scientific Reports, 10(1), pp.808~ (2020)
  28. Sreetheran, M., "Exploring the urban park use, preference and behaviours among the residents of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia", Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 25, pp.85~93 (2017)
  29. United Nations, "World urbanization prospects, vol 2018" (2018)
  30. Van Den Berg, P., "A comparative study of urban park preferences in China and the Netherlands", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), pp.4632~ (2022)
  31. Wan, C., "Eliciting users’ preferences and values in urban parks: Evidence from analyzing social media data from Hong Kong", Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 62, pp.127172~ (2021)
  32. Xie, J., "Urban parks as green buffers during the COVID-19 pandemic", Sustainability, 12(17), pp.6751~ (2020)
  33. Zandersen, M., "A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe", Journal of Forest Economics, 15(1-2), pp.109~130 (2009)
  34. Zoh K. J., "A comparative analysis of park use culture between western countries and Korea", Environmental Studies, 45, pp.33~54 (2007)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)