본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기후변화를 고려한 농촌지역 그린빌리지의 태양에너지 활용에관한 경제성 분석

Economic Analysis of Rural Green-Village Planningwith Solar Energy considering Climate Change

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

This study aims to perform the economic analysis to the use of solar power facilities in rural villages considering the climate change scenario. IPCC climate change scenarios in the recently adopted the RCP scenarios (RCP8.5, RCP6.5, RCP4.5, RCP2.6) was used. By RCP scenarios, solar radiation, depending on the scenario in 2100, respectively, 3.6%, 2.5%, 1.9%, 1.1% was assumed to increase. From the economic analysis(payback period is 25 year) on 8 points of each province, in all cases of normal data and four RCP scenarios, at all points analyzed were NPV indicate a negative, BC ratio less than 1.0, respectively. In the case of Mokpo, Chunnam RCP8.5, BC ratio were found to be up to a 0.92, followed by 0.89 in the case of RCP8.5 in Jinju, Kyungnam shows, while the minimum was in Jeju. BC ratio is 1.0 or bigger, in order for the normal solar radiation data in Mokpo, Chonnam was the minimum that it takes 37 years. Similarly, in the case of RCP scenarios, 30 years in Mokpo, Chonnam RCP8.5 and 31 years in the cases of Jinju, Kyungnam and Jeonju, Cheonbuk RCP8.5 were analyzed. It was analyzed that RCP8.5 has the highest value. BC analysis models for each of the factors, the results of the sensitivity analysis, the initial installation costs, electricity sales price, discount rate in the order of economy showed higher sensitivity, and the rest factors showed lower changes. Although there are some differences of solar radiation by region, but in Korea most facilities in rural areas, the use of solar power was considered to be economical enough, considering change of several factors with high sensitivity, such as increasing of government subsidies for the solar power installation of the facility, rising oil prices due to a rise in electricity sales price, and a change in discount rate. In particular, when considering climate change scenarios, the use of solar energy for rural areas of the judgment that there was more economical.

Abstract

This study aims to perform the economic analysis to the use of solar power facilities in rural villages considering the climate change scenario. IPCC climate change scenarios in the recently adopted the RCP scenarios (RCP8.5, RCP6.5, RCP4.5, RCP2.6) was used. By RCP scenarios, solar radiation, depending on the scenario in 2100, respectively, 3.6%, 2.5%, 1.9%, 1.1% was assumed to increase. From the economic analysis(payback period is 25 year) on 8 points of each province, in all cases of normal data and four RCP scenarios, at all points analyzed were NPV indicate a negative, BC ratio less than 1.0, respectively. In the case of Mokpo, Chunnam RCP8.5, BC ratio were found to be up to a 0.92, followed by 0.89 in the case of RCP8.5 in Jinju, Kyungnam shows, while the minimum was in Jeju. BC ratio is 1.0 or bigger, in order for the normal solar radiation data in Mokpo, Chonnam was the minimum that it takes 37 years. Similarly, in the case of RCP scenarios, 30 years in Mokpo, Chonnam RCP8.5 and 31 years in the cases of Jinju, Kyungnam and Jeonju, Cheonbuk RCP8.5 were analyzed. It was analyzed that RCP8.5 has the highest value. BC analysis models for each of the factors, the results of the sensitivity analysis, the initial installation costs, electricity sales price, discount rate in the order of economy showed higher sensitivity, and the rest factors showed lower changes. Although there are some differences of solar radiation by region, but in Korea most facilities in rural areas, the use of solar power was considered to be economical enough, considering change of several factors with high sensitivity, such as increasing of government subsidies for the solar power installation of the facility, rising oil prices due to a rise in electricity sales price, and a change in discount rate. In particular, when considering climate change scenarios, the use of solar energy for rural areas of the judgment that there was more economical.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 기상청, "기후변화 시나리오 이해 및 활용사례집", ~ (2011)
  2. "기상청 기후변화정보센터"[URL]
  3. 김대식, "A Study on Economic Analysis of Rural Green-village Planning using Solar Energy", 한국농공학회논문집, 52(4), pp.27~34 (2010), 한국농공학회
  4. 김명철, "주거용 건물의 태양광 발전시스템 투자회수 기간 산정", 한국태양에너지학회 논문집, 27(2), pp.87~94 (2007), 한국태양에너지학회
  5. 김홍래, "우리나라 15개 다목적댐 유역별 A1B 기후변화 시나리오 분석", 생태와 환경, 44(2), pp.187~194 (2011), 한국하천호수학회
  6. IPCC 5차 평가보고서 대응을 위한 기후변화 시나리오 보고서, "국립기상연구소", ~ (2011)
  7. 권영아, "A1B 시나리오 자료를 이용한 우리나라 아열대 기후구 전망", 대한지리학회지, 42(3), pp.355~367 (2007), 대한지리학회
  8. 농촌마을 리모델링 기법개발에 관한 연구 -농촌마을 신재생에너지 활용방안 연구-, "농림부", ~ (2007)
  9. 백희정, "RCP 시나리오 와 HadGEM2-AO를 이용한 전지구 기후변화 전망", 한국기상학회 봄 학술대회 논문집, pp.23~24 (2012)
  10. 신현석, "RCP8. 5 시나리오를 이용한 안성천 유역의 유출특성 분석", 한국방재학회 학술발표대회지, pp.332~338 (2013)
  11. 안교상, "50kW급 계통연계형 태양광발전시스템 운전특성 분석", 한국태양에너지학회 학술발표대회논문집, pp.116~120 (1999)
  12. 우수민, "IPCC AR4 기후변화 시나리오에 따른 고해상도 전구모델 GME를 이용한 Time-Slice 실험", 한국기상학회 가을 학술대회 논문집, pp.150~151 (2008)
  13. 기초에너지 사용량 정립에 관한 연구, "에너지경제연구원", ~ (2007)
  14. 2011 에너지 총조사 보고서, "에너지경제연구원", ~ (2011)
  15. 예령, "A1B 기후변화 시나리오에 따른 대청댐 유역 토양 유실량 예측", 대한상하수도학회․한국물환경학회 2008공동 추계학술발표회 논문요약집, pp.33~34 (2008)
  16. 이관호, "환경비용을 고려한 재생에너지의 경제성 분석", 한국태양에너지학회 논문집, 24(3), pp.93~100 (2004), 한국태양에너지학회
  17. 이경주, "기후변화 시나리오에 따른 소양강 유역 강수량 규모축소에 관한 연구", 대한토목학회 정기학술대회, pp.1937~1940 (2010)
  18. 이조한, "RCP 기후변화 시나리오를 이용한 미래 해빙변화 전망", 한국기상학회 봄 학술대회 논문집, pp.81~82 (2012)
  19. "기후업무 관계기관 간 협혁회의 개최" (2012), 전주기상대[URL]
  20. 정제호, "기후변화시나리오에 따른 댐유역의 장기 수질변화 예측", 환경영향평가, 20(2), pp.107~121 (2011), 한국환경영향평가학회
  21. 강원지역의 지형을 고려한 태양에너지 산출에 대한 연구, "지준범", 강원발전연구원, ~ (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)