랜드스케이프 어바니즘 관점의 도시황무지 경관계획 평가항목 중요도 분석

Abstract

Background With the start of the Industrial Revolution in the mid-18th century, the development of cities brought about great changes in people's lives. The industrial revolution brought about a rapid flow of urbanization through technological innovation. Today, as urbanization progresses rapidly and industrialization develops, social economy and changing social systems expand, more and more wasteland and wasted resources are being created in the city. The landscape that is emerging through this urban phenomenon is called a 'wasteland landscape'. It undermines the ecological continuity, cultural continuity, and artistic aesthetics of the city, and acts as the biggest obstacle to the sustainable development of the city, and abolition is prominent among them. In the 1970s and 1980s, the West, including France and Germany, ended the industrialization process early and began to move toward "reverse industrialization." As a result, the wasteland was reborn as a new and dynamic place in the city through landscape design. In recent years, some excellent examples of utilizing the landscape ideology have reintegrated and established urban landscape resources, and development has been renewed through the renovation of wasteland. In this process, architecture aims to provide a unique way of thinking and design perspective for sustainable development of the city as a way to develop the city with landscape design, not the center of the city. Methods The research method clarified the concept of 'Landscape Urbanism' and defined its characteristics. He then explained the "wasteland" and "wasteland landscape," as well as reviewed the problems of the abandoned landscape in the process of urban development. In addition, the cases of three regions, New York High Line Park, Shanghai Bai Xi Park, and Seoul's Seoullo 7017, which were transformed into urban landscape spaces by wasteland, were explained based on the characteristics of "Landscape Parentism," and 21 evaluation indicators were created. AHP importance survey was conducted, and the data of the survey results were analyzed using SPSS24 to derive the weight of the evaluation index, and an evaluation standard was established to quantify the urban wasteland renovation according to the landscape reform theory. Result In order to solve the decision problem based on the landscape parent theory, a decision frame was created to analyze the multi-factor evaluation criteria using the AHP integrated analysis method that considers both quantitative and qualitative factors. As a result, the decision frame As a result, the decision frame includes in descending order: "Connection and diffusion of user flow", "Dynamic ecosystem ", "Connection with urban infrastructure", "Cultural collabora -tion role", "Multi-dimensional media connection", "Internal change of site boundary", "Connection of natural environmen -t", "Connection with urban environment", and "Connection". Conclusion It is of great significance to future urban development and landscape planning by reviewing the value of landscape theory applied to the evaluation of waste landscape planning projects and developing guidelines that can serve as criteria for deliberation validity for designers, managers, and reviewers. In addition, this study is expected to be able to be modified and expanded in subsequent studies due to insufficient verification and multi-field evaluation.