Incidental FonF in Adult EFL Classrooms - Participation Structure and Learner Uptake -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study investigated the distribution of incidental focus on form (FonF) occurring in intact EFL classrooms and its relationship with the participation structure (i.e., whole class/small group/one-on-one interactions) and learner uptake (successful uptake vs. unsuccessful uptake) across the types of FonF (reactive vs. preemptive FonF) and participation structure. The data from eleven hours of communicative lessons from five classes were analyzed according to the types of incidental FonF, participation structures, and learner uptake. The study found that reactive FonF took place more frequently than preemptive FonF in small group and one-on-one interactions while they occurred at a similar rate in whole class interactions. In addition, during whole class interactions, teachers and students initiated FonF at a similar rate, but, during small group and individual interactions, a majority of FonF was generated by students. When learner uptake was considered, students responded more successfully to preemptive FonF, especially FonF generated by themselves in all participation structures. However, in the case of reactive FonF, unsuccessful uptake took place more frequently than successful uptake in whole class interactions, whereas more successful uptake was observed than unsuccessful uptake in small group and one-on-one interactions. These results provided insights into the role of participation structure as an important mediator influencing the provision of FonF and the quality and quantity of uptake, which may eventually affect the opportunities for L2 development
Abstract
The present study investigated the distribution of incidental focus on form (FonF) occurring in intact EFL classrooms and its relationship with the participation structure (i.e., whole class/small group/one-on-one interactions) and learner uptake (successful uptake vs. unsuccessful uptake) across the types of FonF (reactive vs. preemptive FonF) and participation structure. The data from eleven hours of communicative lessons from five classes were analyzed according to the types of incidental FonF, participation structures, and learner uptake. The study found that reactive FonF took place more frequently than preemptive FonF in small group and one-on-one interactions while they occurred at a similar rate in whole class interactions. In addition, during whole class interactions, teachers and students initiated FonF at a similar rate, but, during small group and individual interactions, a majority of FonF was generated by students. When learner uptake was considered, students responded more successfully to preemptive FonF, especially FonF generated by themselves in all participation structures. However, in the case of reactive FonF, unsuccessful uptake took place more frequently than successful uptake in whole class interactions, whereas more successful uptake was observed than unsuccessful uptake in small group and one-on-one interactions. These results provided insights into the role of participation structure as an important mediator influencing the provision of FonF and the quality and quantity of uptake, which may eventually affect the opportunities for L2 development.
참고문헌 (47)
- Bastone, R., "Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis", pp.87~99 (2007), Oxford University Press
- Cazden, C., "Handbook of discourse processes", pp.165~197 (2003), Erlbaum
- Chaudron, C., "A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners'errors", Language Learning, 27, pp.29~46 (1997)
- Dilans, G., "Corrective feedback and L2 vocabulary development : Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom", Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, pp.787~816 (2010)
- Doughty, C., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.206~257 (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Doughty, C., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.197~261 (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Ellis, R., "Introduction : Investigating form-focused instruction", Language Learning, 51, pp.1~46 (2001)
- Ellis, R., "Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons", Language Learning, 51, pp.281~318 (2001)
- Ellis, R., "Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, pp.575~600 (2006)
- Han, Z-H., "Understanding second language process", pp.45~79 (2007), Multilingual Matters
- Johnson, K., "Understanding communication in second language classrooms" (1995), Cambridge University Press
- 김지현, "Effects of Recasts on Child EFL Learners’ Development of Regular and Irregular Past Tense Forms", 영어교육, 67(2), pp.3~26 (2012), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
- 김지현, "Feedback Opportunities and Interactional Context in Adult EFL Classrooms", Foreign Languages Education, 19(2), pp.1~26 (2012), 한국외국어교육학회[DOI]
- 김지현, "Written Corrective Feedback and Accuracy Development in EFL Classrooms: Types of Feedback and Errors", 교과교육학연구, 17(2), pp.441~460 (2013), 교과교육연구소
- Kim, J. H., "Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies", pp.269~297 (2007), Oxford University Press
- Li, S., "The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA : A meta-analysis", Language Learning, 60, pp.309~365 (2010)
- Lightbown, p., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.177~194 (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Loewen, S., "Incidental focus on form and second language learning", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, pp.361~386 (2005)
- Loewen, S., "Recasts in adults English L2 classrooms : Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness", Modern Language Journal, 90, pp.536~556 (2006)
- Long, M., "Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective", pp.39~52 (1991), John Benjamins
- Long, M., "Problems in SLA", pp.75~116 (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Lyster, R., "Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, pp.51~81 (1998)
- Lyster, R., "Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, pp.399~432 (2004)
- Lyster, R., "Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction", Language Learning, 59, pp.453~498 (2009)
- Lyster, R., "Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, pp.269~300 (2006)
- Lyster, R., "Corrective feedback and learner uptake : Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, pp.37~66 (1997)
- Lyster, R., "Oral feedback in classroom SLA", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, pp.265~302 (2010)
- Mackey, A., "How do learners perceive interactional feedback?", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, pp.71~497 (2000)
- Mackey, A., "Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies", pp.407~452 (2007), Oxford University Press
- Mackey, A., "Conversational interaction and second language development:Recasts, response, and red herrings?", Modern Language Journal, 82, pp.338~356 (1998)
- Nassaji, H., "Elicitation and reformulation and their relationship with learner repair in dyadic interaction", Language Learning, 57, pp.511~548 (2007)
- Nassaji, H., "Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness", Language Learning, 59, pp.411~452 (2009)
- Nassaji, H., "Participation structure and incidental focus on form in adult ESL classrooms", Language Learning, 63, pp.835~869 (2013)
- Oliver, R., "Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms", Modern Language Journal, 87, pp.519~533 (2003)
- Russell, J., "Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching", pp.131~164 (2006), A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega(Eds. ), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching(pp. 131-164). Amsterdam; John Benjamins
- Schmidt, R., "Attention and awareness in foreign language learning", pp.1~63 (1995), University of Hawaii Press
- Schmidt, R., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.3~32 (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Seedhouse, p., "The interactional architecture of the language classroom : A conversation analysis perspective." (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Sheen, Y., "Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings", Language Teaching Research, 8, pp.263~300 (2004)
- Sheen, Y., "Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning", Language Learning, 58, pp.835~874 (2008)
- Spada, N., "The communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme(COLT)." (1995), The National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research
- Swain, M., "Principles and practice in the study of language: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson", pp.125~144 (1995), Oxford University Press
- Swain, M., "Sociocultural theory and second language learning", pp.97~114 (2000), Oxford University Press
- Tarone, E., "Still wrestling with context in interlanguage theory", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, pp.182~198 (2000)
- Trofimovich, P., "Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies", pp.171~195 (2007), Oxford University Press
- VanPatten, B., "Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research" (1996), Ablex
- VanPatten, B., "Processing instruction" (2004), Erlbaum