Evidence-based approaches for establishing the 2015 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans (KDRIs), a set of reference intake values, have served as a basis for guiding a balanced diet that promotes health and prevents disease in the general Korean population. In the process of developing DRIs, a systematic review has played an important role in helping the DRI committees make evidence-based and transparent decisions for updating the next DRIs. Thus, the 2015 KDRI steering committee applied the systematic review framework to the revision process of the KDRIs. The purpose of this article is to summarize the revision process for the 2015 KDRIs by focusing on the systematic review framework. MATERIALS/METHODS: The methods used to develop the systematic review framework for 2015 KDRIs followed the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center. The framework for systematic review of the 2015 KDRIs comprised of the 3 following steps: (1) development of an analytic framework and refinement of key questions and search terms; (2) literature search and data extraction; and, (3) appraisal of the literature and summarizing the results. RESULTS: A total of 203,237 studies were retrieved through the above procedure, with 2,324 of these studies included in the analysis. General information, main results, comments of reviewers, and results of quality assessment were extracted and organized by study design. The average points of quality appraisals were 3.0 (range, 0-5) points for intervention, 6.1 (0-9) points for cohort, 6.0 (3-9) points for nested case-control, 5.4 (1-8) points for case-control, 14.6 (0-22) points for cross-sectional studies, and 7.0 (0-11) points for reviews. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic review helped to establish the 2015 KDRIs as a useful tool for evidence-based approach. Collaborative efforts to improve the framework for systematic review should be continued for future KDRIs.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans (KDRIs), a set of reference intake values, have served as a basis for guiding a balanced diet that promotes health and prevents disease in the general Korean population. In the process of developing DRIs, a systematic review has played an important role in helping the DRI committees make evidence-based and transparent decisions for updating the next DRIs. Thus, the 2015 KDRI steering committee applied the systematic review framework to the revision process of the KDRIs. The purpose of this article is to summarize the revision process for the 2015 KDRIs by focusing on the systematic review framework. MATERIALS/METHODS: The methods used to develop the systematic review framework for 2015 KDRIs followed the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center. The framework for systematic review of the 2015 KDRIs comprised of the 3 following steps: (1) development of an analytic framework and refinement of key questions and search terms; (2) literature search and data extraction; and, (3) appraisal of the literature and summarizing the results. RESULTS: A total of 203,237 studies were retrieved through the above procedure, with 2,324 of these studies included in the analysis. General information, main results, comments of reviewers, and results of quality assessment were extracted and organized by study design. The average points of quality appraisals were 3.0 (range, 0-5) points for intervention, 6.1 (0-9) points for cohort, 6.0 (3-9) points for nested case-control, 5.4 (1-8) points for case-control, 14.6 (0-22) points for cross-sectional studies, and 7.0 (0-11) points for reviews. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic review helped to establish the 2015 KDRIs as a useful tool for evidence-based approach. Collaborative efforts to improve the framework for systematic review should be continued for future KDRIs.
참고문헌 (30)
- Murphy SP, "History of nutrition : the long road leading to the Dietary Reference Intakes for the United States and Canada", Adv Nutr, 7, pp.157~168 (2016)
- National Research Council, "Recommended Dietary Allowances" (1941), The National Academies Press
- National Research Council, "Recommended Dietary Allowances", pp.21~ (1989), The National Academies Press
- Institute of Medicine, "Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate", pp.3~ (2004), The National Academies Press
- Institute of Medicine, "The Development of DRIs 1994-2004: Lessons Learned and New Challenges: Workshop Summary", pp.2~ (2008), The National Academies Press
- King JC, "Nutrient intake values (NIVs): a recommended terminology and framework for the derivation of values", Food Nutr Bull, 28, pp.S16~S26 (2007)
- Paik HY, "Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans(KDRIs)", Asia Pac J Clin Nutr, 17, pp.416~419 (2008)
- The Korean Nutrition Society, "Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans 2005", The Korean Nutrition Society, ~ (2005)
- Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans 2015", The Korean Nutrition Society, ~ (2015)
- Atkinson SA, "Defining the process of Dietary Reference Intakes:framework for the United States and Canada", Am J Clin Nutr, 94, pp.655S~657S (2011)
- The Korean Nutrition Society, "Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans 2010", The Korean Nutrition Society, ~ (2010)
- Institute of Medicine, "Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D", pp.523~1065 (2011), The National Academies Press
- Chung M, "Vitamin D and calcium: a systematic review of health outcomes", Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep), 183, pp.1~420 (2009)
- Lichtenstein AH, "Application of systematic review methodology to the field of nutrition", J Nutr, 138, pp.2297~2306 (2008)
- Russell R, "Opportunities and challenges in conducting systematic reviews to support the development of nutrient reference values : vitamin A as an example", Am J Clin Nutr, 89, pp.728~733 (2009)
- da Costa Santos CM, "The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search", Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, 15, pp.508~511 (2007)
- Croswell JM, "Clinical trial design and evidence-based outcomes in the study of liver diseases", J Hepatol, 50, pp.817~826 (2009)
- Joung HJ, "Nutrition in Public Health", pp.184~ (2013), Yangseowon
- Chung M, "Systematic review to support the development of nutrient reference intake values : challenges and solutions", Am J Clin Nutr, 92, pp.273~276 (2010)
- Jadad AR, "Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary?", Control Clin Trials, 17, pp.1~12 (1996)
- "The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses" (2009)[URL]
- "Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology" (2009)[URL]
- Shea BJ, "Development of AMSTAR : a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews", BMC Med Res Methodol, 7, pp.10~ (2007)
- Yetley EA, "Options for basing Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) on chronic disease endpoints: report from a joint US-", Canadian-sponsored working group, 2017, pp.105, 249S~285S
- "Framework for DRI development t: components “Known”and Components “To Be Explored”" (2008)[URL]
- National Academies of Sciences, "Global Harmonization of Methodological Approaches to Nutrient Intake Recommendations", Proceedings of a Workshop, pp.57~79 (2018), The National Academies Press
- 2014 Report on Support Project for Establishing 2015 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, "The Korean Nutrition Society", The Korean Nutrition Society, ~ (2014)
- 2015 Report on Support Project for Establishing 2015 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, "The Korean Nutrition Society", The Korean Nutrition Society, ~ (2015)
- 2013 Report on Support Project for Establishing 2015 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, "The Korean Nutrition Society", The Korean Nutrition Society, ~ (2013)
- Report on the Plan for Ensuring Efficiency in Revision and Application of Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, "The Korean Nutrition Society", The Korean Nutrition Society, ~ (2017)