소현세자의 체질과 사망원인분석
The Crown Prince Sohyen's Constitution on the Basis of Sasang Constitituional Medicine and Cause of Death
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
1. Objectives The Crown Prince Sohyen(1612-1645) has been believed to have been poisoned to death because of the political conflict with the King Injo. However, the Crown Prince Sohyen who was So-yangin(SY type) didn't be treated properly at that time. This paper is supposed to explain the reason why he died by reference. 2. Methods The prescription which was made out to the Crown Prince Sohyen is analyzed, based on the Sasang Constitutional Medicine(SCM) through Shimyang-ilgy and Ulyudongkung-ilgy. 3. Results 1) In the case of the prescription where So-yang medical stuffs were contained a lot or Gunyak(the main madical stuff) was So-yang one, the Crown Prince Sohyen was better, while that of Tae-eum and So-eum medical stuffs didn't work. Therefore, the Crown Prince Sohyen can be considered So-yangin. 2) The So-yangin's symptom was misunderstood as Hakjil and treated, which could lead him to be put to death. 4. Conclusions The Crown Prince Sohyen is supposed to be Soyang-in(SY type), and accordingly the So-yangin's symptom was misunderstood as Hakjil and treated, which could cause him to pass away.
Abstract
1. Objectives The Crown Prince Sohyen(1612-1645) has been believed to have been poisoned to death because of the political conflict with the King Injo. However, the Crown Prince Sohyen who was So-yangin(SY type) didn't be treated properly at that time. This paper is supposed to explain the reason why he died by reference. 2. Methods The prescription which was made out to the Crown Prince Sohyen is analyzed, based on the Sasang Constitutional Medicine(SCM) through Shimyang-ilgy and Ulyudongkung-ilgy. 3. Results 1) In the case of the prescription where So-yang medical stuffs were contained a lot or Gunyak(the main madical stuff) was So-yang one, the Crown Prince Sohyen was better, while that of Tae-eum and So-eum medical stuffs didn't work. Therefore, the Crown Prince Sohyen can be considered So-yangin. 2) The So-yangin's symptom was misunderstood as Hakjil and treated, which could lead him to be put to death. 4. Conclusions The Crown Prince Sohyen is supposed to be Soyang-in(SY type), and accordingly the So-yangin's symptom was misunderstood as Hakjil and treated, which could cause him to pass away.
참고문헌 (13)
- 金龍德, "朝鮮後期思想史硏究", pp.425~435 (1977), 을유문화사
- 박성순, "선비의 배반", pp.158~163 (2004), 고즈윈
- 서정우, "사건과 인물로 읽는 이야기 조선왕조사", pp.216~228 (1996), 푸른숲
- 이덕일, "누가 왕을 죽였는가", pp.71~108 (1998), 푸른역사
- 李迎春, "朝鮮後期 王位繼承 硏究", pp.186~190 (1998), 集文堂
- 朝鮮後期 王位繼承의 정통성논쟁 硏究, "李迎春", 韓國精神文化硏究院, 154~164 (1994)
- 김종덕, "소현세자 병증과 치료에 대한 연구", pp.29~79 (2007), 奎章閣
- "『瀋陽日記』, 규장각복사본", ~
- "『乙酉東宮日記』, 규장각복사본", ~
- 李濟馬, "東醫壽世保元" (1998), 대성문화사
- 許浚, "東醫寶鑑" (1988), 驪江出版社
- 국사편찬위원회, "朝鮮王朝實錄" (1955), 국사편찬위원회
- 李植, "澤堂集" (1991), 景仁文化社