본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

「로미오와 줄리엣」을 ‘순진하게’ 읽는 세 가지 관점

Three “Innocent” Questions on Romeo and Juliet

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This essay responds to three hypothetically innocent questions that uninformed readers might have on Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, a tragedy of which persistent popularity is said to be found in its aesthetic elevation of untainted, unworldly love of two innocent hearts. Those questions are primarily concerned with (1) the authenticity of the family feud as an undoubted background on which the entire tragedy of Romeo and Juliet is supposed to stand, (2) the thematic relevance of the exceptionally frequent use of the religious word “holy” to the story proper, and (3) the problem of Romeo’s obsessive fascination with visual beauty of women. Answers to these questions, I argue, facilitate the enlightened reading of the drama. The importance the conventional criticisms attach to the “ancient grudge” between the Montagues and the Capulets is more highlighted than it deserves, for the diverse textual evidence hints at the probability that the old bloody edge of the mutual antagonism has been quite blunted by the passage of time. However, this subdued antagonism does not necessarily diminish the play’s tragic vision; in fact, it heightens the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, as it provides an ironic dimension to their untimely death. The habitual use of the word “holy” serves as a conceptual lens through which one can see the systematic evil embodied in the destructive hostility between the two powerful households and the political and religious helplessness of the dignified personages in Veronian society. This perspective enables an interpretation that the tragedy of this drama hinges not so much on individual hamartia as on collective corruption of society. Even though Romeo’s vulnerability to the visual attraction may be quite regrettable, there is a sense in which it largely partakes of the early modern preoccupation with the deceptive power of appearances. However, in Romeo and Juliet the deceptive power of appearances should be felt on the collective and communal rather than on individual level, an important dramatic aspect that makes Romeo and Juliet particularly hopeless lovers.

Abstract

This essay responds to three hypothetically innocent questions that uninformed readers might have on Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, a tragedy of which persistent popularity is said to be found in its aesthetic elevation of untainted, unworldly love of two innocent hearts. Those questions are primarily concerned with (1) the authenticity of the family feud as an undoubted background on which the entire tragedy of Romeo and Juliet is supposed to stand, (2) the thematic relevance of the exceptionally frequent use of the religious word “holy” to the story proper, and (3) the problem of Romeo’s obsessive fascination with visual beauty of women. Answers to these questions, I argue, facilitate the enlightened reading of the drama. The importance the conventional criticisms attach to the “ancient grudge” between the Montagues and the Capulets is more highlighted than it deserves, for the diverse textual evidence hints at the probability that the old bloody edge of the mutual antagonism has been quite blunted by the passage of time. However, this subdued antagonism does not necessarily diminish the play’s tragic vision; in fact, it heightens the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, as it provides an ironic dimension to their untimely death. The habitual use of the word “holy” serves as a conceptual lens through which one can see the systematic evil embodied in the destructive hostility between the two powerful households and the political and religious helplessness of the dignified personages in Veronian society. This perspective enables an interpretation that the tragedy of this drama hinges not so much on individual hamartia as on collective corruption of society. Even though Romeo’s vulnerability to the visual attraction may be quite regrettable, there is a sense in which it largely partakes of the early modern preoccupation with the deceptive power of appearances. However, in Romeo and Juliet the deceptive power of appearances should be felt on the collective and communal rather than on individual level, an important dramatic aspect that makes Romeo and Juliet particularly hopeless lovers.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Asimov, Isaac, "Asimov’s Guide to Shakespeare" (1970), Gramercy Books
  2. Bloom, Harold, "Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human" (1998), Riverhead Books
  3. Brooke, Arthur, "Brooke’s Romeus and Juliet: Being the Original of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet" (1908), U of Michigan Library
  4. Frye, Northrop, "Northrop Frye on Shakespeare" (1986), Yale U Press
  5. Garber, Marjorie, "Shakespeare After All" (2004), Pantheon Books
  6. Herbert, George, "The Complete English Works of George Herbert" (1995), Alfred A. Knopf
  7. Howard, Jean E, "The Stage and Social Struggle in Early Modern England" (1993), Routledge
  8. Lewis, C. S, "The Collected Letters of C. S. Lewis: Family Letters 1905-1931. Vol.1" (2004), HaperCollins
  9. William Shakespeare, "Romeo + Juliet, Screenplay by Craig Pearce. Dir. Baz Luhrmann. Perf. Leonardo DiCaprio, Claire Danes, and Pete Postlethwaite" (1996), Twentieth Century Fox Film
  10. Shakespeare, William, "Romeo and Juliet" (2003), Cambridge U Press
  11. Schreiner, Susan E, "Appearance and Reality in Luther, Montaigne, and Shakespeare", The Journal of Religion, 83(3), pp.345~380 (2003)
  12. Thomas, Keith, "Religion and the Decline of Magic" (1971), Charles Scribner’s Sons
  13. Voragine, Jacobus de, "The Golden Legend: Reading on Saints. 2 vols" (1993), Princeton U Press
  14. Weinberger, Jerry, "Pious Princes and Red-Hot Lovers: The Politics of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet", The Journal of Politics, 65(2), pp.350~375 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)