시나리오 접근법을 통한중국어 요청 화행의 유형 및 특징 분석 - 관습적 간접 화행을 중심으로 -
Pattern & Characteristic Analysis of Chinese Request Speech Act Through the Scenario Approach - Focused on conventionalized indirect speech acts
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research has taken notice of the speech act, in that it is not always used as the imperative form, but also used for various sentence forms such as the descriptive and interrogative, as well as being a proper pattern of modality marker. Therefore, this paper has tried to explain the non-consistency phenomenon (the so-called indirect speech act), which has existed in the speech act of Chinese between the pattern (type of sentence) and its meaning through the request scenario model of Panther & Thornburg (1998). There is not only a predicted, non-conventionalized indirect speech, which depends entirely on the context and speech act environment, among the requests of indirect speech act. There is the common speech act medium, used from the cross-linguistic perspective, and the universal mechanism for the speech act being implemented. Of course, there are slight differences in each language in that such a medium is actualized in a material way. Therefore, this paper has revealed the pattern and characteristics of each pattern of request speech act in Mandarin Chinese through the review of usage pattern of requested speech act. As a result of the analysis, there are some cases of request speech act implemented as a single medium of speech act, which is a part of the manner element being relevant to Chinese request speech act of request scenario of "Before-Core-Result-After", and there are several cases in which each of the manner elements is relevant to more than two parts of a scenario that have been actualized in a single speech act, as complex mediums of speech act which implements the request speech act.
Abstract
This research has taken notice of the speech act, in that it is not always used as the imperative form, but also used for various sentence forms such as the descriptive and interrogative, as well as being a proper pattern of modality marker. Therefore, this paper has tried to explain the non-consistency phenomenon (the so-called indirect speech act), which has existed in the speech act of Chinese between the pattern (type of sentence) and its meaning through the request scenario model of Panther & Thornburg (1998). There is not only a predicted, non-conventionalized indirect speech, which depends entirely on the context and speech act environment, among the requests of indirect speech act. There is the common speech act medium, used from the cross-linguistic perspective, and the universal mechanism for the speech act being implemented. Of course, there are slight differences in each language in that such a medium is actualized in a material way. Therefore, this paper has revealed the pattern and characteristics of each pattern of request speech act in Mandarin Chinese through the review of usage pattern of requested speech act. As a result of the analysis, there are some cases of request speech act implemented as a single medium of speech act, which is a part of the manner element being relevant to Chinese request speech act of request scenario of "Before-Core-Result-After", and there are several cases in which each of the manner elements is relevant to more than two parts of a scenario that have been actualized in a single speech act, as complex mediums of speech act which implements the request speech act.
참고문헌 (20)
- 강소영, "중국어의 화행별 공손 표현 연구", 석사, 중국어교육, pp.2004
- 고성환, "국어 명령문에 대한 연구" (2003), 역락
- 김묘희, "영어 명령문 구조에서 시제 핵의 존재 유무", 석사, pp.2014
- 김병건, "한국어 명령 수행문의 유형과 특징", 인문과학연구, (41), pp.109~130 (2014), 인문과학연구소
- 김현철, "현대중국어 완곡 표현 연구", 중국어문학논집, (58), pp.235~263 (2009), 중국어문학연구회
- 박재승, "조동사‘能’과 ‘可以’의 기능 비교 연구 - 양태범주를 중심으로", 중국연구, 55, pp.47~65 (2012), 중국연구소[DOI]
- 박재연, "양태와 관습적 간접 화행의 환유적 연계- 요청 화행을 중심으로 -", 國語學, (73), pp.69~108 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- 윤상희, "祈使句와 명령문의 相異性과 특징에 대한 비교연구", 중국어문학논집, (86), pp.249~273 (2014), 중국어문학연구회
- 이명희, "한국어와 중국어의 요청 화행 대조 연구", 이중언어학, (42), pp.103~133 (2010), 이중언어학회
- 이성은, "간접화행 이해의 메커니즘에 대하여", 석사, 독어학, pp.2003
- 이정민, "의미구조의 표상과 실현" (2000), 소화
- 이준희, "명령문의 간접 화행", 한국어 의미학, 8 (2001)
- 정민주, "한국어 요청 화행 표현 연구", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2003
- Austin,J.L., "How to do things with words" (1962), Oxford University Press
- Heine, Bernd, "Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework" (1991), The University of Chicago Press
- Palmer,F.R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Panther,K.U., "A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 30 (1998)
- Panther,K.U., "Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing" (2003), John Benjamins
- Sadock,J.M., "Language Typology and Syntactic Structure, Vol. 1:Clause Structure", pp.155~196 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Searle,J.R., "Indirect speech acts, Syntax and Semantics 3" (1975), Academic Press
