한국형 체외진단제품 품목 및 등급분류 체계 제안
A Draft Proposal for Korean Classification and Coding System for In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
배경: 잘못된 검사 결과는 개인 및 공중보건에 위해를 가할 수 있으므로, 의료기기국제조화기구(Global Harmonization Task Force,GHTF)는 체외진단제품에 대한 별도의 규제체계를 권장하고 있다. 그러나 우리나라는 비록 체외진단분석기와 일부의 시약을 의료기기법과 약사법으로 관리하고 있기는 하지만, 상당수의 시약은규제되고 있지 않다. 본 연구에서는 체외진단제품에 대하여 우리나라의 포괄적인 품목 및 등급 분류 체계를 제안하고자 하였다. 방법: 초안 작성을 위하여 우리나라의 보험분류 현황과 의료기기국제조화기구, 미국, 일본, 캐나다, 호주 및 유럽의 자료를 검토하였다. 초안은 전문가 자문회의와 공개간담회를 통해 의견을 수렴하였다. 결과: 체외진단제품의 등급은 개인위해도(IR)와 공중위해도(PR)에 따라 1등급(낮은 IR과 낮은 PR), 2등급(중등도 IR과 낮은 PR), 3등급(높은 IR과/혹은 중등도 PR), 4등급(높은 IR과 높은 PR)으로분류하였다. 국내 진단검사의학과 검사실 현황을 반영하여 체외진단분석기, 체외진단시약 및 기타 검사실범용장비들을 분류하고, 7자리(alphabet D + 2 + 3 + 2)로 코드화 하였다. 결론: 본 연구의 체외진단제품 품목 및 등급분류(안)은 국내 체외진단제품을 적절히 관리하는 데 도움을 줄 것이다.
Abstract
Background: The Global harmonization task force (GHTF) recommends a separate regulation system for in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDD),because false test results can pose a risk to individual and/or public health. However, in Korea, many reagents for IVDD are not monitored, although IVD analyzers and some reagents are monitored under the Medical Device Act and Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, respectively. Our aim was to propose a draft for a Korean coding and classification system for IVDD. Methods: For preparing the draft, we reviewed the Korean Current Procedural Terminology for Health Insurance and principles of the coding and classification system for IVDD of the GHTF, the USA, Japan, Canada, Australia, and the EU. The draft was reviewed by consultants from relevant societies, such as Korean Medical Association, Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine, The Korea Association of Medical Technologists, and Korea Association for Diagnostic Laboratory Reagents, and was then publicly discussed at a conference. Results: IVDD were classified into 4 classes on the basis of the risks they pose to individual (IR) and public health (PR): class 1 (low IR and low PR), class 2 (moderate IR and low PR), class 3 (high IR and/or moderate PR), and class 4 (high IR and high PR). IVD analyzers, reagents and other general laboratory equipments were categorized and coded using the letter D and 7 (2+3+2) digits. Conclusions: This draft for the Korean IVDD classification and coding system could be used for effective management and regulation of IVDD in Korea.
참고문헌 (11)
- Principles of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices classification, "Study Group 1 of the Global Harmonization Task Force", Global harmonization task force, ~, pp.GHTF (2008), SG1[DOI]
- The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine, "Laboratory medicine. 4th ed" (2009), E-Public
- "Product classification" (2012)[URL]
- "Notice of No. 0401031 from Japan drug and food administration", April 1st 2005, For common name of in vitro diagnostics, ~
- "Classification of IVD medical devices" (2011)[URL]
- "Guidance for the risk based classification system of in vitro diagnostic devices" (1998)[URL]
- "European standards In vitro diagnostic medical devices (98/79/EC)" (2012)[URL]
- A study on regulations of USA, Europe and Japan for in-vitro diagnostic devices, "Sohn HJ", Korea Food and Drug Administration, ~, pp.05092 SAENUIPYEONG 352 (2005)
- Studies on international harmonization for management of in vitro diagnostics, "Park YJ", Korea Food and Drug Administration, ~, pp.09121 CHEOMDANPYEONG 393 (2009)
- A study of a regulatory system for medical devices based on classification, "Kim Y.", Korea Food and Drug Administration, ~, pp.07112 KITASA 795 (2007)
- "Australian national notifiable diseases case definitions" (2011)[URL]
