重思《齐物论》之“吾丧我”、“莫若以明”及“物化”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
‘I lost myself’, ‘the use of brightness’ and ‘the transformation of things’ in the Leveling All Things are the three important opinions which have aroused heated discussions. In this paper, I will rethink these three viewpoints, and the conclusion of my analysis is, the meaning of ‘I’ in ‘I lost myself ’ contains physical and spiritual part. The author mentioned the pipes of Earth, the pipes of human beings and the pipes of Heaven as a method to describe the logical relationship between ‘I’ and the physical and spiritual part in ‘myself’. As for ‘ the use of brightness ’ and ‘ the transformation of things ’ , I think they are the two ways to realize eliminating ‘ myself ’ from ‘I’, and to reach the level of true ‘I’ finally. In this process, mentioning ‘the use of brightness’ for three times is focusing on the three reasons that the preconceptions are formed, and the discussion of ‘the transformation of things’ echoes the argument about ‘the use of brightness’ from an objective perspective.
Abstract
‘I lost myself’, ‘the use of brightness’ and ‘the transformation of things’ in the Leveling All Things are the three important opinions which have aroused heated discussions. In this paper, I will rethink these three viewpoints, and the conclusion of my analysis is, the meaning of ‘I’ in ‘I lost myself ’ contains physical and spiritual part. The author mentioned the pipes of Earth, the pipes of human beings and the pipes of Heaven as a method to describe the logical relationship between ‘I’ and the physical and spiritual part in ‘myself’. As for ‘ the use of brightness ’ and ‘ the transformation of things ’ , I think they are the two ways to realize eliminating ‘ myself ’ from ‘I’, and to reach the level of true ‘I’ finally. In this process, mentioning ‘the use of brightness’ for three times is focusing on the three reasons that the preconceptions are formed, and the discussion of ‘the transformation of things’ echoes the argument about ‘the use of brightness’ from an objective perspective.
참고문헌 (16)
- 郭庆藩, "庄子集释" (2004), 中华书局
- 钱穆, "庄子纂笺" (1985), 台北东大图书股份有限公司
- 李勉, "庄子总论及分篇评注" (1973), 台湾商务印书馆
- 陈鼓应, "庄子今注今译" (1983), 中华书局
- 高柏园, "庄子内七篇思想研究" (1992), 文津出版社
- 王先谦, "庄子集解：庄子集解内篇补正" (1987), 中华书局
- 王叔岷, "庄子校诠（上）", pp.48~ (2007), 中华书局
- 钟泰, "庄子发微" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 牟宗三, "才性与玄理", pp.198~ (1975), 台北学生书局
- 傅佩荣, "傅佩荣解读庄子" (2001), 立绪文化事业有限公司
- 杨国荣, "庄子的思想世界" (2006), 北京大学出版社
- 曹础基, "庄子浅注" (2000), 中华书局
- 崔大华, "庄子歧解", pp.108~109 (1988), 中州古籍出版社
- 慧远, "形尽神不灭论. in: 收入《弘明集》卷5", pp.32~ (1991), 上海古籍出版社
- 谢祥皓, "庄子序跋论评辑要", pp.327~ (2001), 湖北教育出版社
- 章启群, "论郭象对<庄子>自然观的超越", 原道, 6 (1999)