본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Maxillary protraction using skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics in Skeletal Class III patients

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

The aim of this case report is to describe the treatment of a patient with skeletal Class III malocclusion with maxillary retrognathia using skeletal anchorage devices and intermaxillary elastics. Miniplates were inserted between the mandibular lateral incisor and canine teeth on both sides in a male patient aged 14 years 5 months. Self-drilling mini-implants (1.6 mm diameter, 10 mm length) were installed between the maxillary second premolar and molar teeth, and Class III elastics were used between the miniplates and miniscrews. On treatment completion, an increase in the projection of the maxilla relative to the cranial base (2.7 mm) and significant improvement of the facial profile were observed. Slight maxillary counterclockwise (1o) and mandibular clockwise (3.3o) rotations were also observed. Maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics was effective in correcting a case of Skeletal Class III malocclusion without dentoalveolar side effects. [Korean J Orthod 2015;45(2):95-101]

Abstract

The aim of this case report is to describe the treatment of a patient with skeletal Class III malocclusion with maxillary retrognathia using skeletal anchorage devices and intermaxillary elastics. Miniplates were inserted between the mandibular lateral incisor and canine teeth on both sides in a male patient aged 14 years 5 months. Self-drilling mini-implants (1.6 mm diameter, 10 mm length) were installed between the maxillary second premolar and molar teeth, and Class III elastics were used between the miniplates and miniscrews. On treatment completion, an increase in the projection of the maxilla relative to the cranial base (2.7 mm) and significant improvement of the facial profile were observed. Slight maxillary counterclockwise (1o) and mandibular clockwise (3.3o) rotations were also observed. Maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics was effective in correcting a case of Skeletal Class III malocclusion without dentoalveolar side effects. [Korean J Orthod 2015;45(2):95-101]

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Klempner LS, "Early orthopedic Class III treatment with a modified tandem appliance", J Clin Orthod, 37, pp.218~223 (2003)
  2. Chun YS, "A new appliance for orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion", J Clin Orthod, 33, pp.705~711 (1999)
  3. Enacar A, "Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 123, pp.571~577 (2003)
  4. Kircelli BH, "Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored face mask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.440~449 (2008)
  5. De Clerck HJ, "Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.2123~2129 (2009)
  6. Cevidanes L, "Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.799~806 (2010)
  7. Ge YS, "Dentofacial effects of two facemask therapies for maxillary protraction", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.1083~1091 (2012)
  8. De Clerck EE, "Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.1010~1013 (2011)
  9. Koh SD, "Comparison of skeletal anchored facemask and tooth-borne facemask according to vertical skeletal pattern and growth stage", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.628~633 (2014)
  10. Cha BK, "Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.99~112 (2011)
  11. Ahn HW, "Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.935~941 (2012)
  12. Kaya D, "Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions;a pilot study", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.639~646 (2011)
  13. De Clerck H, "Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138, pp.577~581 (2010)
  14. Sar C, "Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.636~649 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

New approach of maxillary protraction using modified C-palatal plates in Class III patients국윤아, 김성훈, Jae Hyun Park, Ki Beom Kim, Kyu-Rhim Chung, Mohamed Bayome대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2015 · 제45권 제4호Zygomatic miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion: A controlled clinical trialAlime Sema Yüksel, Erdal Bozkaya, Süleyman Bozkaya대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2017 · 제47권 제2호Maxillary protraction using customized mini-plates for anchorage in an adolescent girl with skeletal Class III malocclusionBai Yuxing, Chang Qiao, Liang Shuran, Wang Fan, Wang Hongmei, Xie Xianju대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2020 · 제50권 제5호Correction of late adolescent skeletal Class III usingthe Alt-RAMEC protocol and skeletal anchorageMuhammed Hilmi Büyükçavuş, Ömer Faruk Sari, Yavuz Findik대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2023 · 제53권 제1호Class III nonsurgical treatment using indirect skeletal anchorage: A case report임원희, 전윤식, 최준영대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2008 · 제38권 제1호Does surgically assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics affect the pharyngeal airway? A retrospective, long-term studyElvan Onem Ozbilen, Hanife Nuray Yilmaz, Nazan Küçükkeleş, Petros Papaefthymiou대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2023 · 제53권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)