본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Demographic and Survivorship Disparities in Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer in the United States

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: To examine survivorship disparities in demographic factors and risk status for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), which accounts for more than 75% of all urinary bladder cancers, but is highly curable with early identification and treatment. Methods: We used the US National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries over a 19-year period (1988-2006) to examine survivorship disparities in age, sex, race/ethnicity, and marital status of patients and risk status classified by histologic grade, stage, size of tumor, and number of multiple primary tumors among NMIBC patients (n=29 326). We applied Kaplan- Meier (K-M) and Cox proportional hazard methods for survival analysis. Results: Among all urinary bladder cancer patients, the majority of NMIBCs were in male (74.1%), non-Latino white (86.7%), married (67.8%), and low-risk (37.6%) to intermediate-risk (44.8%) patients. The mean age was 68 years. Survivorship (in median life years) was highest for non-Latino white (5.4 years), married (5.4 years), and low-risk (5.7 years) patients (K-M analysis, p<0.001). We found significantly lower survivorship for elderly, male (female hazard ratio [HR], 0.96), Latino (HR, 1.20), and unmarried (married HR, 0.93) patients. Conclusions: Survivorship disparities were ubiquitous across age, sex, race/ethnicity, and marital status groups. Non-white, unmarried, and elderly patients had significantly shorter survivorship. The implications of these findings include the need for a heightened focus on health policy and more organized efforts to improve access to care in order to increase the chances of survival for all patients.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine survivorship disparities in demographic factors and risk status for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), which accounts for more than 75% of all urinary bladder cancers, but is highly curable with early identification and treatment. Methods: We used the US National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries over a 19-year period (1988-2006) to examine survivorship disparities in age, sex, race/ethnicity, and marital status of patients and risk status classified by histologic grade, stage, size of tumor, and number of multiple primary tumors among NMIBC patients (n=29 326). We applied Kaplan- Meier (K-M) and Cox proportional hazard methods for survival analysis. Results: Among all urinary bladder cancer patients, the majority of NMIBCs were in male (74.1%), non-Latino white (86.7%), married (67.8%), and low-risk (37.6%) to intermediate-risk (44.8%) patients. The mean age was 68 years. Survivorship (in median life years) was highest for non-Latino white (5.4 years), married (5.4 years), and low-risk (5.7 years) patients (K-M analysis, p<0.001). We found significantly lower survivorship for elderly, male (female hazard ratio [HR], 0.96), Latino (HR, 1.20), and unmarried (married HR, 0.93) patients. Conclusions: Survivorship disparities were ubiquitous across age, sex, race/ethnicity, and marital status groups. Non-white, unmarried, and elderly patients had significantly shorter survivorship. The implications of these findings include the need for a heightened focus on health policy and more organized efforts to improve access to care in order to increase the chances of survival for all patients.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Anastasiadis A, "Best practice in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer", Ther Adv Urol, 4(1), pp.13~32 (2012)[DOI]
  2. "Cancer stat facts: bladder cancer"[URL]
  3. "Survival rates for bladder cancer"[URL]
  4. Cheng L, "Histologic grading of urothelial carcinoma: a reappraisal", Hum Pathol, 43(12), pp.2097~2108 (2012)[DOI]
  5. MacLennan GT, "Histologic grading of noninvasive papillary urothelial neoplasms", Eur Urol, 51(4), pp.889~897 (2007)[DOI]
  6. Kirkali Z, "Bladder cancer: epidemiology, staging and grading, and diagnosis", Urology, 66(6 Suppl 1), pp.4~34 (2005)
  7. Babjuk M, "EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013", Eur Urol, 64(4), pp.639~653 (2013)[DOI]
  8. Bobinski J, "EORTC risk tables--a new diagnostic tool in urology", Pol Merkur Lekarski, 27(162), pp.524~528 (2009)
  9. Barton MK, "High morbidity and mortality found for high-risk, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer", CA Cancer J Clin, 63(6), pp.371~372 (2013)[DOI]
  10. Snyder C, "Patterns of care for the treatment of bladder cancer", J Urol, 169(5), pp.1697~1701 (2003)[DOI]
  11. Hollenbeck BK, "Racial differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with early stage bladder cancer", Cancer, 116(1), pp.50~56 (2010)
  12. Underwood W 3rd, "Gender and geographic influence on the racial disparity in bladder cancer mortality in the US", J Am Coll Surg, 202(2), pp.284~290 (2006)[DOI]
  13. 서경원, "The Efficacy of the EORTC Scoring System and Risk Tables for the Prediction of Recurrence and Progression of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer after Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Instillation", Investigative and Clinical Urology, 51(3), pp.165~170 (2010), 대한비뇨의학회
  14. Millan-Rodriguez F, "Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors of primary superficial bladder cancer", J Urol, 163(1), pp.73~78 (2000)[DOI]
  15. "Number of persons by race and Hispanic ethnicity for SEER participants (2010 census data 1)"[URL]
  16. National Cancer Institute, "SEER program coding and staging manual 2016" (2016)
  17. "Site recode ICD-O-3 (1/27/2003) definition"[URL]
  18. "AJCC cancer staging"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

Previous Bladder Cancer History in Patients with High-Risk, Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Correlates with Recurrence and Progression: Implications of Natural HistoryAnastasios D. Karatzas, Athanasios G. Papavassiliou, Erasmia C. Rouka, Gerasimos P. Vandoros, Ioannis V. Zachos, Konstantinos I. Dimitropoulos, Lampros P. Mitrakas, Michael D. Melekos, Stavros A. Gravas, Vassileios P. Tzortzis대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2015 · 제47권 제3호Clinical Prognostic Factors for Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer장성구, 전성현, 전승현대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2005 · 제37권 제1호Conditional Survival and Associated Prognostic Factors in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Retrospective Study at a Single Institution곽철, 강민용, 구자현, 김현회, 김형석, 정창욱대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2016 · 제48권 제2호The Prognosis and the Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Bladder Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery김좌훈, 김형돈, 박계진, 윤신교, 이용준, 이재련, 정혜현, 홍범식대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2022 · 제54권 제1호Current Trends in the Incidence and Survival Rate of Urological Cancers in Korea김성한, 박원서, 서호경, 오창모, 원영주, 이강현, 임지원, 정규원, 정재영, 정진수, 조현순대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2017 · 제49권 제3호The Characteristics of Recurrent Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy without Bladder Cuff Excision곽철, 강민용, 구자현, 김현회, 정창욱연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2015 · 제56권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)