본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

협동학습 기반 다시쓰기 활동이 대학생들의 쓰기와 말하기에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Cooperative Learning-Based Rewriting on College Students’ Writing and Speaking

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of cooperative learning-based rewriting on college students’ writing and speaking skills. For this study, students carried out two types of rewriting activities over 16 weeks. The experimental group (N=25), implemented with cooperative learning, rewrote summaries and dialogues after reading, while the control group (N=17) rewrote summaries and dialogues by themselves. The methods employed for data collection were pre- and post-writing samples, dialogues, summaries, and speaking tests. Both groups’ writing and speaking skills improved significantly over the instructional period. However, the experimental group outperformed the control group both in summary/dialogue writing and speaking. The findings of this study suggest that instructors find ways for low-proficiency students to improve productive skills as well as receptive skills in reading classes. A variety of rewriting activities are suggested to help these students become well-rounded communicators. It is also shown that the effect of cooperative learning can be maximized when students are given opportunities to carry out tasks related to their own interests and proficiency levels.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of cooperative learning-based rewriting on college students’ writing and speaking skills. For this study, students carried out two types of rewriting activities over 16 weeks. The experimental group (N=25), implemented with cooperative learning, rewrote summaries and dialogues after reading, while the control group (N=17) rewrote summaries and dialogues by themselves. The methods employed for data collection were pre- and post-writing samples, dialogues, summaries, and speaking tests. Both groups’ writing and speaking skills improved significantly over the instructional period. However, the experimental group outperformed the control group both in summary/dialogue writing and speaking. The findings of this study suggest that instructors find ways for low-proficiency students to improve productive skills as well as receptive skills in reading classes. A variety of rewriting activities are suggested to help these students become well-rounded communicators. It is also shown that the effect of cooperative learning can be maximized when students are given opportunities to carry out tasks related to their own interests and proficiency levels.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 고미숙, "OPIc(Oral Proficiency Interview-computer)자료를 활용한 영어말하기 숙련도 향상에 관한 연구 - 이야기 내용 구성요인을 중심으로 -", 교과교육학연구, 14(1), pp.21~45 (2010), 교과교육연구소[DOI]
  2. 교육인적자원부, "외국어 계열 전문 교과 교육과정" (2007), 교육인적자원부
  3. 김남미, "대학생을 위한 피드백 활용 다시쓰기 수업의 효과", 리터러시 연구, 9(1), pp.41~70 (2018), 한국 리터러시 학회[DOI]
  4. 김민지, "영어인터뷰 동영상 활용 수업이 영어말하기 능력과 정의적 태도에 미치는 영향 : 대학생 학습자를 중심으로", 석사, 영어교육전공, pp.2013
  5. 김지은, "영어쓰기 교육론: 원리와 적용", pp.225~256 (2009), 한국문화사
  6. 박분주, "EFL Learners’Rewriting Strategy in English Composition", 영어교육연구, 21(3), pp.147~164 (2009), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
  7. 방은주, "영자신문을 활용한 다시쓰기(Rewriting)활동이 초등학생의 영어쓰기능력에 미치는 영향", 석사, 어린이영어교육전공, pp.2012
  8. 배두본, "초등학교 영어 교육: 이론과 적용" (2002), 한국문화사
  9. 윤경옥, "쓰기 장르가 EFL 학습자들의 영어 쓰기 수행에 미치는 영향", 영어교과교육, 13(2), pp.133~152 (2014), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  10. 이완기, "영어 평가 방법론" (2007), 문진미디어
  11. 정문성, "협동학습의 이해와 실천" (2007), 교육과학사
  12. 최연희, "영어 쓰기 교육론: 원리와 적용", pp.103~193 (2009), 한국문화사
  13. Byrne, D., "Teaching writing skills" (1988)
  14. Celce-Murcia, M., "Discourse and context in language teaching: A guide for language teachers" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  15. Dobson, J. M., "The art of TESOL: Selected articles from the English teaching forum, part one", pp.53~63 (1975), Tower Press
  16. Epstein, R., "Tools and tips for using ELT materials: A guide for teachers" (2007), University of Michigan Press
  17. Harmer, J., "The practice of English language teaching" (2007), Longman
  18. Harris, J., "Rewriting: How to do things with texts" (2006), Utah State University Press
  19. Hyland, K., "Teaching and researching writing" (2002), Longman, Pearson Education
  20. "Summarization, notetaking, and mapping techniques: Lessons for L2 reading instruction" (1994)[URL]
  21. Kern, R., "Literacy and language teaching" (2000), Oxford University Press
  22. Kim, K. S., "The process and product of Korean college students’ English summary writing according to proficiency level, text difficulty, and text structure", Doctoral, pp.2012
  23. Nunan, D., "Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers" (1991), Prentice Hall Regents
  24. Newfields, T., "Teaching summarizing skills: Some practical hints", ELT journal, 2(2), pp.1~8 (2001)
  25. Slavin, R. E., "Cooperative learning" (1995), A Simon and Schuster
  26. Tribble, C., "Language teaching: Writing" (2003), Oxford University
  27. Yu, G., "Students’ voices in the evaluation of their written summaries: Empowerment and democracy for test takers?", Language Testing, 24(4), pp.539~572 (2007)
  28. Weir, C., "Understanding & developing language tests" (1993), Prentice-Hall

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)