본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국한문학 연구의 몇 가지 쟁점

Several Issues in Sino-Korean Literature Studies

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This thesis revealed the core assertions and characteristics of the researchers along with the contents of the original texts on the three controversial issues in Sino-korean literary researches which had recently been presented. First, I studied about the poetic implication of ‘The secrets of nature’, a key issue in the literary theory. Kim Hye-sook and Lee Dong-whan explained the meaning of 'The temper性情' and 'The secrets of nature' which Nongam had said in 「Jabji雜識」, Lee Sung-soo and Lee Dong-whan defined the meaning of ‘The secrets of nature’ and ‘The law of nature天理’ which Samyeon had said in 「Ilrok日錄」. Second, I compared four theses which had analyzed 「Yachoolgobookgoogi夜出古北口記」 written by Yeonam. Lee Dong-whan and Kim Do-ryun analyzed this essay focused on 'the aspect of thought' and 'the artistic quality', Lee Sung-soo and Jung Kil-soo analyzed the essay focused on 'the structure and aesthetic senses' of it and 'the criticism by predecessors and the adaptation process'. Third, I compared three theses which had analyzed 「Dablimhyungoronyuendosu答任亨五論原道書」 known as Yeonam's later essay. Lim Hyung-taek explained the characteristics of Yeunam's ideas, mainly about the terms in the essay, with the point of view of dialectics. Park Hee-byung explained Yeonam's practical utterances for the society and reflections for person's inner life. Shin Hyang-lim proved that Yeonam's ideas had been affected by the doctrines of Wang Yang-Min. Like the above, in the core of the critical issues on the results of the Sino-Korean literary researches, there's philosophy problems related with literature. First of all, the notion of ‘The secrets of nature’ in ‘The discussion of the secrets of nature天機論’, which has placed in the center of the literary theory in the later period of Joseon Dynasty, was related with the core contents of the history of ideas in the period, such as 'Yinsimdosimsul人心道心說' and 'Yinmoolsungdongyiron人物性同異論'. ‘The secrets of nature’ which Nongam had said in 「Jabji」was used as the core notion in the literary theory, and 'The secrets of nature' Samyeon had said in 「日錄」 was used as the core concept in 'Yinsimdosimsul' and 'Yinmoolsungdongyiron'. In addition to it, the implication of ‘The temper’ in ‘The discussion of the temper性情論’ in literary theory was not unrelated with the implication of 'The temper’, the core concept of The Neo -Confucianism性理學. Also, in the background that the four theses which had analyzed 「Yachoolgobookgoogi」 reached the different conclusions, there's the difference of the analysis for Yeonam's ideas in it. Finally, the analysis about the epistemology and aesthetic senses for Yeon's work could be altered according to what his ideological base was. This study will be able to find the meaning at the point of confirming the fundamental learning principle that the understanding of the primary meaning of the original text is more important than anything else in Sino-Korean literary researches.

Abstract

This thesis revealed the core assertions and characteristics of the researchers along with the contents of the original texts on the three controversial issues in Sino-korean literary researches which had recently been presented. First, I studied about the poetic implication of ‘The secrets of nature’, a key issue in the literary theory. Kim Hye-sook and Lee Dong-whan explained the meaning of 'The temper性情' and 'The secrets of nature' which Nongam had said in 「Jabji雜識」, Lee Sung-soo and Lee Dong-whan defined the meaning of ‘The secrets of nature’ and ‘The law of nature天理’ which Samyeon had said in 「Ilrok日錄」. Second, I compared four theses which had analyzed 「Yachoolgobookgoogi夜出古北口記」 written by Yeonam. Lee Dong-whan and Kim Do-ryun analyzed this essay focused on 'the aspect of thought' and 'the artistic quality', Lee Sung-soo and Jung Kil-soo analyzed the essay focused on 'the structure and aesthetic senses' of it and 'the criticism by predecessors and the adaptation process'. Third, I compared three theses which had analyzed 「Dablimhyungoronyuendosu答任亨五論原道書」 known as Yeonam's later essay. Lim Hyung-taek explained the characteristics of Yeunam's ideas, mainly about the terms in the essay, with the point of view of dialectics. Park Hee-byung explained Yeonam's practical utterances for the society and reflections for person's inner life. Shin Hyang-lim proved that Yeonam's ideas had been affected by the doctrines of Wang Yang-Min. Like the above, in the core of the critical issues on the results of the Sino-Korean literary researches, there's philosophy problems related with literature. First of all, the notion of ‘The secrets of nature’ in ‘The discussion of the secrets of nature天機論’, which has placed in the center of the literary theory in the later period of Joseon Dynasty, was related with the core contents of the history of ideas in the period, such as 'Yinsimdosimsul人心道心說' and 'Yinmoolsungdongyiron人物性同異論'. ‘The secrets of nature’ which Nongam had said in 「Jabji」was used as the core notion in the literary theory, and 'The secrets of nature' Samyeon had said in 「日錄」 was used as the core concept in 'Yinsimdosimsul' and 'Yinmoolsungdongyiron'. In addition to it, the implication of ‘The temper’ in ‘The discussion of the temper性情論’ in literary theory was not unrelated with the implication of 'The temper’, the core concept of The Neo -Confucianism性理學. Also, in the background that the four theses which had analyzed 「Yachoolgobookgoogi」 reached the different conclusions, there's the difference of the analysis for Yeonam's ideas in it. Finally, the analysis about the epistemology and aesthetic senses for Yeon's work could be altered according to what his ideological base was. This study will be able to find the meaning at the point of confirming the fundamental learning principle that the understanding of the primary meaning of the original text is more important than anything else in Sino-Korean literary researches.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 金昌協, "農巖集", 한국고전번역원
  2. 金昌翕, "三淵集", 한국고전번역원
  3. 朴趾源, "燕巖集", 한국고전번역원
  4. 朴趾源, "煙湘閣集", 연암 후손가, ~
  5. 李珥, "栗谷全書", 한국고전번역원
  6. 朱熹, "大學·中庸", 二以會
  7. 朱熹, "朱子語類", 商務印書館
  8. 김도련, "「夜出古北口記」의 함축미와 意境", 중국학논총, 10 (1994), 국민대학교 중국인문사회연구소
  9. 김명호, "연암 문학사상의 성격-주자사상과 관련하여-", 한국한문학연구, 17 (1995), 한국한문학회
  10. 김혜숙, "한국한시론에 있어서 천기에 대한 고찰(2)", 한국한시연구, 3 (1995), 한국한시학회
  11. 박희병, "한국의 생태사상" (1999), 돌베개
  12. 신향림, "燕巖 朴趾源의 만년 思想에 대한 再論 -맹인 설화와 「答任亨五論原道書」를 중심으로-", 한국한문학연구, (46), pp.353~386 (2010), 한국한문학회
  13. 심경호, "한문산문 연구에 관한 몇 가지 제안", 동방한문학, (31), pp.7~34 (2006), 동방한문학회
  14. 이동환, "「夜出古北口記」에 있어서의 燕巖의 自我", 한국한문학연구, 8 (1985), 한국한문학회
  15. 이동환, "조선후기 천기론의 개념 및 미학이념과 그 문예·사상적 연관", 한국한문학연구, 88 (2001), 한국한문학회
  16. 이승수, "17세기말 천기론의 형성과 전개", 한국한문학연구, 18 (1995), 한국한문학회
  17. 이승수, "夜出古北口記의 산문미 재론", 한국한문학연구, (38), pp.333~364 (2006), 한국한문학회
  18. 임형택, "박연암의 인식론과 미의식", 한국한문학연구, 11 (1988), 한국한문학회
  19. 정길수, "「夜出古北口記」의 비평적 접근", 대동문화연구, (64), pp.313~336 (2008), 대동문화연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)