Effect of nanoclay and nano rice bran powder in clay soil
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research article intends to put forward the analysis report on effect of using Nano clay and Nano Rice Bran powder inclay soil. The virgin (or) parent soil is tested for knowing their assets and then based on the optimum moisture content about0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1%, 1.2%. of Nano Clay and Nano Rice Bran powder added. First all the required engineeringproperty of the clay soil is determined followed by them Atterbergs limit, Standard proctor compaction test, CaliforniaBearing Ratio test for soil with different additives were determined. The significant improvement while using nano additiveswere noted. The Liquid Limit of virgin soil is 44% and while adding Nano Clay and Nano Rice Bran powder 0.2% on eachtrial the Liquid Limit decreases to 37% and 39%. Likewise the plastic limit, shrinkage limit also decreases on increasingadditive content. Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) decreases on Nano material addition. For Nano Rice Bran and NanoClay the optimum value for OMC is 0.6% and 0.8%. The CBR value is determined for analysing the sugrade strength. Maximum value obtained at 1% of Nano Clay and Nano Rice Bran powder addition. On evaluating the overall outcomes, itis clearly known 1% of Nanomaterial is enough for achieving good stabilized soil.
Abstract
This research article intends to put forward the analysis report on effect of using Nano clay and Nano Rice Bran powder inclay soil. The virgin (or) parent soil is tested for knowing their assets and then based on the optimum moisture content about0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1%, 1.2%. of Nano Clay and Nano Rice Bran powder added. First all the required engineeringproperty of the clay soil is determined followed by them Atterbergs limit, Standard proctor compaction test, CaliforniaBearing Ratio test for soil with different additives were determined. The significant improvement while using nano additiveswere noted. The Liquid Limit of virgin soil is 44% and while adding Nano Clay and Nano Rice Bran powder 0.2% on eachtrial the Liquid Limit decreases to 37% and 39%. Likewise the plastic limit, shrinkage limit also decreases on increasingadditive content. Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) decreases on Nano material addition. For Nano Rice Bran and NanoClay the optimum value for OMC is 0.6% and 0.8%. The CBR value is determined for analysing the sugrade strength. Maximum value obtained at 1% of Nano Clay and Nano Rice Bran powder addition. On evaluating the overall outcomes, itis clearly known 1% of Nanomaterial is enough for achieving good stabilized soil.
참고문헌 (46)
- Y. Liu, , Adv. Civ. Eng (2019)
- F.E. Jalal, , Adv. Mater. Sci. & Eng (2020)
- V. Subramani, , Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Tech, 4, pp.641~645 (2016)
- A. J. Choobbasti, , Const. & Bldg. Mat, 211, pp.1094~1104 (2019)
- R. Zhang, , Adv. Civ. Eng (2019)
- Y. Liu, , Const. Build. Mats, 221, pp.1~11 (2019)
- K. C. Onyelowe, , Int. J. Low-C. Tech, 14(3), pp.410~416 (2019)
- J. Rosales, , Mats, 13(14), pp.3058~ (2020)
- P. M. Zhan, , J. Bldg. Environ, 30, pp.101~259 (2020)
- A. K. Sabat, , Int. J. Civ. Struct. Eng, 1(4), pp.939~948 (2011)
- Aneis Maasyirah Hamzah, "Physical, morphological and mineralogical properties of ceramic brick incorporated with Malaysia’s Rice Hush Ash (RHA) agricultural waste", Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 22(2), pp.200~207 (2021), 청정에너지연구소[DOI]
- S. N. Bhavsar, , Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Dev, 2(2), pp.2321~0613 (2014)
- K. C. Onyelowe, , Int. J. Low-Carbon. Tech, 14(3), pp.410~416 (2019)
- Z. J. Taher, , Trans. Geotech, 24, pp.100387~ (2020)
- J. Krishnan, , Arab. J. Geosci, 12(14), pp.1~25 (2019)
- J. Khazaei, , Arab. J. Sci. & Eng, 44(10), pp.8337~8346 (2019)
- R. K. Etim, , Innov. Infra. Sol, 7(1), pp.1~17 (2022)
- C. C. Ikeagwuani, , J. Rock Mech. &Geotech. Eng, 11(2), pp.423~440 (2019)
- S. Andavan, , Mat. Tod. : Proc, 22, pp.1200~1202 (2020)
- A. K. Yadav, , Int. J. Pvmt. Res. & Tech, 10(3), pp.254~261 (2017)
- E. Adeyanju, , Case Stud. Const. Mat, 13, pp.e00388~ (2020)
- Jieguang Song, "Influence of raw materials ratio on performance of permeable bricks made from electric porcelain waste", Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 23(4), pp.409~414 (2022), 청정에너지연구소[DOI]
- P. Kulanthaivel, , Mat. Today. : Proc, 45, pp.507~511 (2021)
- Yootaek Kim, "Effects of manufacturing conditions on physical properties of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) slag geopolymer", Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 18(3), pp.214~219 (2017), 청정에너지연구소[DOI]
- A. Kalhor, , Cold Reg. Sci. & Tech, 161, pp.129~136 (2019)
- F. Changizi, , Road Mat. & Pvmt. Des, pp.1~18 (2021)
- S. S. Shahin, , Seventh Int. Conf. on Nano Tech. Const, 1(1), pp.1~5 (2015)
- P. P. Kulkarni, , Int. J. Geosyn. & Grnd. Eng, 8(1), pp.1~17 (2022)
- J. E. Sani, , J. King Saud Univ. -Eng. Sci, 32(1), pp.11~18 (2020)
- T. R. Pilladi, , Powder Tech, 246, pp.247~251 (2013)
- A. H. AlSaeedi, , J. King Saud Univ. -Eng. Sci, pp.101926~ (2022)
- A. Al-Omari, , J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci, pp.1~6 (2021)
- M. Khodaparast, , Const. & Bldg. Mat, 281, pp.122548~ (2021)
- R. Gobinath, , Mat. Today : Proc, 27, pp.657~663 (2020)
- E. U. Eyo, , J. Rock Mech. &Geotech. Eng, 12(5), pp.1056~1069 (2020)
- A. Siddika, , J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci, 33(5), pp.294~307 (2021)
- F. Alharbi, , Sustain, 13(3), pp.1443~ (2021)
- F. Bergaya, , Hdbk. clay Sci. Newnes (2013)
- N. AlMasoud, , Anal. Methodol, 12(41), pp.4949~4955 (2020)
- A. Johari, , Iran Bldg. Eng. Geo. & Environ, 80(9), pp.6725~6748 (2021)
- A. Kausar, , Clay Nanopar, pp.169~184 (2020)
- S. Bhosale, , Curr. Res. Nutr. & Food Sci. J, 3(1), pp.74~80 (2015)
- A. E. AL-Salami, , Const. Bldg. Mat, 47, pp.138~145 (2013)
- T. Christian John, , Ency. Phy. Sci. & Tech, pp.63~76 (2003)
- A. AlObaid, , J. King Saud Univ. Sci, 34(1), pp.101716~ (2022)
- A.M. Rashad, , Mat. & Des, 52, pp.143~157 (2013)