Orthodontic and orthopedic treatment for a growing patient with Tessier number 0 cleft
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this case report was to introduce the concept of orthodontic and orthopedic treatment for a growing patient with Tessier number 0 cleft. A 5-year-old boy patient with Tessier number 0 cleft presented congenitally missing maxillary central incisors (MXCI), a bony defect at the premaxilla, a constricted maxillary arch, an anterior openbite, and maxillary hypoplasia. His treatment was divided into three stages: management of the bony defect at the premaxilla and the congenitally missing MXCIs using a fan-type expansion plate, iliac bone grafting, and eruption guidance of the maxillary lateral incisors into the graft area for substitution of MXCIs; management of the maxillary hypoplasia using sequential facemask therapy with conventional and skeletal anchorage; and management of the remaining occlusal problems using fixed orthodontic treatment. The total treatment duration was 15 years and 10 months. Class I canine and Class II molar relationships and normal overbite and overjet were achieved at the end of treatment. Although the long-term use of facemask therapy resulted in significant protraction of the retrusive maxilla, the patient exhibited Class III profile because of continued mandibular growth. However, the treatment result was well maintained after 2 years of retention. The findings from this case suggest that interdisciplinary and customized approaches are mandatory for successful management of maxillary hypoplasia, bony defect, and dental problems in Tessier number 0 cleft. Moreover, considering the potential of orthognathic surgery or distraction osteogenesis, meticulous monitoring of mandibular growth until growth completion is important.
Abstract
The purpose of this case report was to introduce the concept of orthodontic and orthopedic treatment for a growing patient with Tessier number 0 cleft. A 5-year-old boy patient with Tessier number 0 cleft presented congenitally missing maxillary central incisors (MXCI), a bony defect at the premaxilla, a constricted maxillary arch, an anterior openbite, and maxillary hypoplasia. His treatment was divided into three stages: management of the bony defect at the premaxilla and the congenitally missing MXCIs using a fan-type expansion plate, iliac bone grafting, and eruption guidance of the maxillary lateral incisors into the graft area for substitution of MXCIs; management of the maxillary hypoplasia using sequential facemask therapy with conventional and skeletal anchorage; and management of the remaining occlusal problems using fixed orthodontic treatment. The total treatment duration was 15 years and 10 months. Class I canine and Class II molar relationships and normal overbite and overjet were achieved at the end of treatment. Although the long-term use of facemask therapy resulted in significant protraction of the retrusive maxilla, the patient exhibited Class III profile because of continued mandibular growth. However, the treatment result was well maintained after 2 years of retention. The findings from this case suggest that interdisciplinary and customized approaches are mandatory for successful management of maxillary hypoplasia, bony defect, and dental problems in Tessier number 0 cleft. Moreover, considering the potential of orthognathic surgery or distraction osteogenesis, meticulous monitoring of mandibular growth until growth completion is important.
참고문헌 (14)
- Kawamoto HK, "Plastic surgery", pp.389~550 (1990), WB Saunders
- Tessier P, "Anatomical classification facial, craniofacial and latero-facial clefts", J Maxillofac Surg, 4, pp.69~92 (1976)[DOI]
- da Silva Freitas R, "Surgical correction of Tessier number 0 cleft", J Craniofac Surg, 19, pp.1348~1352 (2008)[DOI]
- Guruprasad Y, "Midline nasal dermoid cyst with Tessier's 0 cleft", J Nat Sci Biol Med, 5, pp.479~482 (2014)[DOI]
- Council of the University Faculties of Orthodontics in Korea, "Textbook of orthodontics" (2014), Jeesung Pub. Co.
- Delaire J, "Maxillary development revisited: relevance to the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusions", Eur J Orthod, 19, pp.289~311 (1997)[DOI]
- Baek SH, "New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.783~791 (2010)[DOI]
- Ahn HW, "Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.935~941 (2012)[DOI]
- Seo YJ, "Initial growth pattern of children with cleft before alveolar bone graft stage according to cleft type", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.1103~1110 (2011)[DOI]
- Enemark H, "Long-term results after secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 45, pp.913~919 (1987)[DOI]
- De Riu G, "Secondary bone grafting of alveolar cleft", Minerva Stomatol, 53, pp.571~579 (2004)
- Schultze-Mosgau S, "Analysis of bone resorption after secondary alveolar cleft bone grafts before and after canine eruption in connection with orthodontic gap closure or prosthodontic treatment", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 61, pp.1245~1248 (2003)[DOI]
- Susami T, "Maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate in mixed dentition: cephalometric evaluation after completion of growth", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 51, pp.514~524 (2014)[DOI]
- Seo J, "Effect of secondary alveolar bone grafting on the maxillary growth: unilateral versus bilateral cleft lip and palate patients", J Craniofac Surg, 26, pp.2128~2132 (2015)[DOI]