인공신경망을 이용한 조산 단태아의 분만 임신주수 예측
Prediction of Gestational Age at Birth using an Artificial Neural Networks in Singleton Preterm Birth
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The objective of the present study was to predict the gestational age at preterm birth using artificial neural networks for singleton pregnancy. Methods: Artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used as a tool for the prediction of gestational age at birth. ANNs trained using obstetrical data of 125 cases, including 56 preterm and 69 non-preterm deliveries. Using a 36-variable obstetrical input set, gestational weeks at delivery were predicted by 89 cases of training sets, 18 cases of validating sets, and 18 cases of testing sets (total: 125 cases). After training, we validated the model by another 12 cases containing data of preterm deliveries. Results: To define the accuracy of the developed model, we confirmed the correlation coefficient (R) and mean square error of the model. For validating sets, the correlation coefficient was 0.839, but R of testing sets was 0.892, and R of total 125 cases was 0.959. The neural networks were well trained, and the model predictions were relatively good. Furthermore, the model was validated with another dataset of 12 cases, and the correlation coefficient was 0.709. The error days were 11.58±13.73. Conclusion: In the present study, we trained the ANNs and developed the predictive model for gestational age at delivery. Although the prediction for gestational age at birth in singleton preterm birth was feasible, further studies with larger data, including detailed risk variables of preterm birth and other obstetrical outcomes, are needed.
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of the present study was to predict the gestational age at preterm birth using artificial neural networks for singleton pregnancy. Methods: Artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used as a tool for the prediction of gestational age at birth. ANNs trained using obstetrical data of 125 cases, including 56 preterm and 69 non-preterm deliveries. Using a 36-variable obstetrical input set, gestational weeks at delivery were predicted by 89 cases of training sets, 18 cases of validating sets, and 18 cases of testing sets (total: 125 cases). After training, we validated the model by another 12 cases containing data of preterm deliveries. Results: To define the accuracy of the developed model, we confirmed the correlation coefficient (R) and mean square error of the model. For validating sets, the correlation coefficient was 0.839, but R of testing sets was 0.892, and R of total 125 cases was 0.959. The neural networks were well trained, and the model predictions were relatively good. Furthermore, the model was validated with another dataset of 12 cases, and the correlation coefficient was 0.709. The error days were 11.58±13.73. Conclusion: In the present study, we trained the ANNs and developed the predictive model for gestational age at delivery. Although the prediction for gestational age at birth in singleton preterm birth was feasible, further studies with larger data, including detailed risk variables of preterm birth and other obstetrical outcomes, are needed.
참고문헌 (25)
- Andersen HF, "Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 163(3), pp.859~867 (1990)
- Beck S, "The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity", Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, pp.31~38 (2010)
- Behrman RE, "Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention", pp.255~258 (2007), The National Academies press
- Berkowitz GS, "Epidemiology of preterm birth", Epidemiologic Reviews, 15, pp.414~443 (1993)
- Bruijn MM, "The predictive value of quantitative fibronectin testing in combination with cervical length measurement in symptomatic women", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 215, pp.791~798 (2016)
- Cassell GH, "Ureaplasma urealyticum intrauterine infection: role in prematurity and disease in newborns", Clin Microbiol Rev, 6(1), pp.69~87 (1993)
- Catley C, "Predicting highrisk preterm birth using artificial neural networks", IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed, 10(3), pp.540~549 (2006)
- Cnattingius S, "Maternal Obesity and Risk of Preterm Delivery", JAMA, 309(22), pp.2362~2370 (2013)
- Dilek TUK, "Progressive Cervical Length Changes versus Single Cervical Length Measurement by Transvaginal ultrasound for Prediction of Preterm Delivery", Gynecol Obstet Invest, 64, pp.175~179 (2007)
- Goldenberg RL, "Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery", N Engl J Med, 342, pp.1500~1507 (2000)
- Iams JD, "Frequency of Uterine Contractions and the Risk of Spontaneous Preterm Delivery", N Engl J Med, 346, pp.250~255 (2002)
- Kho BW, "The Implemetation of Artificial Neural Network Model for improving the Diagnosis Accuracy of Type 2 Diabetes", Proceed Symposium Korean Inst communic Inform Sci, 1, pp.849~850 (2018)
- Kim SW, "A timedependent surrogate model for storm surge prediction based on an artificial neural network using high-fidelity synthetic hurricane modeling", Nat Hazards, 76, pp.565~585 (2015)
- Lee KA, "A model for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic women", J Womens Health, 20, pp.1825~1831 (2011)
- 임광현, "ST 분절 급상승 심근경색 환자들의 단기 재발 사망 예측", 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 17(10), pp.145~154 (2012), 한국컴퓨터정보학회
- Liong S, "Prediction of spontaneous preterm labour in at-risk pregnant women", Reproduction, 146, pp.335~345 (2013)
- Lisboa PJG, "A review of evidence of health benefit from artificial neural networks in medical intervention", Neural Netw, 15, pp.11~39 (2002)
- Lockwood CJ, "Risk stratification and pathological mechanism in preterm delivery", Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 15(2), pp.78~89 (2001)
- Morken NH, "Risk of spontaneous preterm delivery in a low-risk population: the impact of maternal febrile episodes, urinary tract infection, pneumonia and ear-nose-throat infections", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 159, pp.310~314 (2011)
- Morken NH, "Predicting risk of spontaneous preterm delivery in women with a singleton pregnancy", Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 28(1), pp.11~22 (2014)
- Schmidhuber J, "Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An overview", Neural Netw, 61, pp.85~117 (2015)
- Statistics Korea, "Final results of Birth statistics in 2016" (2016)
- Torchin H, "Epidemiology and risk factors of preterm birth", J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 45(10), pp.1213~1230 (2016)
- Vinken M, "Accuracy of Frequency-Related Parameters of the Electrohysterogram for Predicting Preterm Delivery: A Review of the literature", Obstet Gynecol Surv, 64(8), pp.529~541 (2009)
- Zhu Y, "New model for predicting preterm delivery during the second trimester of pregnancy", Scientific Reports, 7, pp.11294~ (2017)