일본독일미국의 산재보험 간병급여체계의 비교
Comparison of the Personal Care Benefit System under Workers' Compensation in Japan, Germany, and the United States
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: A national long-term care system for elderly and the disabled has its unique evolution in each country. Japan, Germany and the United States may be the typical examples of respective social insurance system. This paper reviews the counterpart examples of Japan, Germany and the United States and looks at their accumulated long-term care system experiences and personal care system under workers' compensation. Methods: Literature review and website searching were conducted. Key words as ‘workers' compensation insurance’, ‘personal care benefit’ and ‘long term care’ were used in searching the related literatures. Results: Though the personal care benefit under current Workers’Compensation in Korea is very similar to Japan’s, the long-term care system of Korea is not as well established. Germany and the United States have the provision of personal care benefit for injured workers within long term care system. Conclusions: We recommend some key issues to take into account for improving personal care benefit system in workers’ compensation in Korea as follows: providing a comprehensive coverage through the linkage of long term care, introducing an assessment & evaluation system for the appropriate benefits, establishing insurer’s role for quality management of personal care service, and developing a policy for family caregivers.
Abstract
Purpose: A national long-term care system for elderly and the disabled has its unique evolution in each country. Japan, Germany and the United States may be the typical examples of respective social insurance system. This paper reviews the counterpart examples of Japan, Germany and the United States and looks at their accumulated long-term care system experiences and personal care system under workers' compensation. Methods: Literature review and website searching were conducted. Key words as ‘workers' compensation insurance’, ‘personal care benefit’ and ‘long term care’ were used in searching the related literatures. Results: Though the personal care benefit under current Workers’Compensation in Korea is very similar to Japan’s, the long-term care system of Korea is not as well established. Germany and the United States have the provision of personal care benefit for injured workers within long term care system. Conclusions: We recommend some key issues to take into account for improving personal care benefit system in workers’ compensation in Korea as follows: providing a comprehensive coverage through the linkage of long term care, introducing an assessment & evaluation system for the appropriate benefits, establishing insurer’s role for quality management of personal care service, and developing a policy for family caregivers.
참고문헌 (23)
- 근로복지공단, "일본노재중도피재노동자의 간병과 원호" (1999), 근로복지공단
- 근로복지공단, "독일 산재보험법 해설서" (2005), 근로복지공단
- 김근홍, "독일 노인수발사 제도의 한국적 시사", 한국노년학, 22(2), pp.19~39 (2002), 한국노년학회
- 노동부, "2005년도 산재보험사업연보" (2006), 노동부
- 문성현, "인구고령화가 산재보험제도에 미치는 영향분석", 21(4), pp.117~135 (2005)
- 박찬임, "주요국의 산재보험 재활사업체계 연구" (2005), 한국노동연구원
- 보건복지부, "노인장기요양법: 대안" (2007), 보건복지부
- 신수식, "산재보험급여체계의 합리적 개선방안에 관한 연구" (2005), 노동부
- 이현주, "주요국의 산재보험 급여체계 비교연구" (2003), 한국노동연구원
- 전경자, "간병급여 지급기준 등에 관한 연구" (2006), 노동부
- 최은영, "OECD 국가의 노인장기요양서비스 체계 비교와 정책적 함의" (2005), 한국보건사회연구원
- "療養（補償）給付の請求手" (2006)
- "California Labor Code Section 4604.5." (2006)
- Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenos- senschaften(HVBG) (Hrsg.), "BG- Statistiken fuer die Praxis" (2002), Sankt Augustin
- "The Hawaii Workers' Compensation Law. Sections 386-23 and 386-23.5" (2006)
- Kittner, M. (Hrsg.), "Arbeits- und Sozialordnung" (2002), 27 Auflage. Frankfurt a. M.
- "Ohio Bureau of workers’ compensation laws and rules: chapter 4121 & 4123" (2006)
- "Oregon administrative rules(OAR) 436-010- 0210(3) workers’compensation law home- health-care section" (2006)
- "Maryland workers’ compensation law" (2006)
- "Montana code aantated 2005. Section 39-71-1107. Domiciliary care-requirement- evaluation" (2006)
- "State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Workers’ compensation court rules of practice. section 28-33-41(e)(A)" (2006)
- "Washington state legislature. Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296-23-246. Attendant services", pp.296~ (2006)
- "Wyoming workers’ compensation rules and regulations and fee schedule Chapter9 section7.Home Health Nursing services" (2006)