수까르노와 이승만: 제 2차 세계 대전 후 건국 지도자 비교
Sukarno and Syngman Rhee: A Comparative Study of the National Leaders in the Process of Nation-Building after World War II
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research focuses on the background, formation and the state of the diplomatic route between Indonesia’s first president Sukarno and Korea’s first president Syngman Rhee. Sukarno and Syngman Rhee are the ones who led the countries after each independence was achieved in 1945. Under the colonization of outer force, both leaders had been trying to develop nationalism in order to achieve independence. When independence was achieved, they then focused on establishing policies and developing diplomatic relationships. In the process of establishing the country, they followed their own independent diplomatic route. The fact that both of the countries had been colonized has made them to have similar background and they were both leaders who had encountered the cold war system. Sukarno and Syngman Rhee are both outstanding diplomats and for the independence of their countries, they emphasized and make use of the diplomacy. Although the diplomatic policy and the countries which they were facing were different from each other, the background of their diplomatic policy which based on democracy, is the same. The diplomatic route of Sukarno and Syngman Rhee is based on political ideology, domestic and foreign elements. Sukarno’s diplomatic route is in the form of anti-imperialism, anti-west country, and non-alignment. On the other hand, Syngman Rhee’s diplomatic route is in the form of anti-imperialism, anti-communism, and pro-America. Sukarno’s diplomatic route which seems to be biased had resulted in the spreading of the Communist Party and the execution of NASAKOM (Nasional, Agama, Komunis), a policy which caused politic and economy development to be imbalance. As a result, Sukarno has to handover his political power to the military general. On the other hand, Syngman Rhee left the political stage after he was involved in rigged election and triggered the 4.19 revolution. Although there exist negative comments on the choice of their diplomatic route, Sukarno and Syngman Rhee’s diplomatic policy had nevertheless played a pivotal rule in setting a strong and solid base for the establishment of both countries. This research compares and analyses the diplomatic routes being implemented by the two leaders in the same time frame.
Abstract
This research focuses on the background, formation and the state of the diplomatic route between Indonesia’s first president Sukarno and Korea’s first president Syngman Rhee. Sukarno and Syngman Rhee are the ones who led the countries after each independence was achieved in 1945. Under the colonization of outer force, both leaders had been trying to develop nationalism in order to achieve independence. When independence was achieved, they then focused on establishing policies and developing diplomatic relationships. In the process of establishing the country, they followed their own independent diplomatic route. The fact that both of the countries had been colonized has made them to have similar background and they were both leaders who had encountered the cold war system. Sukarno and Syngman Rhee are both outstanding diplomats and for the independence of their countries, they emphasized and make use of the diplomacy. Although the diplomatic policy and the countries which they were facing were different from each other, the background of their diplomatic policy which based on democracy, is the same. The diplomatic route of Sukarno and Syngman Rhee is based on political ideology, domestic and foreign elements. Sukarno’s diplomatic route is in the form of anti-imperialism, anti-west country, and non-alignment. On the other hand, Syngman Rhee’s diplomatic route is in the form of anti-imperialism, anti-communism, and pro-America. Sukarno’s diplomatic route which seems to be biased had resulted in the spreading of the Communist Party and the execution of NASAKOM (Nasional, Agama, Komunis), a policy which caused politic and economy development to be imbalance. As a result, Sukarno has to handover his political power to the military general. On the other hand, Syngman Rhee left the political stage after he was involved in rigged election and triggered the 4.19 revolution. Although there exist negative comments on the choice of their diplomatic route, Sukarno and Syngman Rhee’s diplomatic policy had nevertheless played a pivotal rule in setting a strong and solid base for the establishment of both countries. This research compares and analyses the diplomatic routes being implemented by the two leaders in the same time frame.
참고문헌 (49)
- 고정휴, "이승만 대통령 재평가", pp.1~28 (2007), 연세대학교 출판부
- 고정휴, "독립운동기 이승만의 외교 노선과 제국주의", 역사비평, (31), pp.131~135 (1995), 역사문제연구소
- 고정휴, "개화기 이승만의 사상형성과 활동", 역사학보, 109, pp.42~50 (1986)
- 김한교, "이승만 대통령 재평가", pp.129~135 (2007), 연세대학교 출판부
- 방선주, "재미한인의 독립운동", pp.206~226 (1989), 한림대 아시아문화연구소
- 고정휴, "독립운동기 이승만의 외교 노선과제국주의", 역사비평, (31), pp.133~135, 역사문제연구소
- 양동안, "대한민국 건국사", pp.256~257 (1998), 건국대통령이승만박사기념사업회
- 유영익, "이승만의 삶과 꿈 - 대통령이 되기까지", 중앙일보사, 26~30 (1996)
- 유영익, "雩南 李承晩의 『獄中雜記』 白眉", 인문과학, 80, pp.15~69 (1999), 인문학연구원
- 유영익, "젊은 날의 이승만: 한성감옥생활(1899-1904)과 옥중잡기 연구", pp.1~251 (2002), 연세대학교 출판부
- 유영익, "이승만 연구 : 독립운동과 대한민국 건국", pp.414~451 (2003), 연세대학교 출판부
- 유영익, "이승만 대통령 재평가", pp.1~187 (1955), 연세대학교 출판부
- 유영익, "수정주의와 한국 현대사", pp.143~ (2010), 연세대학교출판부
- 이완범, "수정주의와 한국 현대사", pp.143~ (2010), 연세대학교 출판부
- 이정식, "이승만연구: 독립운동과 대한민국 건국", pp.414~435 (2003), 연세대학교 출판부
- 이주영, "이승만 시대(29)", 뉴데일리, ~ (2013)
- 이한우, "『거대한 생애 이승만 90년』(상)", 조선일보사, 255~ (1995)
- 전상인, "이승만 연구:독립운동과 대한민국 건국", pp.441~451 (2003), 연세대학교 출판부
- 차상철, "이승만 대통령재평가", pp.156~187 (2007), 연세대학교 출판부
- 차상철, "1950년대 한국사의 재조명", pp.346~354 (2004), 선인
- 최정호, "‘그네뛰기’와 ‘자리 굳히기’", 동아일보, ~ (2004)
- "동아일보", ~ (1946)
- Agoes, Frederika J.E, "(cet ke-2), Sukarno: Pemikiran Politik dan Kenyataan Praktek", pp.241~ (1993), RajaGrafindo Persada
- Alfian, "Pemikiran dan Perubahan Politik Indonesia" (1992), Gramedia
- Anderson, Benedict, "Language and Power: Esploring Political Culture in Indonesia", pp.94~120 (1990), Cornell University Press
- Arnold M. Ludwig, "King of the Mountain: The Nature of Political Leadership" (2004), University Press of Kentucky
- "002386; 1981, 367A. in Scott, Peter Dale, “The United States and the Overthrow of Sukarno, 1965-1967” Pacific Affairs" (1982)[URL]
- Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, "UUD 1945 P-4 GBHN: Tap-Tap MPR 1988", Dirjen P&K, 27~32 (1988)
- Feith, Herbert, "Indonesian Political Thinking 1945-1965" (1970), Cornell University Press
- Friend, Theodore, "The Blue-Eyed Enemy: Japan Against the West in Java and Luzon 1942-1945" (1988), Princeton University Press
- "President Sukarno and The Communists: The Politics of Domestication"[URL]
- "Indonesia’s Confrontation with Malaysia: A Search for Motives"[URL]
- Jackson, Karl D, "Political Power and Communications in Indonesia" (1978), University of California Press
- Latief, Abdul, "Pledoi Kol.A.Latief: Soeharto Terlibat G 30 S" (2000), Institut Studi Arus Informasi
- Leifer, Michael, "Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia, Jakarta:Gramedia. Liong, Liem Soei. “Indonesian Muslims and the State: accommodation or revolt?”", Third World Qurterly, 881~ (1986)
- Lubis, Mochtar, "Budaya, Masyarakat dan Manusia Indonesia" (1992), Yayasan Obor Indonesia
- Martowidjojo, Mangil, "Kesaksian tentang Bung Karno 1945-1967" (1999), Grasindo
- Miriam S. Budiardjo, "Evolution toward Parlimentary Government in Indonesia: Parties and Parliament", 석사, pp.1955
- Noer, Deliar, "Pengantar ke Pemikiran Politik", pp.104~ (1964), Dwipa
- "Political Leadership and Foreign Policy:Study of Sukarno’s Confrontation Policy against Malaysia"[URL]
- Pribadi, Toto, "Sukarno: Pemikiran Politik dan Kenyataan Praktek", pp.101~ (1993), RajaGrafindo Persada
- "Sejarah Indonesia Modern" (1992)[URL]
- "Sistem Politik Indonesia: Kestabilan, Peta Kekuatan Politik dan Pembangunan,(cet II), Jakarta: Penerbit CV Rajawali. Scott, Peter Dale, “The United States and the Overthrow of Sukarno,1965-1967”" (1982)[URL]
- Sjamsuddin, Nazaruddin, "Sukarno: Pemikiran Politik dan Kenyataan Praktek" (1993), RajaGrafindo Persada
- Smith, Roger, "Southeast Asia Documents of Political Development and Change" (1974)
- Subekti, Valina Singka, "Sukarno: Pemikiran Politik dan Kenyataan Praktek", pp.139~151 (1993), RajaGrafindo Persada
- "Sukarno, An Autobiography, Bobbs-Merrill" (1965)[URL]
- Syafiie, Inu Kencana, "Sistem Politik Indonesia" (2005), Refika Aditama
