코뮨주의에서 공동성과 특이성
The Concept of Singularity and Commun-ity in Commune-ism
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I examine the concept of community on the ontological level. The central theses of ontological theory on community, such as “inoperative community” (Nancy), “the coming community” (Agamben), and “the community of those who have nothing in common” (Lingis), can be summarized as follows: “It is where the community is not that the community is.” While these arguments emphasize ontological communality at the expense of communities in real life, I accentuate the dimension of the actual in the theorization of community. I argue that we can properly think of the virtual or ontological dimension of community only through trying to conjure up communities at the actual level. At the root of this conceptualization of community is the Spinozist thesis that the individual is formed through the process of individualization and that the individual is an assemblage of many “dividuals.” While we define commun-ity (the concept of community) as the process of individualization that unites multiple heterogeneous components, we define singularity as the process of bringing heterogeneous singular points together. In Deleuzean terms, the former becomes the “content” of community, whereas the latter take on its “expression.” The central thesis of this article is to examine the problem of the interiority and outsideness of community through these two concepts, i.e., “commun-ity” and “singularity.”
Abstract
In this paper, I examine the concept of community on the ontological level. The central theses of ontological theory on community, such as “inoperative community” (Nancy), “the coming community” (Agamben), and “the community of those who have nothing in common” (Lingis), can be summarized as follows: “It is where the community is not that the community is.” While these arguments emphasize ontological communality at the expense of communities in real life, I accentuate the dimension of the actual in the theorization of community. I argue that we can properly think of the virtual or ontological dimension of community only through trying to conjure up communities at the actual level. At the root of this conceptualization of community is the Spinozist thesis that the individual is formed through the process of individualization and that the individual is an assemblage of many “dividuals.” While we define commun-ity (the concept of community) as the process of individualization that unites multiple heterogeneous components, we define singularity as the process of bringing heterogeneous singular points together. In Deleuzean terms, the former becomes the “content” of community, whereas the latter take on its “expression.” The central thesis of this article is to examine the problem of the interiority and outsideness of community through these two concepts, i.e., “commun-ity” and “singularity.”
참고문헌 (27)
- 가라타니 고진, "탐구" (1998), 새물결
- 마르틴 하이데거, "존재와 시간" (1998), 까치
- 마르틴 하이데거, "형이상학의 근본개념" (2003), 까치
- 마르틴 하이데거, "이정표 2권", pp.123~182 (2005), 한길사
- 마르틴 하이데거, "강연과 논문", pp.211~242 (2008), 이학사
- 모리스 블랑쇼, "정치평론 1953~1993" (1993), 그린비
- 마주한 공동체, "밝힐 수 없는 공동체", pp.2005, 장 뤽 낭시
- 미셸 푸코, "말과 사물" (1986), 민음사
- 베니딕트 스피노자, "에티카" (1990), 서광사
- 알랭 바디우, "조건들" (2006), 새물결
- 유아사 마코토, "派遣村", pp.v~vii (2009), 岩波書店
- 이진경, "미-래의 맑스주의", pp.381~414 (2006), 그린비
- 이진경, "존재론적 코뮨주의와 코뮨주의적 존재론", 문화과학, (론적을) (2006)
- 이진경, "21세기 자본주의와 대안적 사회주의" (2007), 문화과학사
- 이진경, "코뮨주의 선언", pp.143~186 (2007), 교양인
- 이진경, "외부, 사유의 정치학" (2009), 그린비
- 임마누엘 칸트, "순수이성비판 2" (2006), 아카넷
- 마주한 공동체, "밝힐 수 없는 공동체", pp.2005, 장-뤽 낭시
- 질 들뢰즈, "차이와 반복" (2004), 민음사
- 질 들뢰즈, "들뢰즈가 만든 철학사", pp.509~517 (2007), 이학사
- 질 들뢰즈, "천의 고원 2권" (2000), 연구공간 수유+너머 자료실
- 클레이 서키, "끌리고 쏠리고 들끓다" (2008), 갤리온
- 타다 토미오, "면역의 의미론: 자기란 무엇인가?" (1998), 한울
- 토니 모리슨, "파라다이스" (2001), 들녘
- Esposito, Roberto., "近代政治の脫構築" (2009), 講談社
- Lingis, Alphonso., "何にも共有しないものたちの共同体" (2006), 洛北出版
- Nancy, Jean-Luc., "無爲の共同體" (2001), 以文社
