A Commitment to Democracy Does Not Entail an Open Borders Immigration Policy
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Arash Abizadeh, in his recent contribution, "Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders," made an argument for the provocative conclusion that states with a commitment to democracy must allow non-citizens a say in determining the immigration policies they enact. I show that Abizadeh's argument fails; he does not prove that a commitment to democracy entails an open borders immigration policy.
Abstract
Arash Abizadeh, in his recent contribution, "Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders," made an argument for the provocative conclusion that states with a commitment to democracy must allow non-citizens a say in determining the immigration policies they enact. I show that Abizadeh's argument fails; he does not prove that a commitment to democracy entails an open borders immigration policy.
참고문헌 (5)
- Abizadeh, Arash, "Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders", Political Theory, 36(1), pp.37~65 (2008)
- Benhabib, Seyla, "The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Blake, Michael, "Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30(3), pp.257~296 (2002)
- Habermas, Jürgen, "Inclusion of the Other" (1998), MIT Press
- Raz, Joseph, "National Self-Determination", The Journal of Philosophy, 87(9), pp.455~ (1990)