근세 한국과 일본의 역사 기록 비교
Comparative Study of Historical Records and Documents between Korea and Japan in the Pre-modern Period
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article attempts to understand the characteristics of the management of historical records and documents in the Joseon Period, compared with that of the Edo Period in Japan. Sillok(實錄), Seungjeongwon-ilki(承政院日記), Bibyonsa-deungnok(備邊司謄錄), and various Eugwe(儀軌) show the essence of the historical record and the document culture of the Joseon Period. We can suggest Dokugawa-zikki(德川實紀), Yuhitssho-ikki(右筆所日記), Soshabanikki( 奏者番日記), and Soshaban-tedome(奏者番手留) as the records and documents of the Edo Period corresponding with those of the Joseon Period. There are some similarities between Joseon’s system of record and document management and that of the Edo Period, from the point of view that every office had its own system of recording and documenting. However, there was a difference in the system to make Sillok the highest level of records and documents by reporting and abridging from the records and documents that had been produced by every office, the original records and documents being discarded as hyuji (or disused papers for recycling) in the Joseon Period. In the Edo Period, by contrast, no record or document was ever discarded, except for special cases, but was preserved permanently, in other words, a permanent preservation system of records and documents. This point is the most important difference between two countries in their management of historical records and documents.
Abstract
This article attempts to understand the characteristics of the management of historical records and documents in the Joseon Period, compared with that of the Edo Period in Japan. Sillok(實錄), Seungjeongwon-ilki(承政院日記), Bibyonsa-deungnok(備邊司謄錄), and various Eugwe(儀軌) show the essence of the historical record and the document culture of the Joseon Period. We can suggest Dokugawa-zikki(德川實紀), Yuhitssho-ikki(右筆所日記), Soshabanikki( 奏者番日記), and Soshaban-tedome(奏者番手留) as the records and documents of the Edo Period corresponding with those of the Joseon Period. There are some similarities between Joseon’s system of record and document management and that of the Edo Period, from the point of view that every office had its own system of recording and documenting. However, there was a difference in the system to make Sillok the highest level of records and documents by reporting and abridging from the records and documents that had been produced by every office, the original records and documents being discarded as hyuji (or disused papers for recycling) in the Joseon Period. In the Edo Period, by contrast, no record or document was ever discarded, except for special cases, but was preserved permanently, in other words, a permanent preservation system of records and documents. This point is the most important difference between two countries in their management of historical records and documents.
참고문헌 (31)
- 史庫址調査報告書, "國史編纂委員會", 國史編纂委員會, ~ (1986)
- 金慶洙, "朝鮮時代의 史官硏究" (1998), 國學資料院
- 김현영, "조선시대 실록의 편찬과 정부기록의 보존", 記錄保存, 6, pp.7~24 (1993), 정부기록보존소 총무처
- 金炫榮, "조선시대 지방 官衙에서의 기록의 생산과 보존", 古文書硏究, 28, pp.25~37 (2006), 한국고문서학회
- 김현영, "조선시대의 문서와 기록의 위상: 사초, 시정기에 대한 재검토", 古文書硏究, 32, pp.43~65 (2008), 한국고문서학회
- 배현숙, "朝鮮實錄硏究序說" (2002), 태일사
- 신병주, "承政院日記의 자료적 가치에 관한 연구", 奎章閣, 24, pp.1~20 (2001), 서울대학교 규장각 한국학연구원
- 신병주, "조선왕조실록의 奉安儀式과 관리", 韓國史硏究, 115, pp.75~105 (2001), 한국사연구회
- 신병주, "'實錄形止案'을 통해 본 조선왕조실록의 관리 체계", 國史館論叢, 102, pp.21~56 (2003), 국사편찬위원회
- 申奭鎬, "조선왕조실록의 편찬과 보관", 史叢, 5, pp.3~9 (1960), 고려대학교 역사연구소
- 吳恒寧, "實錄, 謄錄의 位階", 記錄學硏究, 3, pp.91~114 (2001), 한국기록학회
- 吳恒寧, "韓國 史官制度 成立史硏究" (2003), 한국연구원
- 吳恒寧, "(역주)선조실록수정청의궤" (2004), 일지사
- 吳恒寧, "일기청등록" (2005), 민족문화추진회
- 車勇杰, "조선왕조실록의 편찬태도와 사관의 역사인식", 韓國史論, 6, pp.146~185 (1979), 국사편찬위원회
- 한우근, "조선전기 실록편찬과 史官에 관한 연구", 震檀學報, 66, pp.77~130 (1988), 진단학회
- 大友一雄, "江戶幕府と情報管理" (2003), 臨川書店
- 大友一雄, "中近世アーカイブズの多國間比較" (2009), 岩田書院
- 國文學硏究資料館, "中近世アーカイブズの多國間比較" (2009), 岩田書院
- 國文學硏究資料館史料館, "アーカイブズの科學" (2003), 柏書房
- 小宮木代良, "家綱將軍初期(慶安4年4月より万治3年)における幕府記錄について", 東京大學史料編纂所硏究紀要, 10, pp.39~58 (2000), 東京大学史料編纂所
- 小宮木代良, "江戸幕府の日記と儀礼史料" (2006), 吉川弘文館
- 笠谷和比古, "日本近世史料学研究: 史料空間論への旅立ち" (2000), 北海道大学図書刊行会
- 白井哲哉, "江戸幕府の書物編纂と寛政改革", 日本歷史, 563, pp.72~84 (1995), 日本歴史学会
- 高橋一樹, "中近世アーカイブズの多國間比較" (2009), 岩田書院
- 崔承煕, "朝鮮王朝実録の編纂について", 史料館硏究紀要, 32, pp.200~203 (2001), 国文学研究資料館史料館
- 深井雅海, "江戶城-本丸御殿と幕府政治" (2008), 中央公論新社
- 福田千鶴, "日本近世史料学研究: 史料空間論への旅立ち" (2000), 北海道大学図書刊行会
- 藤實久美子, "本朝通鑑 編修と史料収集--対朝廷･武家の場合", 史料館研究紀要, 30, pp.115~153 (1999)
- 藤實久美子, "徳川実紀の編纂について", 史料館硏究紀要, 32, pp.181~199 (2001), 国文学研究資料館史料館
- 渡辺恒一, "武家の儀礼と式書･式図--若君様御成并還御之節外向之図", 彦根城博物館だより, 50 (2000), 彦根城博物館