본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Source of Evil in Rousseau's Confessions: A Reply to Augustine's Confessions

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article argues that Rousseau’s account of the source of evil in his Confessions was in fact a reply to Augustine’s Confessions. By taking Confessions as the title of his autobiography, it believes, Rousseau wanted his readers to relate his book to Augustine’s. There are thematic and structural similarities in two Confessions. And the main themes of both Confessions are problem of evil and human salvation. This article, therefore, reads very closely both Confessions together in this comparative perspective, especially some key accounts of the source of evil in two Confessions. It is only this detailed exegetical consideration of both texts in comparison that leads us to clear and full understanding that Rousseau intended his secular account of the problem of evil to be a response to Augustine’s account, especially to Augustine’s doctrine of original sin. Rousseau turned around the whole discussion of the source of evil from an ontological and theological discourse to a philosophical and social discourse, so as to pave the way to an ethics that is based upon human autonomy instead of theistic transcendence. Rousseau’s secular account of problem of evil, therefore, took the human salvation away from God, and attributed it to the human heart itself.

Abstract

This article argues that Rousseau’s account of the source of evil in his Confessions was in fact a reply to Augustine’s Confessions. By taking Confessions as the title of his autobiography, it believes, Rousseau wanted his readers to relate his book to Augustine’s. There are thematic and structural similarities in two Confessions. And the main themes of both Confessions are problem of evil and human salvation. This article, therefore, reads very closely both Confessions together in this comparative perspective, especially some key accounts of the source of evil in two Confessions. It is only this detailed exegetical consideration of both texts in comparison that leads us to clear and full understanding that Rousseau intended his secular account of the problem of evil to be a response to Augustine’s account, especially to Augustine’s doctrine of original sin. Rousseau turned around the whole discussion of the source of evil from an ontological and theological discourse to a philosophical and social discourse, so as to pave the way to an ethics that is based upon human autonomy instead of theistic transcendence. Rousseau’s secular account of problem of evil, therefore, took the human salvation away from God, and attributed it to the human heart itself.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Alberg, Jeremiah, "Rousseau and Original Sin", Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 57(4) (2001)
  2. Archambault, Paul J, "Rousseau’s Tactical (Mis)leading of Augustine", Symposium, 41(1) (1987)
  3. Augustine, "Christian Instruction, Admonition and Grace, the Christian Combat, Faith, Hope and Charity" (1947), Cima
  4. Augustine, "The Teacher, The Free Choice of Will, Grace and Free Will. Trans" (1968), Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press
  5. Augustine, "On Two Souls, Against the Manichees. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Part 4" (2004), Kessinger Publishing
  6. Augustine, "Confessions" (1998), Oxford University Press
  7. Babcock, William S, "Augustine on Sin and Moral Agency", The Journal of Religious Ethics, 16(1) (1988)
  8. Cladis, Mark S, "Rousseau’s Soteriology: Deliverance at the Crossroad", Religious Studies, 32(1) (1996)
  9. Gilson, Etienne, "The Christian Philosophy of Saint Augustine" (1960), Random House
  10. Gossman, Lionel, "The Innocent Art of Confession and Reverie", Daedalus, 107 (1978)
  11. Grant, Ruth W, "The Rousseauan Revolution and the Problem of Evil, Naming Evil, Judging Evil" (2006), The University of Chicago Press
  12. Guéhenno, Jean, "Jean-Jacques Rousseau vol. 2" (1966), Columbia University Press
  13. Hartle, Ann, "The Modern Self in Rousseau’s Confessions, A Reply to St. Augustine" (1983), University of Notre Dame Press
  14. Henrici, Peter, "The Philosophers and Original Sin", Communio, 18 (1991)
  15. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, "The Confessions, and Correspondence, Including the Letters to Malesherbes" (1998), University Press of New England
  16. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, "The First and Second Discourses, Together with the Replies to Critics and Essay on the Origin of Languages" (1990), Harper & Row Publishers
  17. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, "Letter to Beaumont, Letters Written from the Mountain, and Related Writings" (2001), University Press of New England
  18. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, "Emile, or On Education" (1979), Basic Books

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)