Posthumanist Selfhood: Challenges to Being a Conglomerate
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article drafts an overview of transhumanist and posthumanist ontologies, as well as provides grounds for their historical distinction based on their relationship to enlightenment humanism. By exploring their relationship and challenge to the dualistic metaphysics of enlightenment humanism, the essay makes clear that these two movements have distinctly different philosophical foundations. Transhumanism is critiqued for its reliance and intensification of dualistic attributes as virtues for its conceived ends, while posthumanism is shown to argue for a redeployment of ontological frameworks but without a complete or convincing response to the problematic dualisms that have been a part of the philosophical tradition since antiquity. Importantly, focus is placed on the role of technology in the makeup of both transhumanism and posthumanism. Technology holds a central place in each movement, but for very different reasons. Thus, the article pays attention to detailing technology’s relationship to the manner in which both movements construct notions of the human being as an ontological entity. By focusing on the notion of the human as a concept and by placing these movements in context, while revealing their philosophical groundwork, the article outlines the challenges facing each movement and the paradoxical byproducts that each generate. Through a philosophical lens, these movements are assessed along with their contemporary attempts to provide new, and simultaneously reinforce old, ontological paradigms.
Abstract
This article drafts an overview of transhumanist and posthumanist ontologies, as well as provides grounds for their historical distinction based on their relationship to enlightenment humanism. By exploring their relationship and challenge to the dualistic metaphysics of enlightenment humanism, the essay makes clear that these two movements have distinctly different philosophical foundations. Transhumanism is critiqued for its reliance and intensification of dualistic attributes as virtues for its conceived ends, while posthumanism is shown to argue for a redeployment of ontological frameworks but without a complete or convincing response to the problematic dualisms that have been a part of the philosophical tradition since antiquity. Importantly, focus is placed on the role of technology in the makeup of both transhumanism and posthumanism. Technology holds a central place in each movement, but for very different reasons. Thus, the article pays attention to detailing technology’s relationship to the manner in which both movements construct notions of the human being as an ontological entity. By focusing on the notion of the human as a concept and by placing these movements in context, while revealing their philosophical groundwork, the article outlines the challenges facing each movement and the paradoxical byproducts that each generate. Through a philosophical lens, these movements are assessed along with their contemporary attempts to provide new, and simultaneously reinforce old, ontological paradigms.
참고문헌 (15)
- Aristotle, "Book VI" (1934), Loeb-Harvard University Press
- Bijker, Wiebe E., "The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and the History of Technology" (1987), MIT Press
- Dennett, Daniel, "Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meaning of Life" (1996), Simon and Schuster
- Hale, Benjamin, "New Waves in the Technology of Philosophy" (2009), Palgrave Macmillan
- Heidegger, Martin, "The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays" (1977), Harper and Row Publishers
- Hughes, Thomas Parke, "Human-Built World: How to Think about Technology and Culture" (2004), University of Chicago Press
- Ihde, Don, "Merleau-Ponty and Epistemology Engines", Human Studies, 27(4), pp.361~376 (2004)
- Latour, Bruno, "Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Latour, Bruno, "Morality and Technology: The End of the Means", Theory, Culture & Society, 19, pp.247~260 (2002)
- Latour, Bruno, "Pandora’s Hope: Essays On the Reality of Science Studies" (1999), Harvard University Press
- Latour, Bruno, "We Have Never Been Modern" (1993), Harvester Wheatsheaf
- Merleau-Ponty, M., "International Library of Philosophy and Scientific Method" (1962), Routledge
- Nietzsche, Friedrich, "The Gay Science: With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Pickering, Andrew, "The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Winner, Langdon, "Human Nature Obsolete?" (2005), MIT Press