본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Mandarin Bare Classifier-Nouns: Towards a Universal Structure for Classifiers and Plurals

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Mandarin, as other classifier languages, usually requires a classifier when numerals, quantifiers, or demonstratives are present, but also allows bare classifier-nouns (CL-N) without any determiners. This paper examines two empirical questions: (i)What is the structure of CL-N that can account for its behavior? (ii) Under what conditions are bare CL-Ns acceptable? Following Borer’s Exo-Skeletal framework, I draw a parallel between Mandarin classifiers and the English plural. Mandarin ben shu‘CL book’ and English books both are CLASSIFIER PHRASES carrying no quantity information. Numeral-classifier-nouns (Num-CL-Ns), such as san ben shu ‘three books,’ are QUANTITY PHRASES carrying quantity information. This proposal correctly predicts that CL-Ns and Num-CL-Ns have different distributions due to different structures. Supporting data are drawn from CL-Ns in argument and non-argument positions in various constructions to attest the prediction that when the quantity information is needed in the discourse, Num-CL-Ns will be obligatory; in contrast, when the quantity information is not crucial, CL-Ns will be preferred or obligatory.

Abstract

Mandarin, as other classifier languages, usually requires a classifier when numerals, quantifiers, or demonstratives are present, but also allows bare classifier-nouns (CL-N) without any determiners. This paper examines two empirical questions: (i)What is the structure of CL-N that can account for its behavior? (ii) Under what conditions are bare CL-Ns acceptable? Following Borer’s Exo-Skeletal framework, I draw a parallel between Mandarin classifiers and the English plural. Mandarin ben shu‘CL book’ and English books both are CLASSIFIER PHRASES carrying no quantity information. Numeral-classifier-nouns (Num-CL-Ns), such as san ben shu ‘three books,’ are QUANTITY PHRASES carrying quantity information. This proposal correctly predicts that CL-Ns and Num-CL-Ns have different distributions due to different structures. Supporting data are drawn from CL-Ns in argument and non-argument positions in various constructions to attest the prediction that when the quantity information is needed in the discourse, Num-CL-Ns will be obligatory; in contrast, when the quantity information is not crucial, CL-Ns will be preferred or obligatory.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Biq, Y-O, "Classifier and Construction: The Interaction of Grammatical Categories and Cognitive Strategies", Language and Linguistics, 3, pp.521~542 (2002)
  2. Borer, H, "In Name Only" (2005), Oxford University Press
  3. Borer, H, "The Normal Course of Events" (2005), Oxford University Press
  4. Hsiang-Hua Chang, "The Aspect Marker -Le in Early Child Mandarin", Journal of Universal Language, 14(1), pp.7~54 (2013), 언어연구소
  5. Chao, Y-R, "A Grammar of Spoken Chinese" (1968), University of California Press
  6. Chen, P, "Indefinite Determiner Introducing Definite Referent: Special Use of ‘Yi ‘One’ + Classifier’ in Chinese", Lingua, 113, pp.1169~1184 (2003)
  7. Cheng, L, "On Every Type of Quantificational Expression in Chinese", Paper presented at The Workshop on QP structure, nominalization, and the role of DP (2005)
  8. Cheng, L, "Bare and Not-So-Bare Nouns and the Structure of NP", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.509~542 (1999)
  9. Cheng, L, "The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax", pp.259~292 (2005), Oxford University Press
  10. Comrie, B, "Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems" (1976), Cambridge University Press
  11. Dowty, D, "Word Meaning and Montague Grammar" (1979), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  12. Egerod, S, "Tense, Aspect, and Action: Empirical and Theoretical Contributions to Language Typology", pp.279~309 (1994), Mouton de Gruyter
  13. Gao, Q, "Chinese NP Structure", Linguistics, 32, pp.475~510 (1994)
  14. Grice, H, "Studies in the Way of Words", pp.22~40 (1975), Harvard University Press
  15. Hu, F, "Numeral phrases and measure phrases" (1958), Xinzhishi Chubanshe
  16. Li, C, "Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar" (1981), University of California Press
  17. Li, P, "The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect in Chinese", First Language, 18(3), pp.311~350 (1998)
  18. Li, Y-H, "Argument Determiner Phrases and Number Phrases", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.693~702 (1998)
  19. Li, W, "Numeral-Classifiers as a Grounding in Mandarin Chinese", Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 28, pp.337~368 (2000)
  20. Li, W, "The Pragmatic Function of Numeral-Classifiers in Mandarin Chinese", Journal of Pragmatics, 32, pp.1113~1133 (2000)
  21. Liu, F-H, "Definite NPs and Telicity in Chinese", Snippets, 7, pp.13~15 (2003)
  22. Lü, S, "The paper collection of Chinese grammar", pp.69~94 (1945), Kexue chubanshe
  23. Lü, S, "800 Phrases of Modern Chinese" (1980), Shangwu yingshuguang
  24. Munn, A, "Number and Indefinites", Lingua, 115, pp.821~855 (2005)
  25. Peyraube, A, "Studia Lingusitica Serica", pp.131~145 (1998), Hong Kong City University
  26. Smith, C, "The Parameter of Aspect" (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  27. Soh, H, "Perspectives on Aspect", pp.199~216 (2005), Springer
  28. Sybesma, R, "Causatives and Accomplishments: The Case of Chinese ba", 박사, Leiden University, 1992
  29. Tang, C-C, "A Note on the DP Analysis of the Chinese Noun Phrase", Linguistics, 28, pp.337~354 (1990)
  30. Yang, R, "Common Nouns, Classifiers, and Quantification in Chinese", 박사, pp.2001

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)