안원 교육 사상의 특징과 현대적 가치 탐구
Educational Features and Modern Value in Yan Yuan(顔元)’s Thoughts
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is an object of this study to find out education ideological features of innovative thinkers Yan Yuan in late 17 century of Ming and early Qing dynasty and based on this to study what kind of value Yan Yuan’s thought have in Korean education. Additionally it is aimed that Yan Yuan’s thoughts are known in the academic world, and also expanded in-depth research, contributing to solve the Korean education problem. In this paper, the features of the Yan Yuan’s educational thought are regarded as ethology, criticism and practical philosophy(習行哲學). Feature in ethology is that human nature is originally gently but dyed evil by habit(引弊習 染) so performing and practising the six arts help correcting. In the spirit of Criticism Yan Yuan blamed the incompetence of Neo-Confucianism and claimed to go back to Confucius’ Tao. He claimed to look at the new reality back to the fundamentals criticizing Confucianism in Han and Song Dynasty. In the spirit of practical philosophy, he pointed out the emptiness in the concept of Neo-Confucianism and presented the education of practice and experiment. Yan Yuan grew in an atmosphere of the childhood when Neo-Confucianism had a significant social impact. But Yan Yuan criticized Neo-Confucianism and emphasized the need for practical and realistic study. These points are still meaningful in education in Korea. Education for the whole person currently highlighted is necessary by emphasis on action and practice based on the assertion of Yan Yuan. In addition, it is necessary to have correct criticism spirit accurately diagnose the problem of education as Yan Yuan pointed out the problem on education blamed the incompetence of Neo-Confucianism and claimed to go back to Confucius’ Tao at that time. For the more, practical philosophy spirit is worth in the process of structural adjustment in the Department consolidation of recent university. What our society need now is to practice the meaning of education back to the root of education as Yan Yuan blamed the incompetence of Neo-Confucianism and claimed to go back to Confucius’ Tao. Education from ancient times changed and leaded the society of that times, and created new value and methods. Being parasitic on the age and ignoring the needs of the times is not a suitable education. A key element of education is the correct reflection on self and here now as Yan Yuan did.
Abstract
It is an object of this study to find out education ideological features of innovative thinkers Yan Yuan in late 17 century of Ming and early Qing dynasty and based on this to study what kind of value Yan Yuan’s thought have in Korean education. Additionally it is aimed that Yan Yuan’s thoughts are known in the academic world, and also expanded in-depth research, contributing to solve the Korean education problem. In this paper, the features of the Yan Yuan’s educational thought are regarded as ethology, criticism and practical philosophy(習行哲學). Feature in ethology is that human nature is originally gently but dyed evil by habit(引弊習 染) so performing and practising the six arts help correcting. In the spirit of Criticism Yan Yuan blamed the incompetence of Neo-Confucianism and claimed to go back to Confucius’ Tao. He claimed to look at the new reality back to the fundamentals criticizing Confucianism in Han and Song Dynasty. In the spirit of practical philosophy, he pointed out the emptiness in the concept of Neo-Confucianism and presented the education of practice and experiment. Yan Yuan grew in an atmosphere of the childhood when Neo-Confucianism had a significant social impact. But Yan Yuan criticized Neo-Confucianism and emphasized the need for practical and realistic study. These points are still meaningful in education in Korea. Education for the whole person currently highlighted is necessary by emphasis on action and practice based on the assertion of Yan Yuan. In addition, it is necessary to have correct criticism spirit accurately diagnose the problem of education as Yan Yuan pointed out the problem on education blamed the incompetence of Neo-Confucianism and claimed to go back to Confucius’ Tao at that time. For the more, practical philosophy spirit is worth in the process of structural adjustment in the Department consolidation of recent university. What our society need now is to practice the meaning of education back to the root of education as Yan Yuan blamed the incompetence of Neo-Confucianism and claimed to go back to Confucius’ Tao. Education from ancient times changed and leaded the society of that times, and created new value and methods. Being parasitic on the age and ignoring the needs of the times is not a suitable education. A key element of education is the correct reflection on self and here now as Yan Yuan did.
참고문헌 (21)
- 강태중, "한국인은 누구인가 - 한국인은 새로운 것에 개방적인가" (2013), 21세기북스
- 국정브리핑 특별기획팀, "대한민국교육 40년" (2007), 한스미디어
- 박의수, "교육의 역사와 철학" (2004), 동문사
- 王茂, "청대철학 1" (1995), 신원문화사
- 이나미, "한국사회와 그 적들" (2013), 추수밭
- 카이윙, "예교주의" (2013), 모노그래프
- 孫培靑, "中國敎育思想史(二)" (1997), 華東師範大學出版社
- 顔元, "顔元集 上ㆍ下" (1987), 中華書局
- 梁啓超, "淸代學術槪論" (1987), 驪江出版社
- 劉建國, "中國哲學史史料學槪要 上" (1981), 吉林人民出版社
- 陸九淵, "陸九淵集⋅語錄上" (1980), 中華書局
- 朱熹, "學規類編⋅讀經" (1936), 商務印書館
- 朱熹, "性理精義⋅總論爲學之方" (1936), 上海古籍出版社
- 陳山榜, "顔元評傳" (2004), 人民敎育出版社
- Tu Wei-ming, "The Unfolding of New-Confucianism" (1975), Columbia Press
- 김덕삼, "顔元의 비판정신과 인문학의 반성", 유교사상문화연구, (62), pp.125~149 (2015), 한국유교학회
- 양희용, "顔元의 格物致知에 관한 연구", 양명학, (16), pp.395~423 (2006), 한국양명학회
- 이경자, "중국 고대의 六藝 교육", 윤리교육연구, (22), pp.157~176 (2010), 한국윤리교육학회
- 장원철, "明末淸初 顔元의 학문과 사상에 대하여", 南冥學硏究, (29), pp.329~368 (2010), 경남문화연구원
- 한국경제, "일본이 전인교육 아닌 직업교육으로 옮겨가는 이유", 한국경제ㆍ사설, ~ (2015)
- "일본이 전인교육 아닌 직업교육으로 옮겨가는 이유" (2015)[URL]