1930년대 대만문단의 향토문학/대만화문 논쟁의 쟁점과 성과
The Focus and the Achievements of the Local Literature / Debate of the Spoken and Written Taiwanese in the 1930s Taiwan Literature Circle
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The local literature / debate of the spoken and written Taiwanese that took place in the 1930s Taiwan literary circle originated from the debates of the ways and manner of the literary popularization in the left-wing literary circle. There were two concentrated debates between 1930 to 1934, emphasizing: first, the definition of local literature, and the question of performance in practical writing; Second, the choice of the literary language between the mandarin Chinese and the Taiwanese vernaculars. Third, opinions about proposing the construction of the Taiwanese vernaculars. Although the debate is originated from the viewpoint of left-wing literary circle, it was environmentally confined by many conditions and restrictions in Taiwan’s early literary colonial era. Therefore, it was not limited by the left-wing literary circle, but the intellectuals in other camps also heavily participated, and commonly thinking about the development and the direction of the colonial literature during the period of establishing modern literature. This article will first conduct a comprehensive survey of the causes, paths, processes, focuses and the thought behind the participants of the local literature / debate of the spoken and written Taiwanese, and then arrange the significance and achievements of the debate in the colonial Taiwan literary circle, as a basis for understanding the 1930s historical conditions of the Taiwan Literature in Colonial Period.
Abstract
The local literature / debate of the spoken and written Taiwanese that took place in the 1930s Taiwan literary circle originated from the debates of the ways and manner of the literary popularization in the left-wing literary circle. There were two concentrated debates between 1930 to 1934, emphasizing: first, the definition of local literature, and the question of performance in practical writing; Second, the choice of the literary language between the mandarin Chinese and the Taiwanese vernaculars. Third, opinions about proposing the construction of the Taiwanese vernaculars. Although the debate is originated from the viewpoint of left-wing literary circle, it was environmentally confined by many conditions and restrictions in Taiwan’s early literary colonial era. Therefore, it was not limited by the left-wing literary circle, but the intellectuals in other camps also heavily participated, and commonly thinking about the development and the direction of the colonial literature during the period of establishing modern literature. This article will first conduct a comprehensive survey of the causes, paths, processes, focuses and the thought behind the participants of the local literature / debate of the spoken and written Taiwanese, and then arrange the significance and achievements of the debate in the colonial Taiwan literary circle, as a basis for understanding the 1930s historical conditions of the Taiwan Literature in Colonial Period.
참고문헌 (36)
- 一吼, "拍賣民衆", 南音, 1(6) (1932)
- 李獻璋, "臺灣話文討論欄-新字文字", 南音, 1(5) (1932)
- 克夫, "鄕土文學的檢討-讀黃石輝君的高論", 台灣新民報, 377 (1931)
- 克夫, "對臺灣鄕土文學的認識(三)", 臺灣新民報, 941 (1933)
- 吳坤煌, "論台灣的鄕土文學", フォルモサ(福爾摩莎), 2 (1933)
- 林克夫, "淸算過去的誤謬-確立大衆化的根本問題", 臺灣文藝, 2(1) (1935)
- 負人, "臺灣話文雜駁(一～四)", 南音, 1, pp.1(1 (1932), 7)[DOI]
- 郭秋生, "還在絶對的主張建設臺灣話文(一)", 臺灣新民報, 980 (1933)
- 郭秋生, "建設｢台灣話文｣一提案", 臺灣新聞, ~ (1931)
- 淸葉, "具有獨特性的臺灣文學之建設-我的鄕土文學觀", 文學臺灣, 38, pp.47~51 (2001)
- 黃石輝, "怎樣不提倡鄕土文學(一～三)", 伍人報, 9(11) (1930)
- 黃石輝, "再談鄕土文學", 台灣新聞, ~ (1931)
- 黃石輝, "我的幾句答辯(上", 中), 1931, pp.142(3), ~
- 黃石輝, "所謂｢運動狂｣的喊聲-給春榮克夫二先生(中)", 臺灣新民報, 968 (1933)
- 黃石輝, "解剖明弘君的愚論(五)", 臺灣新民報, 978 (1933)
- 黃石輝, "臺灣話文討論欄-答負人", 南音, 1(8) (1932)
- 黃石輝, "所謂｢運動狂｣的喊聲-給春榮克夫二先生(上)", 臺灣新民報, 967 (1933)
- 逸生, "對鄕土文學來說幾句", 臺灣新民報, 935 (1930)
- 越峰, "對｢建設臺灣鄕土文學的形式的芻議｣的異議", 臺灣新民報, 914 (1933)
- 毓文, "我的希望", 臺灣新聞, ~ (1932)
- 毓文, "給黃石輝先生-鄕土文學的吟味(一～二)", 昭和新聞, 140~141 (1931)
- 賴和, "臺灣話文的新字問題(一)-給郭秋生", 南音, 1(3) (1932)
- 賴明弘, "做個鄕土人的感想", 臺灣新聞, ~ (1931)
- 賴明弘, "對鄕土文學臺灣話文絶對反對(二)", 臺灣新民報, 956 (1933)
- 賴明弘, "絶對反對建設臺灣話文摧翻一切邪說(二)", 新高新報, 411 (1934)
- 點人, "檢討｢再談鄕土文學｣", 臺灣新聞, ~ (1931)
- 櫪馬, "幾句補足(上", 下), 1933, pp.934(5), ~
- 中島利郞, "1930年代臺灣鄕土文學論戰資料彙編" (2003), 春暉出版社
- 施懿琳, "民歌采集史上的一頁補白-蕭永東在≪三六九小報≫的民歌仿作及其價值", 第三屆 通俗文學與雅正文學全國學術研討會論文集 (2002), 新文豐
- 王美惠, "1930年代台灣新文學作家的民間文學理念與實踐-以＜台灣民間文學集＞爲考察對象", 博士, pp.2008
- 陳淑容, "1930年代鄕土文學⋅臺灣話文論爭及其餘波", 碩士, pp.2001
- 崔末順, "現代性與臺灣文學的發展(1920-1949)", 博士, pp.2004
- 崔末順, "跨國的殖民記憶與戰後經驗－台灣文學的比較文學研究" (2011), 國立清華大學台文所
- 崔末順, "殖民地自治論與葉榮鐘的朝鮮行", 第17屆中國韓國學國際學術研討會 (2016), 山東大學韓國學院
- 游勝冠, "臺灣文學本土論的興起" (1996), 前衛出版社
- 趙勳達, "文藝大衆化的三線糾葛-1930年代臺灣左右翼知識份子與新傳統主義者的文化思維及其角力", 博士, pp.2009