본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유표성 일반화와 한국어 관계절 습득의 관련성에 관한 연구

On the relation between the markedness generalization and the acquisition of Korean relative clauses.

김창구
동북아시아문화학회 (The Association of North-East Asian Cultures)|2010.03|동북아 문화연구 (Journal of North-east Asian Cultures)|제1권 제22호|pp. 85-107|DOI 10.17949/jneac.1.22.201003.005

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

투사명사구접근위계유표성 일반화유생성입력처리교수관계절화NPAHmarkedness generalizationprojectanimacyprocessing instructionrelativization
주제분류학제간연구

초록

Although Keenan Comrie(1977)'s NPAH hypothesis is widely believed to predict the difficulty order of relative clauses(RCs) in SLA, most studies have been conducted on English(& European languages). So this study tests the NPAH's applicability to Korean language acquisition. The analysis of Chinese learners's speech corpus data(Study 1) and sentence combination production test(SCT: Study 2) results revealed that (a) learners used subject(SU) RCs more easier than direct object(DO) or oblique(OBL), (b) learners made strong association between SU and animate head nouns, DO/OBL and inanimate heads in speech corpus, but this tendency was not found on SCT(except SU). This study also dealt with (c) the different effects of formal instruction(PI & MOI), and (d) learners' ability to generalize their relativization knowledge to different types of RCs. Results of SCT revealed that (1) two types of instruction positively affected the rate of acquisition of RCs(PI=MOI). And (2) learners could generalize their relativization knowledge(DO) to another types(SU, OBL) equally.

Abstract

Although Keenan Comrie(1977)'s NPAH hypothesis is widely believed to predict the difficulty order of relative clauses(RCs) in SLA, most studies have been conducted on English(& European languages). So this study tests the NPAH's applicability to Korean language acquisition. The analysis of Chinese learners's speech corpus data(Study 1) and sentence combination production test(SCT: Study 2) results revealed that (a) learners used subject(SU) RCs more easier than direct object(DO) or oblique(OBL), (b) learners made strong association between SU and animate head nouns, DO/OBL and inanimate heads in speech corpus, but this tendency was not found on SCT(except SU). This study also dealt with (c) the different effects of formal instruction(PI & MOI), and (d) learners' ability to generalize their relativization knowledge to different types of RCs. Results of SCT revealed that (1) two types of instruction positively affected the rate of acquisition of RCs(PI=MOI). And (2) learners could generalize their relativization knowledge(DO) to another types(SU, OBL) equally.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. 고영근, "우리말 문법론", pp.502~504 (2008), 집문당
  2. 권재일, "한국어 통사론", pp.286~321 (1992), 민음사
  3. 김상수, "한국어 학습자 발화의 유창성 연구", 박사, pp.2009
  4. 김창구, "구조적 복잡성에 따른 한국어 관계절 습득 순서 연구", 경희동문 한국어교육 국제학술대회 및 한국어교육 국제심포지엄 발표, pp.183~195 (2009)
  5. 남기심, "표준국어문법론(개정판)", pp.375~389 (1995), 탑출판사
  6. 서정수, "국어문법", pp.1258~1286 (1994), 뿌리 깊은 나무
  7. 이홍식, "현대국어 관형절 연구", 석사, pp.1990
  8. 최인철, "명사구 접근성 위계와 영어 관계절 습득의 관련성 연구", 현대문법연구, 57(57), pp.267~292 (2009), 현대문법학회
  9. Ammar, A, "Teaching marked linguistic structures-More about the acquisition of relative clauses by Arab learners of English. In Investigations in instructed second language learning", pp.167~198 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
  10. Cho,S.K, "The acquisition of relative clauses: Experimental studies on Korean", 박사, pp.1999
  11. Croteau,K.C, "Second language acquisition of relative clause structures by learners of Italian, In Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy", pp.115~128 (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  12. Diessel,H, "On the role of frequency and similarity in the acquisition of subject and non-subject relative clauses. In Syntactic Complexity", pp.251~276 (2009), John Benjamins
  13. Doughty,C.J, "Second Language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization", SSLA, 13, pp.431~469 (1991)
  14. Eckman,F.R, "Hypothesis and Methods in Second Language Acquisition: Testing the Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy on Relative Clauses", SSLA, 29, pp.321~327 (2007)
  15. Eckman, F. R, "On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language", Applied Linguistics, 9, pp.1~20 (1988)
  16. Ellis,R, "The study of second language acquisition" (1994), Oxford University Press
  17. Gass, S, "Language transfer and universal grammatical relations", Language Learning, 29, pp.327~344 (1979)
  18. Gass,S, "From theory to practice. In", On TESOL '81: Selected Papers of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, pp.129~139 (1982), TESOL
  19. Hamilton, R. L, "Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Evidence from relativization instruction in a second language", Language Learning, 44, pp.123~157 (1994)
  20. Hansen-Strain, L, "Variation in the relative clause of Japanese learners", JALT Journal, 11, pp.211~237 (1989)
  21. Hyltenstam,K, "The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition; The case of pronominal copies in relative clauses, In Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective", pp.39~60 (1984), Newbury House Publishers
  22. Jeon, K. S, "Relativization in Korean as a Foreign Language", SSLA, 29, pp.253~276 (2007)
  23. Jeon,K.S, "Interaction-driven learning: Characterizing linguistic development", 박사, pp.2004
  24. 조미정, "The Structure of Relative Clauses in Korean", 생성문법연구, 12(1), pp.107~138 (2002), 한국생성문법학회
  25. Jun,J.S, "The agent-first strategy and the development of languages: cases of learning two languages simultaneously in Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics Ⅸ", pp.46~55 (2001)
  26. Kanno, K, "Factors Affecting RC Processing", SSLA, 29, pp.197~218 (2007)
  27. Keenan, E, "Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.63~99 (1977)
  28. Kim,Y.J, "The acquisition of relative clauses in English and Korean: Development in spontaneous production", 박사, pp.1987
  29. 이귀옥, "Quantitative Differences in the Processing of Relative Clauses between Monolingual and Bilingual Speakers", 담화와 인지, 11(1), pp.215~236 (2004), 담화·인지언어학회
  30. Lee,K.O, "On the first language acquisition of relative clauses in Korean: The universal structure of COMP", 박사, pp.1991
  31. Sun-Young Lee, "Relative Clauses and Subject-drop in KSL Learners' Writing: Sentence Processing Approach", 어학연구, 41(2), pp.405~436 (2005), 언어교육원
  32. MacWhinney, B, "The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing" (1989), Cambridge
  33. Yip, V, "Relative Clauses in Bilingual Children", SSLA, 29, pp.277~300 (2007)
  34. Mellow,D, "The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clauses", Applied Linguistics, 27, pp.620~644 (2006)
  35. Mitchell, J .G, "The acquisition of relative clause structures in French as a second language", 박사, pp.2001
  36. O'Grady, W, "A subject-object asymmetry in the acquisition of relative clauses in Korean as a second language", SSLA, 25, pp.433~448 (2003)
  37. Ozeki,H, "Daiichi․daini gengo Nihongo meishi syushokusetsu syutoku katei" (2008), Kurosio
  38. Ozeki, H, "Does the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses?", SSLA, 29, pp.169~196 (2007)
  39. Pavesi, M, "Markedness, discoursal models, and relative clause formation in a formal and informal context", SSLA, 8, pp.38~55 (1986)
  40. Pienemann,M, "Language Processing and Second-Language Development: Processability Theory", pp.229~264 (1998), John Benjamins
  41. Roberts, M, "Implicational markedness and the acquisition of relativization by adult learners of Japanese as a foreign language", 박사, pp.2000
  42. Rosenbaum,H, "Relative clauses structures in informal conversation. In Studies presented to Emmon Bach by his students", pp.165~173 (1979), University of Massachusettts
  43. Sadighi, F, "The acquisition of English restrictive relative clauses by Chinese, Japanese, and Korean adult native speakers", International Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, pp.141~153 (1994)
  44. Sakamoto, T, "Nihongo no kankeisetu no syuutoku ni tuite", Nanzan-Daigaku Kyoiku Sentaa Kiyoo, 1, pp.114~126 (2000)
  45. Schumann,J.H, "The acquisition of English relative clauses by second language learners. In Research in Second Language Acquisition: Selected Papers of the Los Angeles Second Language Acquisition Research Forum", pp.118~131 (1980), Newbury House
  46. Shin, K. S, "Characteristics of the relative clause in Korean and the problems second language learners experience in acquiring the relative clause", 박사, pp.2003
  47. Song,J.J, "언어유형론: 형태론과 통사론" (2001), 보고사
  48. Tarallo, F, "Interference and natural language in second language acquisition", Language Learning, 33, pp.55~76 (1983)
  49. Tarone, E, "On the variability of interlanguage system", Applied Linguistics, 4, pp.152~163 (1983)
  50. VanPatten,B, "Input Processing and Grammar Instruction: Theory and Research" (1996), Ablex
  51. Wajnryb,R, "Grammar dictation" (1990), Oxford University Press
  52. Yabuki-Soh, N, "Teaching Japanese Relative Clauses", SSLA, 29, pp.219~252 (2007)
  53. Zobl, H, "Markedness and the projection problem", Language Learning, 33, pp.293~313 (1983)
  54. Zobl,H, "Grammars in search of input and intake. In Input in second language acquisition", pp.329~344 (1985), Newbury House

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)

정지용 시의 음운론적 특성 분석조성문pp. 5-19장응진 소설의 성경 모티프 연구 - 일본 유학 시절 작품을 대상으로 -최호석pp. 21-36凡父 金鼎卨 연구의 현황과 과제최재목pp. 37-59凡父 김정설의 <國民倫理論>에 대하여 - 「國民倫理特講」을 中心으로 -우기정pp. 61-83스토리텔링 기법을 통한 한국어 교재 구성채영희, 이미지pp. 109-121
원문 보기