본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

近代日本における「多民族国家」的日本観の起源 ―原敬を中心に―

Origins of a Modern Conception of Japan as‘Multiethnic Nation’ ―The Case of HARA Takashi―

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

On May 23, 1881, journalist HARA Takashi(1856-1921) left Tokyo to embark on a nationwide tour of inspection. His travel accounts were serialized in his newspaper and entitled‘Kaidai shūyū nikki(海内周遊日記)’. An examination of these articles reveals his educational theory concerning the‘Ainu’people. During his tour of Hokkaido, HARA observed the lives of the‘Ainu’who were an‘other’to the‘Wajin(和人)’. He concluded that the Japanese superiority complex which unconditionally ranked the‘Ainu’below the‘Wajin’was, in fact, erroneous. According to his argument, all people inhabiting the Japanese islands, while maintaining their historical identity of‘being Wajin’or ‘being Ainu’, should receive equal education to modernize. This conception of Japan as a multiethnic nation formed HARA’s basic theory of colonial policy after he became Prime Minister of Imperial Japan; a theory that denied cultural assimilation of the colonies, while also justifying their political domination.

Abstract

On May 23, 1881, journalist HARA Takashi(1856-1921) left Tokyo to embark on a nationwide tour of inspection. His travel accounts were serialized in his newspaper and entitled‘Kaidai shūyū nikki(海内周遊日記)’. An examination of these articles reveals his educational theory concerning the‘Ainu’people. During his tour of Hokkaido, HARA observed the lives of the‘Ainu’who were an‘other’to the‘Wajin(和人)’. He concluded that the Japanese superiority complex which unconditionally ranked the‘Ainu’below the‘Wajin’was, in fact, erroneous. According to his argument, all people inhabiting the Japanese islands, while maintaining their historical identity of‘being Wajin’or ‘being Ainu’, should receive equal education to modernize. This conception of Japan as a multiethnic nation formed HARA’s basic theory of colonial policy after he became Prime Minister of Imperial Japan; a theory that denied cultural assimilation of the colonies, while also justifying their political domination.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 小熊英二, "〈日本人〉の境界―沖縄・アイヌ・台湾・朝鮮―植民地支配から復帰運動まで―" (1998), 新曜社
  2. 河西英通, "東北―つくられた異境―" (2001), 中公新書
  3. 河野本道, "「アイヌ」―その再認識―歴史人類学的考察―" (1999), 北海道出版企画センター
  4. 坂野徹, "帝国日本と人類学者―1884-1952―" (2005), 勁草書房
  5. 鈴木啓孝, "旧藩の超越―明治10年代の陸羯南を題材として―", 歴史, 106, pp.97~121 (2006)
  6. テッサ, "辺境から眺める―アイヌが経験する近代―" (2000), みすず書房
  7. 鳥居龍蔵, "日本人類学の発達", pp.459~470 (1975), 朝日新聞社
  8. ナジタ, "原敬―政治技術の巨匠―" (1974), 読売新聞社
  9. 春山明哲, "近代日本の植民地政治と原敬. in: 日本植民地主義の政・治的展開―1885-1943―その政治体制と台湾の民族運動―" (1980), アジア政経学会
  10. 下, "『原敬全集』上", pp.1929, 春山明哲
  11. 春山明哲, "『原敬関係文書』1-11" (1984), 日本放送出版協会
  12. 下, "『原敬伝』上", pp.1943, 前田蓮山
  13. 丸山眞男, "忠誠と反逆", 近代日本思想史講座, 6 (1960), 筑摩書房
  14. 三谷太一郎, "日本政党政治の形成―原敬の政治指導の展開―" (1967), 東京大学出版会
  15. 下, "『評伝原敬』上", pp.1997, 山本四郎
  16. 安田浩, "近代日本における「民族」観念の形成", pp.61~72 (1992), 白石書房
  17. 吉崎祥司, "エスニシティとしての民族", pp.33~46 (1992), 白石書房
  18. 與那覇潤, "近代日本における「人種」観念の変容―「人類学」との関わりを中心に―", 民族学研究, 68(1), pp.85~97 (2003), 日本民族学会

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)