仁祖 전반기의 舊闕(昌慶宮)의 중건과 궁궐 경영 -『承政院日記』 인조 임어 기사의 분석 -
Renovation of the “Old Palace[舊闕]” (Chang’gyeong-gung/昌慶宮) during the early half period of King Injo/仁祖’s reign, and the Management of Palaces - Examination of records referring to Injo's whereabouts in 『Seungjeong-weon Ilgi/承政院日記』 -
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, the palace management that continued in the early half of King Injo’s reign(from his enthronement, and through the 14th year of his reign), and the renovation of the “Old Palace[舊闕]” (Chang’gyeong-gung/昌慶宮) which was the result of such efforts, are examined. At the time of Injo’s enthronement, there were two types of palaces being used inside the capital: the “Old Palaces” like Chang’deokgung/昌德宮 and Chang’gyeong-gung, which had already been renovated during King Gwang’hae-gun’s reign, and “New Palaces” such as Gyeong’un-gung/慶運宮 or In’gyeong-gung/仁慶宮 & Gyeong’deok-gung/慶德宮, which were only recently erected. Yet this situation considerably changed, coming into Injo’s reign. In the process of kicking Gwang’hae-gun/光海君 out of the throne, a fire broke out and incinerated the Chang’deok-gung palace. The Gyeong’un-gung palace was dismantled and returned to its original owner as well. Also, the ensuing insurrection of general Yi Gwal/李适 turned the Chang’gyeong-gung palace into ashes. This caused some trouble for the new government. The new regime, headed by King Injo, defined all the palace managements during the reign of Gwang’hae-gun as ‘bad governing(弊政),’ yet soon found itself in a dilemma which forced them to use all those palaces that they just labelled as examples of bad governing. Then, at the 10th year of Injo’s reign, the Injo government’s usage of palaces took a new and abrupt turn. After Queen Inmok Wang’hu/仁穆王后 died, a conspiracy of treason (and also an attempt to execrate the king himself) was revealed, and for safety issues Injo left the Gyeong’deok-gung palace. This was an intentional move on the king’s part, to minimize the political ramifications of the conspiracy, by leaving the place that was directly involved with the issue itself, for good. Injo, who decided to stay temporarily at the remaining Chang’deok-gung palace for the moment, dismantled the In’gyeong-gung palace next year and renovated the Chang’gyeong-gung palace. After the renovation was complete, he moved over to Chang’gyeong-gung, and until he was forced to leave the palace again due to the war with the Manchurian Qing(“Hu’geum”) forces, the Chang’gyeong-gung palace continued to serve as the king’s main residence. It was Injo’s intention to recreate the condition of the time of his initial enthronement, in which he began to live primarily at Chang’gyeong-gung right after he ascended to the throne.
Abstract
In this article, the palace management that continued in the early half of King Injo’s reign(from his enthronement, and through the 14th year of his reign), and the renovation of the “Old Palace[舊闕]” (Chang’gyeong-gung/昌慶宮) which was the result of such efforts, are examined. At the time of Injo’s enthronement, there were two types of palaces being used inside the capital: the “Old Palaces” like Chang’deokgung/昌德宮 and Chang’gyeong-gung, which had already been renovated during King Gwang’hae-gun’s reign, and “New Palaces” such as Gyeong’un-gung/慶運宮 or In’gyeong-gung/仁慶宮 & Gyeong’deok-gung/慶德宮, which were only recently erected. Yet this situation considerably changed, coming into Injo’s reign. In the process of kicking Gwang’hae-gun/光海君 out of the throne, a fire broke out and incinerated the Chang’deok-gung palace. The Gyeong’un-gung palace was dismantled and returned to its original owner as well. Also, the ensuing insurrection of general Yi Gwal/李适 turned the Chang’gyeong-gung palace into ashes. This caused some trouble for the new government. The new regime, headed by King Injo, defined all the palace managements during the reign of Gwang’hae-gun as ‘bad governing(弊政),’ yet soon found itself in a dilemma which forced them to use all those palaces that they just labelled as examples of bad governing. Then, at the 10th year of Injo’s reign, the Injo government’s usage of palaces took a new and abrupt turn. After Queen Inmok Wang’hu/仁穆王后 died, a conspiracy of treason (and also an attempt to execrate the king himself) was revealed, and for safety issues Injo left the Gyeong’deok-gung palace. This was an intentional move on the king’s part, to minimize the political ramifications of the conspiracy, by leaving the place that was directly involved with the issue itself, for good. Injo, who decided to stay temporarily at the remaining Chang’deok-gung palace for the moment, dismantled the In’gyeong-gung palace next year and renovated the Chang’gyeong-gung palace. After the renovation was complete, he moved over to Chang’gyeong-gung, and until he was forced to leave the palace again due to the war with the Manchurian Qing(“Hu’geum”) forces, the Chang’gyeong-gung palace continued to serve as the king’s main residence. It was Injo’s intention to recreate the condition of the time of his initial enthronement, in which he began to live primarily at Chang’gyeong-gung right after he ascended to the throne.
참고문헌 (23)
- "光海君日記", ~
- 金東旭, "仁祖朝의 昌慶宮·昌德宮 造營", 文化財, 19 (1985)
- 金世奉, "仁祖·孝宗代 山人勢力의 形成과 進出", 東洋學, 2 (1994)
- 金容欽, "朝鮮後期 政治史 硏究Ⅰ: 仁祖代 政治論의 分化의 變通論" (2006), 혜안
- 金澔, "효종대 조귀인 저주 사건과 東闕 改修 : 昌德昌慶宮修理都監儀軌 를 중심으로", 仁荷史學, 10 (2003)
- 김우철, "仁祖 24년(1646) 安益信 謀反 사건과 그 의미", 韓國史學報, (33), pp.247~280 (2008), 고려사학회
- 김인숙, "인조대의 궁중저주사건과 그 정치적 의미", 조선시대사학보, (31), pp.79~111 (2004), 조선시대사학회
- 李俸珪, "·金集의 禮學과 元宗追崇論爭의 철학사적 의미", 韓國思想史學, 11 (1998)
- 李迎春, "潛冶 朴知誡의 禮學과 元宗追崇論", 淸溪史學, 7 (1990)
- "承政院日記", ~
- 吳洙彰, "仁祖代 政治勢力의 動向", 韓國史學, 13 (1985)
- 禹仁秀, "朝鮮 仁祖代 政局의 動向과 士林의 役割", 大丘史學, 41 (1991)
- 윤정, "조선시대 魂殿 운영에 대한 기초적 정리", 奎章閣, 28, pp.87~88 (2005)
- 윤정, "宣祖후반~광해군 초반 궁궐 경영과 ‘慶運宮’의 수립", 서울학연구, (42), pp.259~299 (2011), 서울학연구소
- 윤정, "광해군대 궁궐 경영과‘新闕’의 영건 -慶德宮의 영건과 성격 변화를 중심으로-", 서울학연구, (43), pp.235~275 (2011), 서울학연구소
- 李根浩, "英祖代 <承政院日記> 改修過程의 검토", 조선시대사학보, (31), pp.143~173 (2004), 조선시대사학회
- "仁祖實錄", ~
- 張志連, "光海君代 宮闕營建 : 仁慶宮과 慶德宮(慶熙宮)의 창건을 중심으로", 韓國學報, 86 (1997)
- 池斗煥, "仁祖代 君子小人 論議", 韓國學論叢, 22 (2000)
- "昌慶宮修理所儀軌", ~
- 許捲洙, "仁祖朝 南人의 政界 進出과 西人과의 對立", 金世漢停年紀念論叢 (1991)
- 홍석주, "朝鮮朝 光海君代의 宮闕建築에 관한 硏究 : 仁慶宮과 慶德宮을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2000
- 홍석주, "光海君代의 宮闕 營建에 관한 연구", 건축역사연구, 21 (1999)
