근대적 복식 유행에 관한 중층적 평가와 이분법적 인식 - 1920년대~1930년대 유행 관련 기사를 중심으로 -
The Social Evaluations of Modern Fashion for Clothing and the Perception of Fashion Areas - Focusing on the Analyses of the Articles by the Media of the Press from the 1920s to 1930s -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is intended to find the perception of those contemporaries and the social evaluations about the modern fashion for clothing and the areas in which modern fashion appeared, spread and prevailed by analyzing the articles about the clothing fashion published by the press from the 1920s to the 1930s. The abolition of the inherited social status system, the finding of individual dignity, and the introduction of the capitalistic production methods built up the environments for mass consumption, and also the appearance of various media made it possible to transmit and spread fashion. These conditions contributed to the advent and spreading of modern fashion. The results of this research about the social evaluations of modern fashion for clothing and the perception of fashion areas are as follows. First, fashion was regarded as the reflection of the spirit of the age and modernity. Second, fashion was seen as the index of advanced sense and the Western world-oriented property. Third, fashion was evaluated as the expression of individual desires and the object of collective imitation. Fourth, fashion was thought of as an opportunity to form beauty sense and to change styles. The social evaluation of modern fashion extended to the perception of the areas from which fashion started, and people who followed fashion. At that time, fashion was thought to be transmitted in the order of the Western world, Japan, Gyeongseong (now Seoul) of Joseon, and provincial areas. The place in Joseon )in which fashion took place and showed itself exclusively was Gyeongseong, within which Jingogae and Jongro made a distinct difference from other regions in fashion. It was found that the provincial areas of those days were not equipped with external and internal conditions good enough to generate fashion, but maintained old-fashioned characteristics of space. Gyeongseong tended to be thought of differently from provincial areas in that it was the place where fashion was generated and formed.
Abstract
This study is intended to find the perception of those contemporaries and the social evaluations about the modern fashion for clothing and the areas in which modern fashion appeared, spread and prevailed by analyzing the articles about the clothing fashion published by the press from the 1920s to the 1930s. The abolition of the inherited social status system, the finding of individual dignity, and the introduction of the capitalistic production methods built up the environments for mass consumption, and also the appearance of various media made it possible to transmit and spread fashion. These conditions contributed to the advent and spreading of modern fashion. The results of this research about the social evaluations of modern fashion for clothing and the perception of fashion areas are as follows. First, fashion was regarded as the reflection of the spirit of the age and modernity. Second, fashion was seen as the index of advanced sense and the Western world-oriented property. Third, fashion was evaluated as the expression of individual desires and the object of collective imitation. Fourth, fashion was thought of as an opportunity to form beauty sense and to change styles. The social evaluation of modern fashion extended to the perception of the areas from which fashion started, and people who followed fashion. At that time, fashion was thought to be transmitted in the order of the Western world, Japan, Gyeongseong (now Seoul) of Joseon, and provincial areas. The place in Joseon )in which fashion took place and showed itself exclusively was Gyeongseong, within which Jingogae and Jongro made a distinct difference from other regions in fashion. It was found that the provincial areas of those days were not equipped with external and internal conditions good enough to generate fashion, but maintained old-fashioned characteristics of space. Gyeongseong tended to be thought of differently from provincial areas in that it was the place where fashion was generated and formed.
참고문헌 (24)
- G.Simmel, "Fashion", American Journal of Sociology, 62, pp.545~ (1957)
- H.Blumer, "Fashion: From Class Differentiation to Collective Selection", Sociological Quarterly, 10(3), pp.281~282 (1969)
- 보드리야르, "소비의 사회: 그 신화와 구조" (1991), 文藝出版社
- 연구공간 수유+너머 근대매체연구팀, "신여성", pp.76~87 (2005), 한겨레신문사
- 최병택, "경성리포트", pp.88~142 (2009), 시공사
- 김경일, "여성의 근대, 근대의 여성", pp.217~231 (2004), 푸른역사
- 권보드래, "연애의 시대" (2003), 현실문화연구
- 임옥희, "복장의 정치학과 식민지 여성의 소비공간. in: 한국의 식민지 근대와 여성공간" (2004), 여이연
- "別乾坤", ~
- "동아일보", ~
- "조선중앙일보", ~
- "新民", ~
- 金起林, "斷髮과 朝鮮女性 미쓰.코리아여 단발하시오", 東光, (37) (1932), 東光社
- 김진송, "서울에 딴스홀을 許하라", pp.178~181 (1999), 현실문화연구
- 리포베츠키, "패션의 제국", pp.105~106 (1999), 문예출판사
- "조선일보", ~
- "'중외일보' 1930년 8월 3일", ~ (1930)
- 정혜영, "여성노동공간의 다양화와 식민화. in: 한국의 식민지 근대와 여성공간", pp.323~ (2004), 여이연
- "新女性", ~
- 김영근, "일제하 식민지적 근대성의 한 특징: 경성에서의 도시 경험을 중심으로", 사회와 역사, 57, pp.15~18 (2000)
- "三千里", ~
- 김백영, "지배와 공간", pp.122~123 (2009), 문학과지성사
- 장희권, "근대의 도시공간과 사유방식", 뷔히너와 현대문학, 32, pp.205~234 (2009), 한국뷔히너학회
- 조희진, "조선의 색복화(色服化)를 위한 식민통치당국의 개입과 전략", 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 HK한국문화연구단 월요모임 (2010)
