錦帶 李家煥의 藏書 『古文淵鑑』
Gomunyeongam『古文淵鑑』, One of Lee Ga-hwan李家煥’s Collections
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article is an attempt to reveal the process of academic achievement of Lee Ga-hwan李家煥, a prominent scholar in the late Joseon Dynasty. As a victim of the Shinyu Persecution辛酉迫害, Lee Ga-hwan tends to be abstracted as a ‘a man of great erudition and genius’. Other than his proficiency in astronomical calculations introduced from the West, his achievements as a scholar have not been sufficiently highlighted. Among the books owned by Lee Ga-hwan, I found that Gomunyeongam『古文淵鑑』, Gihawonbon『幾何原本』(Euclid’s Elements), and Gyeongsepalpyeonyuchan『經世八編類纂』 are representative of his scholarly aspect, and through analyzing these three books in turn, I want to trace the process by which his erudition was formed. In this article, the first of them was focused on Gomunyeongam. This book, an anthology of Chinese classic prose, was compiled under the royal command during the reign of Emperor Kangxi of the Qing Dynasty. The Gomunyeongam owned by Lee Ga-hwan was purchased by his father, Lee Yong-hyu李用休 from an official interpreter Kim Hong-cheol金弘喆. According to Lee Ga-Hwan’s remarks, this book was given to Kim Hong-cheol’s grandfather, Kim Ji-nam金指南, by a relative of the emperor of the Qing Dynasty. It was originally produced for the emperor to see, so the printing and manufacturing of the book are exquisite and beautiful, especially the cover is bound with yellow silk. On the other hand, one Gomunyeongam stored in the National Library of Korea is bound with yellow silk, so it is presumed that the book is the one Lee Ga-hwan was referring to. This book had two collection seals indicating the original owner, but both were deleted. So, as of now, it is unknown whether the owner of this book was Lee Ga-hwan. However, it is noteworthy that there are other traces of deletion of certain contents in this book. Originally, in the margin at the top of the text of this book, there were printed criticisms written by 12 influential bureaucratic writers during the Qing Dynasty. However, in the yellow silk-covered Gomunyeongam housed in the National Library of Korea, all 100 or so critical writings written by Zhang Ying張英, one of the 12, have been deleted. Zhang Ying, a prominent bureaucrat and literary figure in the Qing Dynasty, is a person involved in the 1771 forbidden book case in Joseon. King Yeongjo expressed fierce hatred for both of them by mentioning Zhu Lin朱璘, the author of the Chinese history book Myeonggijipnyak『明紀緝略』, and Zhang Ying, who wrote the preface together. In addition, merchants who circulated Myeonggijipnyak in Joseon and the yangban class who possessed the book were caught, and some of them were beheaded. It is presumed that the deletion of Zhang Ying's criticism from the yellow silk-covered Gomunyeongam was a self-rescue measure attempted by an upper-class intellectual who had access to high-quality information related to the forbidden book case. He had removed anything related to the troubled figure from his book, in order not to be politically attacked for possessing a disturbing book. And there are several circumstances to think that Lee Ga-hwan was an upper-class intellectual who executed such a deletion. Lee Ga-hwan not only had the yellow silk-covered Gomunyeongam, but also read the book closely to fully grasp its format and content. In addition, Chae Je-gong蔡濟恭, an influential senior politician of Lee Ga-hwan, was the closest to King Yeongjo at the time, and supervised the resolution of the forbidden book case to suit the king’s wishes. In other words, Chae Je-gong was in a position to let Lee Ga-hwan know that Zhu Lin and Zhang Ying were the objects of the king’s anger. In this paper, through the analysis of Gomunyeongam that is believed to have belonged to Lee Ga-hwan, I tried to shed light on his appearance in his youth on the way to achievement as a bureaucratic writer, and reconstruct the cultural and political atmosphere of the Joseon intellectual class surrounding him. In the future, this work will be continued through Gihawonbon and Gyeongsepalpyeonyuchan.
Abstract
This article is an attempt to reveal the process of academic achievement of Lee Ga-hwan李家煥, a prominent scholar in the late Joseon Dynasty. As a victim of the Shinyu Persecution辛酉迫害, Lee Ga-hwan tends to be abstracted as a ‘a man of great erudition and genius’. Other than his proficiency in astronomical calculations introduced from the West, his achievements as a scholar have not been sufficiently highlighted. Among the books owned by Lee Ga-hwan, I found that Gomunyeongam『古文淵鑑』, Gihawonbon『幾何原本』(Euclid’s Elements), and Gyeongsepalpyeonyuchan『經世八編類纂』 are representative of his scholarly aspect, and through analyzing these three books in turn, I want to trace the process by which his erudition was formed. In this article, the first of them was focused on Gomunyeongam. This book, an anthology of Chinese classic prose, was compiled under the royal command during the reign of Emperor Kangxi of the Qing Dynasty. The Gomunyeongam owned by Lee Ga-hwan was purchased by his father, Lee Yong-hyu李用休 from an official interpreter Kim Hong-cheol金弘喆. According to Lee Ga-Hwan’s remarks, this book was given to Kim Hong-cheol’s grandfather, Kim Ji-nam金指南, by a relative of the emperor of the Qing Dynasty. It was originally produced for the emperor to see, so the printing and manufacturing of the book are exquisite and beautiful, especially the cover is bound with yellow silk. On the other hand, one Gomunyeongam stored in the National Library of Korea is bound with yellow silk, so it is presumed that the book is the one Lee Ga-hwan was referring to. This book had two collection seals indicating the original owner, but both were deleted. So, as of now, it is unknown whether the owner of this book was Lee Ga-hwan. However, it is noteworthy that there are other traces of deletion of certain contents in this book. Originally, in the margin at the top of the text of this book, there were printed criticisms written by 12 influential bureaucratic writers during the Qing Dynasty. However, in the yellow silk-covered Gomunyeongam housed in the National Library of Korea, all 100 or so critical writings written by Zhang Ying張英, one of the 12, have been deleted. Zhang Ying, a prominent bureaucrat and literary figure in the Qing Dynasty, is a person involved in the 1771 forbidden book case in Joseon. King Yeongjo expressed fierce hatred for both of them by mentioning Zhu Lin朱璘, the author of the Chinese history book Myeonggijipnyak『明紀緝略』, and Zhang Ying, who wrote the preface together. In addition, merchants who circulated Myeonggijipnyak in Joseon and the yangban class who possessed the book were caught, and some of them were beheaded. It is presumed that the deletion of Zhang Ying's criticism from the yellow silk-covered Gomunyeongam was a self-rescue measure attempted by an upper-class intellectual who had access to high-quality information related to the forbidden book case. He had removed anything related to the troubled figure from his book, in order not to be politically attacked for possessing a disturbing book. And there are several circumstances to think that Lee Ga-hwan was an upper-class intellectual who executed such a deletion. Lee Ga-hwan not only had the yellow silk-covered Gomunyeongam, but also read the book closely to fully grasp its format and content. In addition, Chae Je-gong蔡濟恭, an influential senior politician of Lee Ga-hwan, was the closest to King Yeongjo at the time, and supervised the resolution of the forbidden book case to suit the king’s wishes. In other words, Chae Je-gong was in a position to let Lee Ga-hwan know that Zhu Lin and Zhang Ying were the objects of the king’s anger. In this paper, through the analysis of Gomunyeongam that is believed to have belonged to Lee Ga-hwan, I tried to shed light on his appearance in his youth on the way to achievement as a bureaucratic writer, and reconstruct the cultural and political atmosphere of the Joseon intellectual class surrounding him. In the future, this work will be continued through Gihawonbon and Gyeongsepalpyeonyuchan.
참고문헌 (37)
- 하성래, "이가환과 서학과의 관계", 동아시아문화연구, 35 (2001)
- 문중양, "18세기말 천문역산 전문가의 과학활동과담론의 역사적 성격-徐浩修와 李家煥을 중심으로-", 동방학지, (121), pp.51~84 (2003), 국학연구원
- 구만옥, "朝鮮後期 天文曆算學의 주요 爭點-正祖의 天文策과 그에 대한 對策을 중심으로-", 한국사상사학, (27), pp.221~261 (2006), 한국사상사학회
- 정약용, "여유당문집 권15, 貞軒墓誌銘", ~
- 성대중, "청성잡기 권5, 醒言", ~
- 이가환, "錦帶詩文抄 下", ~
- 黃嗣永, "帛書", ~
- 여진천, "황사영 백서와 그 이본의 연구", 석사, 한국근세사, pp.1999
- 규장각한국학연구원, "규장각도서장서인보 2" (2019), 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원
- 안대회, "나를 돌려다오", pp.28~29 (2003), 태학사
- 이용휴, "奎章閣詩帖序", ~
- 김수진, "국가의 장서와 개인의 장서: 공사교직(公私交織)의 역사로 조명한 규장각 중국본 도서", 한국문화, (75), pp.13~44 (2016), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 이경근, "혜환 이용휴의 문예론 연구", 석사, 국문학, pp.2009
- 유만주, "흠영", ~
- 김하라, "일기를 쓰다 2", pp.98~99 (2015), 돌베개
- 이용휴, "𢾡𢿜集 雜著 題霞思稿", ~
- 金昌業, "연행일기", ~
- 최덕중, "일기", ~
- "규장각 중국본도서 형성사 연구", 연갑수[URL]
- 김하라, "『譯語類解』의 편찬과 譯官 金指南", 규장각, (50), pp.113~162 (2017), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- "淸實錄", ~
- "한국고문헌종합목록 누리집"[URL]
- 김하라, "‘金溪’・‘西齋’ 藏書印을 통해 본 奎章閣 藏書의 한 局面", 대동한문학(大東漢文學), 58(58), pp.289~318 (2019), 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회)[DOI]
- 성호기념관, "성호기념관소장유물명품선", pp.68~69 (2013), 안산시
- 李珖, "列聖御製", 규장각한국학연구원 소장도서(청구기호 古複 3422-51X) 마이크로 필름 M
- "승정원일기", ~
- 王亞楠, "『古文渊鉴』编撰理念述论", 语文知识, (4), pp.12~13 (2011)
- 章建文, "淸初文學批評語境下張英的文學觀—以『御選古文淵鑒』爲中心", 社會科學輯刊, 6 (2016)
- "조선왕조실록", ~
- 정길수, "李羲天論", 규장각, (27), pp.95~116 (2004), 규장각한국학연구원
- 장민영, "조선 영조대 '명기집략사건'의 정치적 성격", 석사, 한국사, pp.2011
- 정병설, "조선시대 대중국 역사변무의 의미", 역사비평, (116), pp.250~276 (2016), 역사문제연구소
- 박희병, "능호관 이인상 연보", pp.136~137 (2022), 돌베개
- 최성환, "영·정조대 채제공의 정치 생애와 정치 의리", 한국실학연구, (33), pp.187~228 (2017), 한국실학학회
- "국립중앙도서관 소장 『고문연감초』 해제", 함영대[URL]
- 김효경, "조선총독부도서관의 안정복 장서 수집과 자료적 특징", 古文書硏究, 43, pp.181~203 (2013), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
