조선 전기 개전 및 종전 의례의 구조와 사례
Structure and Example of Rituals of Opening and Ending the War in Early Joseon Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
War has always been a part of human history. The most critical difference between wartime and peacetime is whether murder is permissible. During war, acts that are taboo in civilized society, such as murder, are not only permitted but even encouraged. For this reason, from ancient times to modern times, there were few societies that did not perform any rituals when starting a war. Likewise, the transition from wartime to peacetime is equally important. This is because society can return to daily life by announcing that the abnormal state in which murder is encouraged has ended and returned to normal. From this perspective, the series of opening rituals that start a war and the ending rituals that conclude a war are one of the universal rituals of mankind. Traditionally, in Confucian society, it was considered an ideal to establish the country’s major rituals were classified and systematized into five kinds(Orye). Among them, the rituals of opening and ending the wars were generally placed as one of the ‘military rituals’. However, in the case of Joseon, in the process of establishing national rites according to the traditional Orye system, the rituals of opening and ending the wars were not included. Nevertheless, in the early Joseon Dynasty, the rituals of opening and ending the wars were often performed. In this study, we reviewed the cases of war opening and ending rituals implemented during the early Joseon Dynasty and estimated the reason why they were not established as national rituals even though they were implemented several times. First, Joseon’s military mobilization method, in which generals and soldiers started separately. It is important for the soldiers carrying out the war to participate in the ceremony for the opening of the war, which secures the legitimacy of the war and prays for victory. Therefore, there is a possibility that the opening ceremony could not have been regularized in a situation where generals and soldiers did not gather. Next, the war opening and closing rituals were conducted in a similar sequence to other rituals, ‘Gilye’. The various ceremonys performed during the war opening and closing rituals were not much different from the ritual procedures of the rite of passage, so there was no need to prepare separate manual. Lastly, unlike many other ‘military rites’, the opening and ending rites of war were only performed in times of emergency, so it may have been recognized that they could not be made regular. The rituals that Joseon established as national rituals were performed repeatedly at set period of times, making it possible to predict the cycle of implementation. From this perspective, we can consider the possibility that rituals that took place only in t he ideal state o f war were not considered rituals.
Abstract
War has always been a part of human history. The most critical difference between wartime and peacetime is whether murder is permissible. During war, acts that are taboo in civilized society, such as murder, are not only permitted but even encouraged. For this reason, from ancient times to modern times, there were few societies that did not perform any rituals when starting a war. Likewise, the transition from wartime to peacetime is equally important. This is because society can return to daily life by announcing that the abnormal state in which murder is encouraged has ended and returned to normal. From this perspective, the series of opening rituals that start a war and the ending rituals that conclude a war are one of the universal rituals of mankind. Traditionally, in Confucian society, it was considered an ideal to establish the country’s major rituals were classified and systematized into five kinds(Orye). Among them, the rituals of opening and ending the wars were generally placed as one of the ‘military rituals’. However, in the case of Joseon, in the process of establishing national rites according to the traditional Orye system, the rituals of opening and ending the wars were not included. Nevertheless, in the early Joseon Dynasty, the rituals of opening and ending the wars were often performed. In this study, we reviewed the cases of war opening and ending rituals implemented during the early Joseon Dynasty and estimated the reason why they were not established as national rituals even though they were implemented several times. First, Joseon’s military mobilization method, in which generals and soldiers started separately. It is important for the soldiers carrying out the war to participate in the ceremony for the opening of the war, which secures the legitimacy of the war and prays for victory. Therefore, there is a possibility that the opening ceremony could not have been regularized in a situation where generals and soldiers did not gather. Next, the war opening and closing rituals were conducted in a similar sequence to other rituals, ‘Gilye’. The various ceremonys performed during the war opening and closing rituals were not much different from the ritual procedures of the rite of passage, so there was no need to prepare separate manual. Lastly, unlike many other ‘military rites’, the opening and ending rites of war were only performed in times of emergency, so it may have been recognized that they could not be made regular. The rituals that Joseon established as national rituals were performed repeatedly at set period of times, making it possible to predict the cycle of implementation. From this perspective, we can consider the possibility that rituals that took place only in t he ideal state o f war were not considered rituals.
참고문헌 (33)
- 마틴 판 크레펠트, "전쟁 본능: 전쟁의 두 얼굴", pp.116~138 (2010), 살림
- 이범직, "韓國中世禮思想硏究", pp.167~ (1991), 일조각
- 이왕무, "조선왕실의 군사의례", pp.37~ (2019), 세창출판사
- 이규철, "정벌과 사대-15세기 조선의 대외정벌과 대명의식" (2022), 역사비평사
- 신진혜, "英祖代 凱旋 儀禮의 整備와 그 意義", 태동고전연구, 34, pp.7~41 (2015), 태동고전연구소
- 한국역사연구회 의례연구반, "조선시대 의례 연구의 현황과 지평의 확장" (2022), 민속원
- 한형주, "朝鮮初期 國家祭禮 硏究" (2002), 일조각
- 한정수, "고려시대 견장출정의(遣將出征儀) 및 사환의(師還儀)의 성립과정과 내용", 군사, (110), pp.165~202 (2019), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
- 정다함, "征伐이라는 戰爭", 征伐이라는 祭祀 - 世宗代 己亥年 “東征”과 婆猪江 “野人征伐”을 중심으로 -, 2013, pp.(52), 271~306[DOI]
- 계승범, "조선시대 해외파병과 한중관계" (2009), 푸른역사
- 김순남, "조선 成宗代 兀狄哈에 대하여", 조선시대사학보, (49), pp.35~63 (2009), 조선시대사학회
- 김순남, "조선 세조대 말엽의 정치적 추이", 역사와 실학, (60), pp.67~104 (2016), 역사실학회
- 김일환, "세종대 대마도정벌의 군사적 전개과정", 순천향 인문과학논총, 31(2), pp.92~139 (2012), 인문학연구소[DOI]
- 노영구, "세종의 전쟁수행과 리더십", 오늘의 동양사상, 19 (2008)
- 이규철, "세조대 모련위 정벌의 의미와 대명인식", 한국사연구, (158), pp.121~158 (2012), 한국사연구회
- 이규철, "세조대 건주위 정벌과 명의 출병 요청", 역사와 현실, (89), pp.259~295 (2013), 한국역사연구회
- 한성주, "조선 세조대 毛憐衛 征伐과 여진인의 從軍에 대하여", 江原史學, (23), pp.89~113 (2008), 강원사학회
- "明集禮 권33, 軍禮1 親征篇", ~
- "太祖實錄", ~
- "太宗實錄", ~
- 국방군사연구소, "왜구토벌사", pp.108~109 (1993), 국방군사연구소
- "世宗實錄", ~
- "成宗實錄", ~
- "世祖實錄", ~
- 허대영, "조선 초기 군사훈련의례와 병학", 박사, pp.2021
- 최상기, "신라 군제(軍制)에서의 군령권(軍令權) 인식과 행사", 역사와 현실, (122), pp.25~65 (2021), 한국역사연구회
- "憲宗純皇帝實錄 권200", ~
- "中宗實錄 권49", ~
- "宣祖實錄 권204", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 권40", ~
- 김경태, "임진왜란 직후,대일강화정책의 성격연구", 한국사연구, (138), pp.39~74 (2007), 한국사연구회
- 이태경, "正祖代 國行儀禮로서 厲祭의 설행과 守令 糾察", 한국문화, (94), pp.325~354 (2021), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 윤혜민, "조선시대 軍禮 연구의 현황과 과제", 조선시대사학보, (100), pp.371~409 (2022), 조선시대사학회
