들뢰즈 사유에서 본 장자의 언어철학
Zhuangzi's Language Philosophy from Deleuze's Thought
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Deleuze emphasizes the deterritorialization of language beyond general signification. This deterritorialization is a kind of linguistic stammering which stresses the continuous variation of language. He considers the linguistic stammering as chromatic linguistics that can create a lot of meanings, not a fixed meaning. Also, for Deleuze the elementary unit of language, the statement is the order-word. He insists the function of language is not to be informational and communicational, but to transmit an order-word. That is, language is made not to be believed but to be obeyed, and to compel obedience. In this sense, Deleuze underlines the power relations inherent in language. This can be called the politics of language. And Deleuze insists paradox that denies good senses and common senses. His paradox as singularity resists ordinary signification by moving between sense and nonsense. It opens the possibility of creating various meanings. Zhuangzi's language philosophy has three characteristics, which are the limitation and the negativity of language, linguistic paradox. According to Zhuangzi, world and all things always changes and are not fixed beings. But language fastens the changing world and things as only a meaning. So, language cannot express them entirely. That is the limitation of language that he says. Also, he says the negativity of language with constituted mind. His constituted mind leads humans to fill with prejudice and stubbornness, which brings human's wrong judgements. Thus, language full of constituted mind causes the distortion of values and operates as a kind of power. In spite of the limitation and the negativity, language must be used to express world and things, which is paradoxical situation. His paradox as a door create various possibilities of language. In this sense, chromatic linguistics, the politics of language, and paradox in Deleuze is similar to the limitation of language, the negativity of language, and paradox in Zhuangzi to some degree.
Abstract
Deleuze emphasizes the deterritorialization of language beyond general signification. This deterritorialization is a kind of linguistic stammering which stresses the continuous variation of language. He considers the linguistic stammering as chromatic linguistics that can create a lot of meanings, not a fixed meaning. Also, for Deleuze the elementary unit of language, the statement is the order-word. He insists the function of language is not to be informational and communicational, but to transmit an order-word. That is, language is made not to be believed but to be obeyed, and to compel obedience. In this sense, Deleuze underlines the power relations inherent in language. This can be called the politics of language. And Deleuze insists paradox that denies good senses and common senses. His paradox as singularity resists ordinary signification by moving between sense and nonsense. It opens the possibility of creating various meanings. Zhuangzi's language philosophy has three characteristics, which are the limitation and the negativity of language, linguistic paradox. According to Zhuangzi, world and all things always changes and are not fixed beings. But language fastens the changing world and things as only a meaning. So, language cannot express them entirely. That is the limitation of language that he says. Also, he says the negativity of language with constituted mind. His constituted mind leads humans to fill with prejudice and stubbornness, which brings human's wrong judgements. Thus, language full of constituted mind causes the distortion of values and operates as a kind of power. In spite of the limitation and the negativity, language must be used to express world and things, which is paradoxical situation. His paradox as a door create various possibilities of language. In this sense, chromatic linguistics, the politics of language, and paradox in Deleuze is similar to the limitation of language, the negativity of language, and paradox in Zhuangzi to some degree.
참고문헌 (21)
- 강신주, "장자 : 타자와의 소통과 주체의 변형" (2003), 태학사
- 곽경번, "壯者集釋" (1978), 中華書局
- 미셀 푸코, "광기의 역사", 나남출판사
- 벤자민 슈왈츠, "중국고대사상의 세계" (1996), 살림
- 이영철, "철학적 탐구" (2006), 책세상
- 이광세, "로티와 장자- 반표상주의, 다원주의 및 대화의 개념", 철학과 현실, (겨울) (1995)
- 이성희, "장자의 심미적 실재관" (2008), 한국학술정보
- 이진경, "노마디즘1" (2002), 휴머니스트
- 정용선, "장자의 해체적 사유" (2009), 사회평론
- 질 들뢰즈, "의미의 논리" (1999), 한길사
- 질 들뢰즈, "중첩" (2005), 동문선
- Bogue, Ronald, "Deleuze and Guattari" (1989), Routledge
- Bogue, Ronald, "Deleuze on Literature" (2003), Routledge
- Colebrook, Claire, "Gilles Deleuze" (2002), Routledge
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Essays Critical and Clinical" (1997), Minnesota UP
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Foucault" (1986), U of Minnesota P
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Negotiations: 1972-1990" (1995), Columbia UP
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia" (1987), Minnesota UP
- Deleuze, Gilles, "A Thousand Plateaus" (1987), Minnesota UP
- Goodchild, Philip, "Deleuze and Guattari: An Introduction to the Politics of Desire" (1996), SAGE
- Watson, Burton, "The Complete of Chuang-tzu" (1968), Comlumbia UP