본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중학교 과학 교과서에서 요구하는 수학 관련 과학 개념의 수준 및 학생들의 인지 수준 분석: 2015 개정 교육 과정의 화학과 생물을 중심으로

Analysis of the Level of Mathematical Concepts in Middle School Science Textbooks and Students' Cognitive Levels: Focused on Chemistry and Biology of the 2015 Revised Curriculum

강성주|양희선|조향래
과학교육연구소 (Science Education Research Institute)|2024.04|과학교육연구지 (Journal of Science Education)|제48권 제1호|pp. 15-30|DOI 10.21796/jse.2024.48.1.15

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

중학교 과학 교과서의 화학 및 생물 개념수학 연계 과학 내용학생들의 인지 수준chemistry and biology concepts in middle school science textbooksmathematics-integrated science contentstudents' cognitive levels

초록

본 연구는 학생들이 과학 개념을 이해하는 데 어려움을 겪고 학습을 회피하는 이유를 파악하기 위해 학생들의 인지 수준과 수학과 관련된 과학 개념이 요구하는 인지 수준을 분석했다. 먼저, 2015 개정 교육 과정의 수학 및 과학 교육 과정을 분석하여 중학교 과학 내용 중 수학과 연계된 부분의 학습 요소를 추출했으며, CAT (Curriculum Analysis Taxonomy)을 이용하여 학습 내용에서 요구되는 인지 수준을 분석했다. 화학의 경우, 수학과 관련된 총 20개의 학습 요소 중 12개가 초기 형식적 조작 수준(3A)의 이해가 필요하며, 3개가 후기 형식적 조작 수준(3B)의 이해가 필요했다. 3A와 3B에 해당하는 학습 요소들에는 비례 논리, 수리적 조작, 측정 기술에 관련된 사고 논리 유형이 많이 사용되는 것을 확인했다. 생물의 경우, 수학과 관련된 총 7개의 학습 요소 중 3개가 초기 형식적 조작 수준(3A)의 이해가 필요하며, 2개가 후기 형식적 조작 수준(3B)의 이해가 필요했다. 3A와 3B에 해당하는 생물 요소들은 상관 논리에 해당하는 학습 요소가 많이 포함되어 있어 학생들이 어려움을 겪을 수 있는 인지적 원인이 화학 영역과는 다소 차이가 있었다. 이는 GALT 축소본을 통해 분석된 형식적 사고가 가능한 중학교 학생의 평균 비율이 1학년의 경우 12.1%, 2학년의 경우 16.6%, 3학년의 경우 29.3%임을 고려할 때, 학생들의 인지 수준에 비추어 수학과 연계된 화학 및 생물 학습 내용에서 요구하는 인지 수준이 더 높다고 할 수 있다.

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze students' cognitive levels and the cognitive demands of mathematical concepts related to science to understand why students struggle to comprehend scientific concepts and tend to avoid learning them. Initially, the mathematics and science curricula of the 2015 revised curriculum were examined to extract learning elements related to mathematics within middle school science content. The Curriculum Analysis Taxonomy (CAT) was then employed to analyze the cognitive levels required by the learning content. In the domain of chemistry, among a total of 20 learning elements related to mathematics, 12 required an understanding at the level of initial formal manipulation (3A), while 3 necessitated comprehension at the level of later formal manipulation (3B). It was noted that cognitive logic types such as proportional reasoning, mathematical manipulation, and measurement skills were prominently employed in elements corresponding to both 3A and 3B. As for biology, out of 7 learning elements related to mathematics, 3 required an understanding at the level of initial formal manipulation (3A), and 2 necessitated comprehension at the level of later formal manipulation (3B). Elements corresponding to both 3A and 3B in biology predominantly involved correlational logic, indicating a somewhat different cognitive challenge compared to the domain of chemistry. Considering that the average percentage of middle school students capable of formal thinking, as analyzed through the GALT short form, was 12.1% for the first year, 16.6% for the second year, and 29.3% for the third year, it can be concluded that the cognitive demands of mathematics-related chemistry and biology learning content are relatively high compared to students' cognitive levels.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Ahn, S., "The Developmental Level of Logical Thinking of Middle School Students in Seoul-Comparison with the Contents of Middle School Science Textbooks based on Piaget's Intellectual Types-", Ewha Education Review, 1, pp.207~227 (1990)
  2. Bell, E. T., "The Queen of Science" (1931)
  3. Choi, B., "Analysis of Middle School Students' Cognitive Levels and Science Curriculum Contents", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 7(1), pp.19~32 (1987)
  4. Choi, K., "Use of Intellectual Resources between Mathematics and Science : An Empirical Study on Theoretical Models", Mathematics Education, 59(4), pp.405~420 (2020)
  5. Go, K., "A Study on the Relationship between Middle School Students' Cognitive Development Levels and the Level of Science Content in Biology Field in Science Textbooks", Master, pp.2003
  6. Kang, D., "Analysis of Mathematical Content Presented in Middle School Science Textbooks", New Physics, 70(1), pp.39~49 (2020)
  7. Kang, S., "Analysis of Cognitive Levels Required for Ion Bonded Compounds and Molecular Contents Described in Middle School Science 2 Textbooks(II)", Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 56(6), pp.739~750 (2012)
  8. Kang, S., "Cognitive Level of Students and Cognitive Demands of Curriculum Content in Science Teaching Strategies", Master, pp.2002
  9. Kang, S., "A Survey Study on the GALT Full and Abbreviated Versions Used in Science Education Research", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, pp.399~413 (1998)
  10. Kim, S., "Comparative Analysis of Content Levels in High School Chemistry II Textbooks according to Cognitive Levels of High School 1st Grade Students and Teachers' Perceptions", The Journal of Teacher Education, 25(4), pp.152~167 (2009)
  11. Kim, S. G., "Middle School Science 2" (2020), Mirae-N
  12. Kim, S. G., "Middle School Science 3" (2020), Mirae-N
  13. Kim, Y. M., "A Meta-analysis on the Logical Thinking Ability of Korean Middle-School Students-Meta-analysis of the researches between 1980 and 2000", Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 29(4), pp.437~449 (2009)
  14. Kwon, J., "An Analysis of the Cognitive Levels Required by the Biological Curriculum and the Relationship with the Cognitive Development Levels of Middle and High School Students according to the 7th Curriculum", Master, pp.2009
  15. Kwon, Y., "A Qualitative Case Study on the Learning Difficulties of Middle School Science Learning among Students with Low Mathematical Self-efficacy", Master, pp.2021
  16. Lee, K., "A Study on the Correlation Analysis of Middle and High School Biology Textbooks Using Piaget's Cognitive Development Theory- Focusing on the 7th Curriculum", Master, pp.2010
  17. Moon, H., "A Study on the Relationship between High School Students' Intellectual Development Levels and the Manipulation Levels Required by Chemistry Contents", Chemistry Education, 14(2), pp.116~127 (1987)
  18. Park, J., "Analysis of Cognitive Levels Required for State Changes and Molecular Motion Contents in 'Science 1' Middle School Textbooks(III)", Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 57(5), pp.640~655 (2013)
  19. Park, J., "A Study on Teaching Methods Considering the Level of Scientific Thinking Ability Required by Middle School Chemistry Concepts and Students' Cognitive Levels", Chemistry Education, 23(4), pp.267~278 (1997)
  20. Park, J., "Middle School Students' Cognitive Levels and Science Curriculum Analysis", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 7(1), pp.19~32 (1997)
  21. Prihastuti, I., "Teachers' Understanding about Cognitive Level on Science Test Items", Journal of Physics : Conference Series, 1157 (2019)
  22. Seo, B., "Analysis of the Trend of Mathematics Understanding Affecting Science Learning and the Linkage of Curriculum", Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 11(4), pp.677~694 (2008)
  23. Shayer, M., "Towards a science of science teaching: Cognitive development and curriculum demand" (1981), Heinemann
  24. Shin, D., "A Study on the Perception of Chemistry Curriculum among Science High School Students : An Analysis of Factors Affecting Mathematics and Science Achievement", Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 64(2), pp.119~129 (2020)
  25. Song, S., "Comparative Analysis of Content Levels in High School Chemistry II Textbooks according to Cognitive Levels of High School 3rd Grade Students", Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 49(1), pp.96~104 (2005)
  26. Yook, S., "A Study on the Correlation between Middle School Science and Mathematics Curricula", Master, pp.1997

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

2022 개정 중학교 과학과 교육과정과 과학교육표준(KSES)의 연관성 분석김민수, 정도준pp. 1-14TIMSS 2019 문제해결 및 탐구 과제에 대한 우리나라 초등학교 4학년 학생들의 학업성취 특성 분석권점례pp. 31-46알지오매스 기반 수업이 수학적 문제해결력 및 태도에 미치는 효과: 초등학교 5학년 ‘직육면체’ 단원을 중심으로이승동, 이종학pp. 47-62의미분석법에 의한 과학자 이미지 측정도구 개발 및 적용최혁준, 송영욱pp. 63-73
원문 보기