본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

How Much Is It Worth to Protect Sensitive Products with Tariff-Rate Quotas? -A Korean Case

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농업경제학

초록

The tariff-rate quota (TRQ) system is a hybrid import regime that conveys both tariff- and quota-like characteristics. Established by the tariffication process during the Uruguay Round, TRQs harmonize the needs for improved market access and protection from import surges. This paper aims to identify economic and policy consequences from TRQ implementation and to test whether the trade-off between formula tariff cuts and quota expansion is adequate and thus is beneficial to the protection of declared sensitive products. Using Korea’s case of soybean imports, this paper illuminates the importance of quota administration in terms of mark-ups, economic rents and the state-trading enterprises (STEs). Application of a one-product partial equilibrium model to Korea’s soybean market suggests that it would be better for Korea to designate soybeans as a category of sensitive products. The derived quota equivalents under the option of sensitive products turn out to be smaller than otherwise. Examination of quota equivalents for formula tariff cuts indicates different proportionality or trade-offs among options. Finally, it concludes with potential areas to improve the TRQ administration under the WTO modalities.

Abstract

The tariff-rate quota (TRQ) system is a hybrid import regime that conveys both tariff- and quota-like characteristics. Established by the tariffication process during the Uruguay Round, TRQs harmonize the needs for improved market access and protection from import surges. This paper aims to identify economic and policy consequences from TRQ implementation and to test whether the trade-off between formula tariff cuts and quota expansion is adequate and thus is beneficial to the protection of declared sensitive products. Using Korea’s case of soybean imports, this paper illuminates the importance of quota administration in terms of mark-ups, economic rents and the state-trading enterprises (STEs). Application of a one-product partial equilibrium model to Korea’s soybean market suggests that it would be better for Korea to designate soybeans as a category of sensitive products. The derived quota equivalents under the option of sensitive products turn out to be smaller than otherwise. Examination of quota equivalents for formula tariff cuts indicates different proportionality or trade-offs among options. Finally, it concludes with potential areas to improve the TRQ administration under the WTO modalities.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Abbott, C., "Wheat-Importing State Trading Enterprises: Impacts on the World Wheat Market", Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47, pp.119~136 (1999)
  2. Carbaugh, Robert, "International Economics. 13th Edition" (2010), South-Western College Pub
  3. de Gorter, H., "Reducing Tariffs Versus Expanding Tariff Rate Quotas, In Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda" (2006), Palgrave MacMillan and the World Bank
  4. A Graphical Analysis of the Functioning of Tariff Rate Quotas: Market Access and Welfare Effects for Exporting Countries, "Dupraz, C.", Trinity College, ~, pp.Trinity College Working Paper 07 (2007), 15
  5. Agricultural Trade Liberalization in the Uruguay Round: One Step Forward, One Step Back?, "Ingco, Merlinda", The World Bank, ~, pp.Policy Research Working Paper 1500 (1995)
  6. "Bringing Agriculture into GATT: The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, An Evaluation. Commissioned Paper No. 9" (1994)[URL]
  7. "Issues in Reforming Tariff-Rate Import Quotas in the Agreement on Agriculture in the WTO. Commissioned Paper No. 13" (2001)[URL]
  8. Josling, T., "Agriculture in the GATT" (1996), MacMillan
  9. Kerr, W., "Handbook on International Trade Policy" (2007), Edward Elgar Publishing Limited
  10. "Current Situations of TRQ Soybean Management", Policy Consultation Document, ~ (2012)
  11. Implications of the Doha Market Access Proposals for Developing Countries, "Laborde, D.", the World Bank, ~, pp.Policy Research Working Paper 5679 (2011)
  12. 임송수, "Korea’s Tariff Rate Quota System: Impact of the Doha Development Agenda Proposals", Journal of Korea Trade, 13(2), pp.1~19 (2009), 한국무역학회
  13. Potential Reform of Korea’s TRQ System, "Lim, S.S.", Department of Food & Resource Economics, Korea Univ, ~ (2010)
  14. Linda, Y., "Export Competition Disciplines in the Doha Round", Trade Policy Issues Paper #3, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, ~ (2005)
  15. Lo, Chang-fa, "State Trading Enterprises and Asia", Seminarial Paper Presented in Asian Center for WTO & International Health Law and Policy (2006)
  16. Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, "Major Statistics on Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries", ~ (2012)
  17. Monnich, C., "Tariff Rate Quotas: Does Administration Matter?", Discussion Paper No. 16, Center for International Development and Environmental Research, Univ. of Giessen, ~ (2003)
  18. Nogués, J., "Agricultural Exporters in a Protectionist World: Assessing Trade Strategies for the Mercosur", Paper prepared for the Trade and Integration Division of the Inter-American Development Bank (2003)
  19. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, "State Trading Enterprises in Agriculture", ~ (2001)
  20. Pan, S., "Assessing the impacts of the Chinese TRQ System and US Subsidies on the World Cotton Market", The Estey Centre J. of International Law and Trade Policy, 6(2), pp.251~273 (2005)
  21. Sharma, Ramesh, "On the Equivalence of Tariffs and Quotas for Sensitive Products in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations" (2006), Commodities and Trade Division, FAO
  22. Swinbank, Alan, "Dirty Tariffication Revisited: The EU and Sugar", The Estey Centre J. of International Law and Trade Policy, 5(1), pp.56~69 (2004)
  23. The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture: An evaluation, "The International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium", ~, pp.Commissioned paper Number 9 (1994)
  24. Woode, W., "Dictionary of Trade Policy Terms. 4th Edition" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  25. World Trade Organization, "Request for Waiver on Special Treatment for Rice of the Philippines", Council for Trade in Goods, G, W, pp.665, 2012[DOI]
  26. World Trade Organization, "Tariff Quota Administration Methods and Tariff Quota Fill", TN, S, pp.22, Committee on Agriculture, 2006[DOI]
  27. World Trade Organization, "Certification of Modifications and Rectifications: Schedule LX-Republic of Korea", WT, 492, pp.2005, ~
  28. World Trade Organization, "WTO Analytical Index: Guide to WTO Law and Practice" (2003), Cambridge Univ. Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)