조선표류일기를 통해본 19C 초 조선선비와 일본 무사의 시문 교류
On the Exchanging of Chinese Poems between Joseon Gentry and Japan Samurai in Joseon Drift Diary at Early 19C.
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There was a unique culture of exchanging Chinese poems in traditional East Asian societies. They exchanged Chinese poems not only among individuals in the same country, but also among individuals in other countries. However, Chinese poems exchanged between people from other countries were often made on a formal basis between the diplomatic envoys and their counterparts. However, the Joseon Drift Diary contains Chinese poems that a Japanese samurai, who had drifted by accident, shared with Joseon officials and scholars. An important feature of this data is that there are many Chinese poems that express extremely personal feelings. Although Joseon and Japan had different countries, they were able to write Chinese characters in common, so they were able to exchange their opinions, exchange Chinese poems, and communicate with each other. Japanese samurai and Joseon people recognized each other as people of the same culture who shared the same text. The poems they exchanged show Confucian and Taoist sentiments. On the other hand, however, they were wary of each other and caused conflicts. The Joseon people refused to teach the Japanese the sea route or the geographical names due to the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, and the Japanese samurai were angry at the contents of the Chinese poem, which Japan regarded as a descendant of Taebaek. Through the Joseon Drift Diary, a Japanese samurai named Yashuda was excellent enough to give a review of Chinese poems by the Joseon people, and Park Ki-soo, president of Dongnae, also highly praised the poems of Yasuda at the time. It is necessary to study how the mid or low level samurai in Japan came to have such a Chinese wring ability.
Abstract
There was a unique culture of exchanging Chinese poems in traditional East Asian societies. They exchanged Chinese poems not only among individuals in the same country, but also among individuals in other countries. However, Chinese poems exchanged between people from other countries were often made on a formal basis between the diplomatic envoys and their counterparts. However, the Joseon Drift Diary contains Chinese poems that a Japanese samurai, who had drifted by accident, shared with Joseon officials and scholars. An important feature of this data is that there are many Chinese poems that express extremely personal feelings. Although Joseon and Japan had different countries, they were able to write Chinese characters in common, so they were able to exchange their opinions, exchange Chinese poems, and communicate with each other. Japanese samurai and Joseon people recognized each other as people of the same culture who shared the same text. The poems they exchanged show Confucian and Taoist sentiments. On the other hand, however, they were wary of each other and caused conflicts. The Joseon people refused to teach the Japanese the sea route or the geographical names due to the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, and the Japanese samurai were angry at the contents of the Chinese poem, which Japan regarded as a descendant of Taebaek. Through the Joseon Drift Diary, a Japanese samurai named Yashuda was excellent enough to give a review of Chinese poems by the Joseon people, and Park Ki-soo, president of Dongnae, also highly praised the poems of Yasuda at the time. It is necessary to study how the mid or low level samurai in Japan came to have such a Chinese wring ability.
참고문헌 (46)
- "詩經", ~
- "史記", ~
- "論語", ~
- "帝王韻紀", ~
- "高麗史", ~
- "東文選", ~
- "文選", ~
- "古文眞寶", ~
- "資治通鑑", ~
- "太平御覽", ~
- "해동역사", ~
- "조선왕조실록", ~
- "승정원일기", ~
- "충청도병영장계등록", ~
- "한국문집총간", ~
- "朝鮮漂流日記", ~
- 町內遺跡Ⅰ, "高原町敎育委員會", ~, pp.宮崎縣 西諸縣郡 高原町文化財調査報告書8 (2001)
- 김강일, "전 근대 한국의 海難救助와 漂流民 구조 시스템", 동북아역사논총, (28), pp.7~57 (2010), 동북아역사재단
- 김한규, "동아시아의 창화외교", pp.450~469 (2019), 소나무
- 鹿児島圖書館, "諸家大槪", pp.7~ (1966)
- 梅家玲, "漢魏六朝文學新論—擬代與贈答篇", pp.101~ (2004), 北京大學出版社
- 문경호, "<<朝鮮漂流日記>>의 사료적 가치와 활용방안", 진단학보, (135), pp.227~257 (2020), 진단학회
- 박광명, "기자조선에 대한 인식의 변천-고려부터 한말까지 사서를 중심으로", 한국사론, 6, pp.251~296 (1980), 서울대학교 국사학과
- 박훈, "明治維新과 ‘士大夫的 정치문화’의 도전: ‘近世’1) 동아시아 정치사의 모색", 역사학보, (218), pp.411~444 (2013), 역사학회
- 박대재, "箕子朝鮮과 小中華", 韓國史學報, (65), pp.7~49 (2016), 고려사학회[DOI]
- 시마다 겐지, "주자학과 양명학", pp.122~ (1977), 까치
- 신종대, "무사의 이름체계 연구 - 메이지시대 전후, 무사의 실명과 통칭을 중심으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(54), pp.111~127 (2018), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 심민정, "『朝鮮漂流日記』(1819)에 나타난표류왜인 호송과 접대 실태", 한일관계사연구, (70), pp.127~156 (2020), 한일관계사학회[DOI]
- 윤영숙, "일본 무사와 조선 지방관리의 交流 -야스다와 윤영규를 중심으로-", 동북아 문화연구, 1(66), pp.57~71 (2021), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 이근우, "『조선표류일기』의 회화자료에 대하여", 동북아역사논총, (64), pp.239~258 (2019), 동북아역사재단[DOI]
- 이근우, "조선표류일기", pp.141~142 (2020), 소명출판
- 이근우, "『조선표류일기』의 회화자료와 비인현감 윤영규", 한일관계사연구, (73), pp.181~224 (2021), 한일관계사학회[DOI]
- 이장희, "朝鮮時代 선비硏究", pp.11~ (2007), 博英社
- 이익주, "14세기 후반 동아시아 국제질서의 변화와 고려-원", 명-일본 관계, 2012, pp.(114), 13~41[DOI]
- 이용수, "도쿠가와(德川) 시대 前期 儒學의 佛敎 비판", 한국철학논집, (24), pp.307~346 (2008), 한국철학사연구회[DOI]
- 이윤정, "『조선표류일기』속 상급 관리들의 복식 양상", 동북아 문화연구, 1(65), pp.103~132 (2020), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 이종묵, "한시의 보편적 가치와 조선후기 중국 문인과의 시문 교류", 한국시가연구, 30, pp.35~64 (2011), 한국시가학회[DOI]
- 이호윤, "19세기 일본의 대외위기와 사상적 반응‒아이자와 야스시의 『신론』을 중심으로‒", 일본근대학연구, (65), pp.141~156 (2019), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
- 장순순, "18세기 조선 지식인의 對日談論으로서 울릉도･독도", 한일관계사연구, (51), pp.137~180 (2015), 한일관계사학회
- 장진성, "朝鮮時代 繪畵와 동아시아적 시각", 동악미술사학, (21), pp.119~147 (2017), 동악미술사학회[DOI]
- 정옥자, "조선후기 조선중화사상 연구", pp.17~19 (1998), 일지사
- 정형우, "오경ㆍ사서대전의 수입 및 그 간판 광포", 동방학지, 63, pp.5~7 (1989), 연세대학교 국학연구원
- 허경진, "하야시 라잔(林羅山)의 창수시를 통해 본 한일문사 초기교류의 양상", 동악어문학, (53), pp.171~196 (2009), 동악어문학회
- 池內 敏, "薩摩藩士朝鮮漂流日記" (2009)
- 이케우치 사토시, "1819年 忠清道に漂着した日本船の漂流記", 동아시아문화연구, (45), pp.79~102 (2009), 동아시아문화연구소[DOI]
- 沖田行司, "藩校敎育の形成と展開 : 島津斉彬の政治と敎育", 人文學, 136 (1981), 同志社大學