Impact of Captive Supply on Cash Price in the U.S. Cattle Procurement Market: A Dynamic Modeling Approach
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the impact of captive market supply on cash market price in the U.S. cattle procurement market with consideration of dynamic interactions between captive and cash markets. Both conceptual and empirical analyses explore advantages of dynamic models over static models by focusing on the temporal change in the ratio of captive purchase to packers' total procurement and discount factor. Empirical models were estimated using the Kalman filter procedure with three alternative cost functions: generalized Leontief, translog, and quadratic functions. Dynamic estimation results found a statistically significant and negative relationship between captive market quantity and cash market prices from all functional forms of cost function. However, results of static models showed that the captive market quantity - cash market price relationship was sensitive to functional forms of cost function. Findings from our empirical analysis suggest that dynamic models could be more appropriate than static models in examining the impact of captive supply on cash price in the cattle procurement market.
Abstract
This paper examines the impact of captive market supply on cash market price in the U.S. cattle procurement market with consideration of dynamic interactions between captive and cash markets. Both conceptual and empirical analyses explore advantages of dynamic models over static models by focusing on the temporal change in the ratio of captive purchase to packers' total procurement and discount factor. Empirical models were estimated using the Kalman filter procedure with three alternative cost functions: generalized Leontief, translog, and quadratic functions. Dynamic estimation results found a statistically significant and negative relationship between captive market quantity and cash market prices from all functional forms of cost function. However, results of static models showed that the captive market quantity - cash market price relationship was sensitive to functional forms of cost function. Findings from our empirical analysis suggest that dynamic models could be more appropriate than static models in examining the impact of captive supply on cash price in the cattle procurement market.
참고문헌 (33)
- Adilov, N, "Bilateral forward contracts and spot prices", The Energy Journal, 31(3), pp.67~81 (2010)[DOI]
- Allaz, B, "Cournot competition, forward markets and efficiency", Journal of Economic theory, 59(1), pp.1~16 (1993)[DOI]
- Azzam, A. M, "Measuring market power and cost‐efficiency effects of industrial concentration", The Journal of Industrial Economics, 45(4), pp.377~386 (1997)[DOI]
- Azzam, A, "Captive supplies, market conduct, and the open-market price", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), pp.76~83 (1998)[DOI]
- Corts, K. S, "Conduct parameters and the measurement of market power", Journal of Econometrics, 88(2), pp.227~250 (1999)[DOI]
- Crespi, J. M, "Competition in US farm product markets: Do long‐run incentives trump short‐run market power?", Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 34(4), pp.669~695 (2012)[DOI]
- Dockner, E. J, "A dynamic theory of conjectural variations", The Journal of Industrial Economics, pp.377~395 (1992)
- Elam, E, "Cash forward contracting versus hedging of fed cattle, and the impact of cash contracting on cash prices", Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, pp.205~217 (1992)
- Hayenga, M, "Competition for Fed Cattle in Colorado vs. Other Areas: The Impact of the Decline in Packers and Ascent in Contracting", Paper presented at the Proceedings of the NCR Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management (1990)
- Hayenga, M. O. B., Dan, "Packer Competition, Forward Contracting Price Impacts, and the Relevant Market for Fed Cattle", Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, pp.1991
- "Senators Revise Cattle Price Discovery and Transparency Act" (2022)[URL]
- Kalman, R. E, "A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems", J. Basic Engineering, Transactions ASMA, Series D, 82, pp.35~45 (1960)[DOI]
- Karp, L. S, "A dynamic model of oligopoly in the coffee export market", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(2), pp.448~457 (1993)[DOI]
- Karp, L. S, "Open-loop and feedback models of dynamic oligopoly", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 11(3), pp.369~389 (1993)[DOI]
- Katchova, A. L, "A dynamic model of oligopoly and oligopsony in the US potato‐processing industry", Agribusiness, 21(3), pp.409~428 (2005)[DOI]
- Kutlu, L, "Estimation of market power in the presence of firm level inefficiencies", Journal of Econometrics, 168(1), pp.141~155 (2012)[DOI]
- Love, H. A, "A Strategic Rationale for Captive Supplies", Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 24(1), pp.1~18 (1999)
- Rhudy, M. B, "A kalman filtering tutorial for undergraduate students", International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Survey, 8(1), pp.1~18 (2017)[DOI]
- Schroeder, T. C, "The impact of forward contracting on fed cattle transaction prices", Review of Agricultural Economics, 15(2), pp.325~337 (1993)[DOI]
- Schroeter, J. R, "Econometric Analysis of Fed Cattle Procurement in the Texas Panhandle" (1999)
- Schroeter, J. R, "Captive supplies and the spot market price of fed cattle: The plant‐level relationship", Agribusiness : An International Journal, 19(4), pp.489~504 (2003)[DOI]
- Schroeter, J. R, "Captive supplies and cash market prices for fed cattle : The role of delivery timing incentives", Agribusiness : An International Journal, 20(3), pp.347~362 (2004)[DOI]
- Slade, M. E, "Empirical games: the oligopoly case", Canadian Journal of Economics, pp.368~402 (1995)
- "Livestock Slaughter Annual Summary"[URL]
- National Direct Slaughter Cattle Reports, "U.S. Department of Agriculture", ~
- Concentration in agriculture: a report of the USDA Advisory Committee on Agricultural Concentration, "U.S. Department of Agriculture", ~ (1996)
- COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING: Purpose, Use, Impact, and Regulation of Cattle Futures Markets, "U.S. General Accounting Office", ~, pp.RCED-88-30 (1987)
- Ward, C. E, "Inter‐Firm Differences in Fed Cattle Prices in the Southern Plains", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(2), pp.480~485 (1992)[DOI]
- Ward, C. E, "Short-run captive supply relationships with fed cattle transaction prices" (1996), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration
- Ward, C. E, "Impacts from captive supplies on fed cattle transaction prices", Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, pp.494~514 (1998)
- Wohlgenant, M. K, "Competition in the US Meatpacking Industry", Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ, 5(1), pp.1~12 (2013)[DOI]
- Zhang, M, "Captive supplies and the cash market price: a spatial markets approach", Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 25, pp.88~108 (2000)