PANAS를 사용한 사상체질별 심리 특성 연구
Psychological Analysis of Sasang Types using PANAS
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study was to examine the positive and negative affect related to psychological characteristics of each Sasang types using Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) with 78 students from School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University. After determining the Sasang types by QSCC Ⅱ, the psychological characteristics of each Sasang types were analysed by PANAS. We did ANOVA analysis with eight related scales and found significant differences between the Tae-Eum type (18.71±8.75, 6.47±3.36, 6.31±2.47, 3.18±2.77, 10.94±10.08) and the So-Eum type (13.38±6.03, 4.55±2.23, 4.19±2.16, 5.81±4.20, 1.83±9.17, respectively) in Positive Affect (PA) (F=3.931, p=0.024), PA-Joy (F=3.991, p=0.023), PA-Interest (F=5.025, p=0.009), NA-Afraid (F=3.118, p=0.050), and Difference between Positive and Negative Affect (DPN) (F=6.355, p=0.003) scores. The post-hoc analysis showed that the Tae-Eum type (18.71±8.75, 6.47±3.36, 6.31±2.47, 10.94±10.08) has significantly higher score than So-Eum type (13.38±6.03, 4.55±2.23, 4.19±2.16, 1.83±9.17, respectively) in PA (p=0.018), PA-Joy (p=0.021), PA-Interest (p=0.017), and DPN (p=0.002) scores. The So-Eum type (5.81±4.20) showed significantly (p=0.047) higher score than the Tae-Eum type (3.18±2.77) in NA-Afraid. Results demonstrated distinct affect profile differences between Tae-Eum and So-Eum Sasang types using PANAS. This study may serve as the foundation in identifying psychological traits of Sasang types, especially regarding the aspect of affect.
Abstract
This study was to examine the positive and negative affect related to psychological characteristics of each Sasang types using Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) with 78 students from School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University. After determining the Sasang types by QSCC Ⅱ, the psychological characteristics of each Sasang types were analysed by PANAS. We did ANOVA analysis with eight related scales and found significant differences between the Tae-Eum type (18.71±8.75, 6.47±3.36, 6.31±2.47, 3.18±2.77, 10.94±10.08) and the So-Eum type (13.38±6.03, 4.55±2.23, 4.19±2.16, 5.81±4.20, 1.83±9.17, respectively) in Positive Affect (PA) (F=3.931, p=0.024), PA-Joy (F=3.991, p=0.023), PA-Interest (F=5.025, p=0.009), NA-Afraid (F=3.118, p=0.050), and Difference between Positive and Negative Affect (DPN) (F=6.355, p=0.003) scores. The post-hoc analysis showed that the Tae-Eum type (18.71±8.75, 6.47±3.36, 6.31±2.47, 10.94±10.08) has significantly higher score than So-Eum type (13.38±6.03, 4.55±2.23, 4.19±2.16, 1.83±9.17, respectively) in PA (p=0.018), PA-Joy (p=0.021), PA-Interest (p=0.017), and DPN (p=0.002) scores. The So-Eum type (5.81±4.20) showed significantly (p=0.047) higher score than the Tae-Eum type (3.18±2.77) in NA-Afraid. Results demonstrated distinct affect profile differences between Tae-Eum and So-Eum Sasang types using PANAS. This study may serve as the foundation in identifying psychological traits of Sasang types, especially regarding the aspect of affect.
참고문헌 (27)
- 채 한, "정신생리:전국한의과대학 생리학 교수 편. 동의생리학", pp.421~ (2008), 집문당
- 김만산, "주역(周易)의 관점에서 본 사상의학원리(2)-四端論에 관하여", 동서철학연구, 20(1), pp.152~176 (2000)
- 황민우, "동무 이제마의 심욕과 성정에 관한 고찰", 사상체질의학회지, 16(2), pp.17~31 (2004)
- Lane, R.D., "Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion", pp.373~ (2000), Oxford University Press
- 홍원식, "정교황제내경", pp.35~ (1981), 동양의학연구원출판부
- Kim, J.W., "Clinical Study on Personality Characteristics of the Alcoholic Patients-with MMPI & Sasang Constitution", J Orient Neuropsychiatry, 3, pp.65~85 (1992)
- Chae, H., "An Alternative Way to Individualized Medicine: Psychological and Physical Traits of Sasang Typology", J Altern Complement Med, 9(4), pp.519~528 (2003)
- 조용태, "사상체질분류검사의 준거타당화 연구(성격요인(16PF), 성격유형검사(MBTI)와의 비교분석)", 사상의학회지, 6(1), pp.21~39 (1994)
- 서 웅, "Beck 우울척도, 상태-특성 불안척도를 이용한 四象人의 심리특성에 대한 연구", 사상체질의학회지, 12(1), pp.136~143 (2000)
- Park, S.H., "Temperament and Character Profiles of Sasang Typology in an Adult Clinical Sample", eCAM Advance Access (2009)[DOI]
- 채한, "사상 유형학의 성격심리학적 고찰", 대한한의학회지, 25(2), pp.151~164 (2004), 대한한의학회
- Chae, H., "Psychological profile of sasang typology: A systematic review", Evidence-Based Complementary And Alternative Medicine, 6(1), pp.21~29 (2009)
- 채한, "SCL-90-R을 사용한 사상체질별 심리정신 특성 연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 24(4), pp.722~726 (2010), 대한동의병리학회
- 백상용, "동무 이제마의 의학사상에 대한 연구", 대한한의학원전학회지, 13(1), pp.117~145 (2000)
- Watson, D., "Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales", J Pers Soc Psychol, 54(6), pp.1063~1070 (1988)
- Harmon-Jones, E., "PANAS Positive Activation is Associated with Anger", Emotion, 9(2), pp.183~196 (2009)
- Egloff, B., "Facets of Dynamic Positive Affect: Differentiating Joy, Interest, and Activation in the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS)", J Pers Soc Psychol, 85(3), pp.528~540 (2003)
- 최선미, "QSCCⅡ와 MBTI의 비교분석을 통한 사상체질의 성격유형 연구", 한국한의학연구원논문집, 6(1), pp.47~57 (2000)
- 권모란, "간이정신진간검사(SCL-90-R)와 사상체질분류검사지(QSCCII)를 이용한 유방암 환자에서의 부적응 증상 연구", 석사, 보건스포츠대학원 대체의학과, pp.2006
- 민성길, "사상체질론의 정신의학적 타당성에 대한 연구", 신경정신의학, 40(3), pp.396~406 (2001), 대한신경정신의학회
- 이유정, "성격 특질이 기분의 수준 및 변화성에 미치는 영향", 박사, pp.1994
- 이현희, "한국판 정적 정서 및 부정 정서 척도의 타당화 연구", 한국심리학회지, 22(4), pp.935~946 (2003)
- 김명근, "애노희락의 심리학", pp.23~ (2003), 개마고원
- 송일병, "이제마 철학의 학문적 배경과 사상의학의 성립에 대한 고찰", 사상의학회지, 3(1), pp.1~8 (1991)
- Chiappelli, F., "Evidence-Based Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine I: History", eCAM, 2, pp.453~458 (2005)
- 임진희, "중년비만여성의 사상체질별 특성에 관한 연구", 사상체질의학회지, 16, pp.59~69 (2004)
- 송민선, "QSCCⅡ, MBTI, STAI를 통해 파악한 四象體質別 心理的 特性에 관한 연구 -體質別 養生法 硏究의 基礎 硏究로써-", 대한예방한의학회지, 13(2), pp.65~76 (2009), 대한예방한의학회