Robotic Surgery for Cervical Cancer
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The development of robotic technology has facilitated the application of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment and evaluation of patients with early, advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer. The application of robotic technology for selected patients with cervical cancer and the data available in the literature are addressed in the present review paper. The robotic radical hysterectomy technique developed at the Mayo Clinic Arizona is presented with data comparing 27 patients who underwent the robotic procedure with 2 matched groups of patients treated by laparoscopic (N=31), and laparotomic radical hysterectomy (N=35). A few other studies confirmed the feasibility and safety of robotic radical hysterectomy and comparisons to either to the laparoscopic or open approach were discussed. Based on data from the literature, minimally invasive techniques including laparoscopy and robotics are preferable to laparotomy for patients requiring radical hysterectomy, with some advantages noted for robotics over laparoscopy. A prospective randomised trial is currently being perfomred under the auspices of the American Association of Gyneoclogic Laparoscopists comparing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (laparoscopy or robotics) with laparotomy. For early cervical cancer radical parametrectomy and fertility preserving trachelectomy have been performed using robotic technology and been shown to be feasible, safe, and easier to perform when compared to the laparoscopic approach. Similar benefits have been noted in the treatment of advanced and recurrent cervical cancer where complex procedures such as extraperitoneal paraortic lymphadenectomy and pelvic exenteration have been required. Conclusion: Robotic technology better facilitates the surgical approach as compared to laparoscopy for technically challenging operations performed to treat primary, early or advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer. Although patient advantages are similar or slightly improved with robotics, there are multiple advantages for surgeons.
Abstract
The development of robotic technology has facilitated the application of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment and evaluation of patients with early, advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer. The application of robotic technology for selected patients with cervical cancer and the data available in the literature are addressed in the present review paper. The robotic radical hysterectomy technique developed at the Mayo Clinic Arizona is presented with data comparing 27 patients who underwent the robotic procedure with 2 matched groups of patients treated by laparoscopic (N=31), and laparotomic radical hysterectomy (N=35). A few other studies confirmed the feasibility and safety of robotic radical hysterectomy and comparisons to either to the laparoscopic or open approach were discussed. Based on data from the literature, minimally invasive techniques including laparoscopy and robotics are preferable to laparotomy for patients requiring radical hysterectomy, with some advantages noted for robotics over laparoscopy. A prospective randomised trial is currently being perfomred under the auspices of the American Association of Gyneoclogic Laparoscopists comparing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (laparoscopy or robotics) with laparotomy. For early cervical cancer radical parametrectomy and fertility preserving trachelectomy have been performed using robotic technology and been shown to be feasible, safe, and easier to perform when compared to the laparoscopic approach. Similar benefits have been noted in the treatment of advanced and recurrent cervical cancer where complex procedures such as extraperitoneal paraortic lymphadenectomy and pelvic exenteration have been required. Conclusion: Robotic technology better facilitates the surgical approach as compared to laparoscopy for technically challenging operations performed to treat primary, early or advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer. Although patient advantages are similar or slightly improved with robotics, there are multiple advantages for surgeons.
참고문헌 (51)
- Magrina JF, "Robotic surgery in gynecology", Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 28, pp.77~82 (2007)
- Frumovitz M, "Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer", Obstet Gynecol, 110, pp.96~102 (2007)
- Puntambekar SP, "Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 14, pp.682~689 (2007)
- Holloway RW, "Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer", Obstet Gynecol, 110, pp.1174~1175 (2007)
- Zakashansky K, "Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 15, pp.387~388 (2008)
- Obermair A, "A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 15, pp.584~588 (2008)
- Magrina JF, "Robotic radical hysterectomy: technical aspects" (2008), Gynecol Oncol
- Symmonds RE, "Some surgical aspects of gynecologic cancer", Cancer, 36, pp.649~660 (1975)
- Sert BM, "Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection- case report", Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 27, pp.531~533 (2006)
- Sert B, "Robotic radical hysterectomy in early- stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?", Int J Med Robot, 3, pp.224~228 (2007)
- Kim YT, "Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study", Gynecol Oncol, 108, pp.312~316 (2008)
- Fanning J, "Robotic radical hysterectomy", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 198, pp.649~ (2008)
- Nezhat FR, "Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer", JSLS, 12, pp.227~237 (2008)
- Boggess JF, "A case-control study of robot- assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 199, pp.357~ (2008)
- Magrina JF, "Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy", Gynecol Oncol, 109, pp.86~91 (2008)
- Magrina JF, "Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for endometrial cancer: morbidity and survival", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 181, pp.376~381 (1999)
- Magrina JF, "Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer", Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 17, pp.343~346 (2005)
- Magrina JF, "Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: five-year recurrence and survival rates", Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 25, pp.439~441 (2004)
- Nezhat F, "Analysis of survival after laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 15, pp.181~187 (2008)
- Kehoe SM, "Innovative laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology", Curr Oncol Rep, 9, pp.472~477 (2007)
- Holloway RW, "Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer", Obstet Gynecol, 110, pp.1174~1175 (2007)
- Hewett PJ, "Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial", Ann Surg, 248, pp.728~738 (2008)
- Nezhat F, "Laparoscopic radical parametrectomy and partial vaginectomy for recurrent endometrial cancer", Gynecol Oncol, 104, pp.494~496 (2007)
- Liang Z, "Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy or parametrectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for cervical or vaginal stump carcinoma: report of six cases", Int J Gynecol Cancer, 16, pp.1713~1716 (2006)
- Lee CL, "Total laparoscopic radical parametrectomy", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 12, pp.168~170 (2005)
- Ramirez PT, "Robotic radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with invasive cervical cancer", Gynecol Oncol, 111, pp.18~21 (2008)
- Shepherd JH, "Radical vaginal trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer-cumulative pregnancy rate in a series of 123 women", BJOG, 113, pp.719~724 (2006)
- Diaz JP, "Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma", Gynecol Oncol, 111, pp.255~260 (2008)
- Einstein MH, "Radical vaginal versus abdominal trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: A comparison of surgical and pathologic outcomes" (2008), Gynecol Oncol
- Beiner ME, "Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case-control study", Gynecol Oncol, 110, pp.168~171 (2008)
- "Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)", 2005, 56~60
- Marchiole P, "Oncological safety of laparoscopic- assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LARVT or Dargent's operation): a comparative study with laparoscopic- assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH)", Gynecol Oncol, 106, pp.132~141 (2007)
- Chen Y, "A fertility-preserving option in early cervical carcinoma: laparoscopy-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 136, pp.90~93 (2008)
- Díaz-Feijoo B, "Total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy with intraoperative sentinel node identification for early cervical stump cancer", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 12, pp.522~524 (2005)
- Persson J, "Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy" (2008), Gynecol Oncol
- Geisler JP, "Robotically assisted total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for fertility sparing in stage IB1 adenosarcoma of the cervix", J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 18, pp.727~729 (2008)
- Kehoe SM, "Transperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers", Curr Treat Options Oncol, 7, pp.93~101 (2006)
- Marnitz S, "Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer?", Gynecol Oncol, 99, pp.536~544 (2005)
- Papadia A, "Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology", J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 11, pp.297~306 (2004)
- DeNardis SA, "Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer", Gynecol Oncol, 111, pp.412~417 (2008)
- Querleu D, "Extraperitoneal endosurgical aortic and common iliac dissection in the staging of bulky or advanced cervical carcinomas", Cancer, 88, pp.1883~1891 (2000)
- Burnett AF, "Extraperitoneal laparoscopic lymph node staging: the University of Southern California experience", Gynecol Oncol, 95, pp.189~192 (2004)
- Tillmanns T, "Safety, feasibility, and costs of outpatient laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic nodal dissection for locally advanced cervical carcinoma", Gynecol Oncol, 106, pp.370~374 (2007)
- Gil-Moreno A, "Usefulness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for lymph node recurrence in gynecologic malignancy", Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 87, pp.723~730 (2008)
- Vergote I, "Robotic retroperitoneal lower paraaortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: first report on the technique used in 5 patients", Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 87, pp.783~787 (2008)
- Magrina JF, "Extraperitoneal infrarenal aortic lymphadenectomy: development of a technique" (2008), Gynecol Oncol
- Chiva LM, "Surgical treatment of recurrent cervical cancer: state of the art and new achievements", Gynecol Oncol, 110(3), pp.S60~S66 (2008)
- Pectasides D, "Chemotherapy for recurrent cervical cancer", Cancer Treat Rev, 34, pp.603~613 (2008)
- Elst P, "Management of recurrent cervical cancer. Review of the literature and case report", Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 28, pp.435~441 (2007)
- Leblanc F, "Pretherapeutic laparoscopic staging of locally advanced cervical carcinomas: technique and results", Gynecol Oncol, 99(3), pp.S157~S158 (2005)
- Pruthi RS, "Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration for bladder cancer in the female patient", J Endourol, 22, pp.2397~2402 (2008)