Genetic relationship between purebred and synthetic pigs for growth performance using single step method
3
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the genetic correlation (<i>r</i><sub>pc</sub>) of growth performance between purebred (Duroc and Korean native) and synthetic (WooriHeukDon) pigs using a single-step method.Methods: Phenotypes of 15,902 pigs with genotyped data from 1,792 pigs from a nucleus farm were used for this study. We estimated the <i>r</i><sub>pc</sub> of several performance traits between WooriHeukDon and purebred pigs: day of target weight (DAY), backfat thickness (BF), feed conversion rate (FCR), and residual feed intake (RFI). The variances and covariances of the studied traits were estimated by an animal multi-trait model that applied the Bayesian inference.Results: <i>r</i><sub>pc</sub> within traits was lower than 0.1 for DAY and BF, but high for FCR and RFI; in particular, <i>r</i><sub>pc</sub> for RFI between Duroc and WooriHeukDon pigs was nearly 1. Comparison between different traits revealed that RFI in Duroc pigs was associated with different traits in WooriHeukDon pigs. However, the most of <i>r</i><sub>pc</sub> between different traits were estimated with low or with high standard deviation.Conclusion: The results indicated that there were substantial differences in <i>r</i><sub>pc</sub> of traits in the synthetic WooriHeukDon pigs, which could be caused by these pigs having a more complex origin than other crossbred pigs. RFI was strongly correlated between Duroc and WooriHeukDon pigs, and these breeds might have similar single nucleotide polymorphism effects that control RFI. RFI is more essential for metabolism than other growth traits and these metabolic characteristics in purebred pigs, such as nutrient utilization, could significantly affect those in synthetic pigs. The findings of this study can be used to elucidate the genetic architecture of crossbred pigs and help develop new breeds with target traits.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the genetic correlation (rpc) of growth performance between purebred (Duroc and Korean native) and synthetic (WooriHeukDon) pigs using a single-step method. Methods: Phenotypes of 15,902 pigs with genotyped data from 1,792 pigs from a nucleus farm were used for this study. We estimated the rpc of several performance traits between WooriHeukDon and purebred pigs: day of target weight (DAY), backfat thickness (BF), feed conversion rate (FCR), and residual feed intake (RFI). The variances and covariances of the studied traits were estimated by an animal multi-trait model that applied the Bayesian inference. Results: rpc within traits was lower than 0.1 for DAY and BF, but high for FCR and RFI; in particular, rpc for RFI between Duroc and WooriHeukDon pigs was nearly 1. Comparison between different traits revealed that RFI in Duroc pigs was associated with different traits in WooriHeukDon pigs. However, the most of rpc between different traits were estimated with low or with high standard deviation. Conclusion: The results indicated that there were substantial differences in rpc of traits in the synthetic WooriHeukDon pigs, which could be caused by these pigs having a more complex origin than other crossbred pigs. RFI was strongly correlated between Duroc and WooriHeukDon pigs, and these breeds might have similar single nucleotide polymorphism effects that control RFI. RFI is more essential for metabolism than other growth traits and these metabolic characteristics in purebred pigs, such as nutrient utilization, could significantly affect those in synthetic pigs. The findings of this study can be used to elucidate the genetic architecture of crossbred pigs and help develop new breeds with target traits.
참고문헌 (42)
- Wientjes YCJ, "Board invited review : the purebredcrossbred correlation in pigs : a review of theory, estimates, and implications", J Anim Sci, 95, pp.3467~3478 (2017)[DOI]
- Juarez M, "Meat quality of tenderloin from Iberian pigs as affected by breed strain and crossbreeding", Meat Sci, 81, pp.573~579 (2009)[DOI]
- Wei M, "Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information", Anim Sci, 59, pp.401~413 (1994)[DOI]
- Bijma P, "Maximizing genetic gain for the sire line of a crossbreeding scheme utilizing both purebred and crossbred information", Anim Sci, 66, pp.529~542 (1998)[DOI]
- Tusell L, "Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminalcross model", Genet Sel Evol, 48, pp.32~ (2016)[DOI]
- Habier D, "Estimation of genetic parameters on test stations using purebred and crossbred progeny of sires of the Bavarian Piétrain", Livest Sci, 107, pp.142~151 (2007)[DOI]
- Edea Z, "Detecting selection signatures between Duroc and Duroc synthetic pig populations using high-density SNP chip", Anim Genet, 48, pp.473~477 (2017)[DOI]
- Gilbert H, "Review : divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig", Animal, 11, pp.1427~1439 (2017)[DOI]
- A. J. Harris, "Improved nutrient digestibility and retention partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected for low residual feed intake1", Journal of Animal Science, 90(suppl_4), pp.164~166 (2012), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Sargolzaei M, "CFC: a tool for monitoring genetic diversity", 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (2006)
- 최재관, "Genetic Parameter Estimation in Seedstock Swine Population for Growth Performances", Animal Bioscience, 26(4), pp.470~475 (2013), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- Cai W, "Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine", J Anim Sci, 86, pp.287~298 (2008)[DOI]
- Ramos AM, "Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using snps identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology", PLoS One, 4, pp.e6524~ (2009)[DOI]
- Wiggans GR, "Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and quality of genotypes used in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States and Canada", J Dairy Sci, 92, pp.3431~3436 (2009)[DOI]
- Misztal I, "BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90)", Proceedings of the 7th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, pp.743~744 (2002)
- Christensen OF, "Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped", Genet Sel Evol, 42, pp.2~ (2010)[DOI]
- Aguilar I, "Hot topic : a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score", J Dairy Sci, 93, pp.743~752 (2010)[DOI]
- VanRaden PM, "Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions", J Dairy Sci, 91, pp.4414~4423 (2008)[DOI]
- 최연호, "Genetic Parameters of Pre-adjusted Body Weight Growth and Ultrasound Measures of Body Tissue Development in Three Seedstock Pig Breed Populations in Korea", Animal Bioscience, 28(12), pp.1696~1702 (2015), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- Noguera JL, "Multivariate analysis of litter size for multiple parities with production traits in pigs : I. Bayesian variance component estimation", J Anim Sci, 80, pp.2540~2547 (2002)[DOI]
- Arango J, "Threshold-linear estimation of genetic parameters for farrowing mortality, litter size, and test performance of Large White sows", J Anim Sci, 83, pp.499~506 (2005)[DOI]
- Chen P, "Genetic parameters and trends for lean growth rate and its components in U. S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs", J Anim Sci, 80, pp.2062~2070 (2002)[DOI]
- Suzuki K, "Genetic correlations among fatty acid compositions in different sites of fat tissues, meat production, and meat quality traits in Duroc pigs", J Anim Sci, 84, pp.2026~2034 (2006)[DOI]
- Hicks C, "Effect of sex on estimates of genetic parameters for daily gain and ultrasonic backfat thickness in swine", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 12, pp.677~681 (1999)[DOI]
- Hoque MA, "Genetic parameters for measures of residual feed intake and growth traits in seven generations of Duroc pigs", Livest Sci, 121, pp.45~49 (2009)[DOI]
- Mrode RA, "Genetic variation in measures of food efficiency in pigs and their genetic relationships with growth rate and backfat", Anim Sci, 56, pp.225~232 (1993)[DOI]
- Kadarmideen HN, "Genetics of osteochondral disease and its relationship with meat quality and quantity, growth, and feed conversion traits in pigs", J Anim Sci, 82, pp.3118~3127 (2004)[DOI]
- Do DN, "Genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency and related traits in boars of three pig breeds", J Anim Sci, 91, pp.4069~4079 (2013)[DOI]
- Li X, "Genetic parameters for growth rate and backfat in Canadian Yorkshire, Landrace, Duroc, and Hampshire pigs", J Anim Sci, 72, pp.1450~1454 (1994)[DOI]
- Saintilan R, "Genetics of residual feed intake in growing pigs : relationships with production traits, and nitrogen and phosphorus excretion traits", J Anim Sci, 91, pp.2542~2554 (2013)[DOI]
- Gunsett FC, "Linear index selection to improve traits defined as ratios", J Anim Sci, 59, pp.1185~1193 (1984)[DOI]
- Saintilan R, "Genetic parameters and halothane genotype effect for residual feed intake in Piétrain growing pigs", Livest Sci, 142, pp.203~209 (2011)[DOI]
- Boddicker N, "Effects of ad libitum and restricted feed intake on growth performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake", J Anim Sci, 89, pp.40~51 (2011)[DOI]
- Kennedy BW, "Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake", J Anim Sci, 71, pp.3239~3250 (1993)[DOI]
- Godinho RM, "Genetic correlations between feed efficiency traits, and growth performance and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred pigs", J Anim Sci, 96, pp.817~829 (2018)[DOI]
- Robertson A, "The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient", Biometrics, 15, pp.469~485 (1959)[DOI]
- Sevillano CA, "Effects of alleles in crossbred pigs estimated for genomic prediction depend on their breed-of-origin", BMC Genomics, 19, pp.740~ (2018)[DOI]
- Nakavisut S, "Genetic correlations between the performance of purebred and crossbred pigs", Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, pp.99~102 (2005)
- Godinho RM, "Genetic correlations between feed efficiency traits, and growth performance and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred pigs", J Anim Sci, 96, pp.817~829 (2018)[DOI]
- Grubbs JK, "Divergent genetic selection for residual feed intake impacts mitochondria reactive oxygen species production in pigs", J Anim Sci, 91, pp.2133~2140 (2013)[DOI]
- Colpoys JD, "Effects of genetic selection for residual feed intake on behavioral reactivity of castrated male pigs to novel stimuli tests", Appl Anim Behav Sci, 159, pp.34~40 (2014)[DOI]
- Dunkelberger JR, "Response of pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake to experimental infection with the PRRS virus", Livest Sci, 177, pp.132~141 (2015)[DOI]
