본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

24-Hour blood pressure response to lower dose (30 mg) fimasartan in Korean patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background/Aims: Fimasartan is an angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) which has comparable efficacy and tolerability with other ARBs. The aim of this study was to evaluate 24-hour blood pressure (BP) lowering efficacy and the tolerability of the low dose fimasartan compared with valsartan in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Methods: This study was a phase II, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double- blind, parallel-grouped trial. A total of 75 hypertensive patients, whose mean ambulatory BP monitoring values were ≥ 135/85 mmHg, were randomized to either fimasartan 30 mg or valsartan 80 mg daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the mean 24-hour systolic BP (SBP) values from the baseline and at the week 8. Secondary endpoints included the change in the mean 24-hour diastolic BP values, the daytime and the nighttime mean BP values at week 8, the trough-to-peak (T/P) ratio and the smoothness index. Results: At week 8, the mean 24-hour SBP values significantly decreased in both groups; –10.5 ± 11.9 mmHg (p < 0.0001) in the fimasartan group and –5.5 ± 11.6 mmHg (p = 0.0307) in the valsartan group. The difference between two groups was 4.3 ± 2.9 mmHg but there was no statistical significance (p = 0.1392). The global T/P ratio in the fimasartan 30 mg groups were 0.48 and 0.40 in the valsartan 80 mg group, respectively (p = 0.3411). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were acute pharyngitis and there were no cases of severe AEs. Conclusions: In mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients, low dose (30 mg) fimasartan showed comparable 24-hour BP lowering efficacy compared with valsartan (80 mg). There was no difference in tolerability between two groups.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Fimasartan is an angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) which has comparable efficacy and tolerability with other ARBs. The aim of this study was to evaluate 24-hour blood pressure (BP) lowering efficacy and the tolerability of the low dose fimasartan compared with valsartan in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Methods: This study was a phase II, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double- blind, parallel-grouped trial. A total of 75 hypertensive patients, whose mean ambulatory BP monitoring values were ≥ 135/85 mmHg, were randomized to either fimasartan 30 mg or valsartan 80 mg daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the mean 24-hour systolic BP (SBP) values from the baseline and at the week 8. Secondary endpoints included the change in the mean 24-hour diastolic BP values, the daytime and the nighttime mean BP values at week 8, the trough-to-peak (T/P) ratio and the smoothness index. Results: At week 8, the mean 24-hour SBP values significantly decreased in both groups; –10.5 ± 11.9 mmHg (p < 0.0001) in the fimasartan group and –5.5 ± 11.6 mmHg (p = 0.0307) in the valsartan group. The difference between two groups was 4.3 ± 2.9 mmHg but there was no statistical significance (p = 0.1392). The global T/P ratio in the fimasartan 30 mg groups were 0.48 and 0.40 in the valsartan 80 mg group, respectively (p = 0.3411). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were acute pharyngitis and there were no cases of severe AEs. Conclusions: In mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients, low dose (30 mg) fimasartan showed comparable 24-hour BP lowering efficacy compared with valsartan (80 mg). There was no difference in tolerability between two groups.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Ezzati M, "Rethinking the “diseases of affluence” paradigm: global patterns of nutritional risks in relation to economic development", PLoS Med, 2, pp.e133~ (2005)
  2. Neal B, "Effects of ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other blood-pressure-lowering drugs: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomised trials. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration", Lancet, 356, pp.1955~1964 (2000)
  3. Hae-Young Lee, "Impact of the β-1 adrenergic receptor polymorphism on tolerability and efficacy of bisoprolol therapy in Korean heart failure patients: association between β adrenergic receptor polymorphism and bisoprolol therapy in heart failure (ABBA) study", The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 31(2), pp.277~287 (2016), 대한내과학회[DOI]
  4. James PA, "2014 Evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8)", JAMA, 311, pp.507~520 (2014)
  5. Weber MA, "Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community: a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension", J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 16, pp.14~26 (2014)
  6. Mancia G, "2013 ESH", ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension:the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), 2013, pp.31, 1281~1357
  7. Jang Hoon Lee, "Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers as a first choice in patients with acute myocardial infarction", The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 31(2), pp.267~276 (2016), 대한내과학회[DOI]
  8. 최의근, "Angiotensin Receptor Blocker for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: beyond Blood Pressure Lowering?", Korean Circulation Journal, 46(3), pp.307~308 (2016), 대한심장학회[DOI]
  9. Abraham HM, "The comparative efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases", Drug Saf, 38, pp.33~54 (2015)
  10. Lee HY, "Fimasartan: a new angiotensin receptor blocker", Drugs, 76, pp.1015~1022 (2016)
  11. Lee H, "Ambulatory blood pressure response to once-daily fimasartan:an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator, parallel-group study in Korean patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension", Clin Ther, 35, pp.1337~1349 (2013)
  12. Lee H, "Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily oral fimasartan 20 to 240 mg", d in Korean patients with hypertension: findings from two phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, 2012, pp.34, 1273~1289
  13. Lee SE, "Efficacy and tolerability of fimasartan, a new angiotensin receptor blocker, com-pared with losartan (50", 100 mg): a 12-week, phase III, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose escalation clinical trial with an optional 12-week extension phase in adult Korean patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, 2012, pp.34, 552~568
  14. Rhee MY, "Efficacy of fimasartan", hydrochlorothiazide combination in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled by fimasartan monotherapy, 2015, pp.9, 2847~2854
  15. Park JB, "Safety and efficacy of fimasartan in patients with arterial hypertension (Safe-KanArb study): an open-label observational study", Am J Cardiovasc Drugs, 13, pp.47~56 (2013)
  16. 장성아, "A Novel Angiotensin Type I Receptor Antagonist, Fimasartan, Prevents Doxorubicin-induced Cardiotoxicity in Rats", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 30(5), pp.559~568 (2015), 대한의학회
  17. Kim JW, "Increased systemic exposure of fimasartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, by ketoconazole and rifampicin", J Clin Pharmacol, 53, pp.75~81 (2013)
  18. Lee J, "Pharmacokineticpharmacodynamic model of fimasartan applied to predict the influence of a high fat diet on its blood pressurelowering effect in healthy subjects", Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 69, pp.11~20 (2013)
  19. Chi YH, "Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of fimasartan following single and repeated oral administration in the fasted and fed states in healthy subjects", Am J Cardiovasc Drugs, 11, pp.335~346 (2011)
  20. Shin KH, "The effect of the newly developed angiotensin receptor II antagonist fimasartan on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin in relation to OATP1B1 in healthy male volunteers", J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 58, pp.492~499 (2011)
  21. Kim CO, "Influence of hepatic dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics and safety of fimasartan", J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 62, pp.524~529 (2013)
  22. Lee HW, "Effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of fimasartan (BR-A-657)", Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol, 7, pp.1337~1344 (2011)
  23. Yi S, "Pharmacokinetic interaction of fimasartan, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, with amlodipine in healthy volunteers", J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 57, pp.682~689 (2011)
  24. Jeon H, "Assessment of the drugdrug interactions between fimasartan and hydrochlorothiazide in healthy volunteers", J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 59, pp.84~91 (2012)
  25. Yi S, "Effect of multiple doses of fimasartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy volunteers", Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 49, pp.321~327 (2011)
  26. Youn JC, "Efficacy and safety of 30-mg fimasartan for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical study", Clin Ther, 36, pp.1412~1421 (2014)
  27. Diamant M, "Lisinopril versus enalapril:evaluation of trough:peak ratio by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring", J Hum Hypertens, 13, pp.405~412 (1999)
  28. Staessen JA, "Determining the trough-to-peak ratio in parallel-group trials: Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR) Trial Investigators", Hypertension, 29, pp.659~667 (1997)
  29. Staessen JA, "The troughto-peak ratio as an instrument to evaluate antihypertensive drugs: the APTH Investigators. Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Treatment of Hypertension Trial", Hypertension, 26, pp.942~949 (1995)
  30. Coca A, "Trough-to-peak ratio, smoothness index, and circadian blood pressure profile after treatment with once-daily fixed combination of losartan 100 and hydrochlorothiazide 25 in essential hypertension", J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 39, pp.824~833 (2002)
  31. Parati G, "The smoothness index: a new, reproducible and clinically relevant measure of the homogeneity of the blood pressure reduction with treatment for hypertension", J Hypertens, 16, pp.1685~1691 (1998)
  32. Heran BS, "Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (4), pp.CD003822~ (2008)
  33. Forclaz A, "Angiotensin II receptor blockade: is there truly a benefit of adding an ACE inhibitor?", Hypertension, 41, pp.31~36 (2003)
  34. Young-Il JO, "Effect of low-dose valsartan on proteinuria in normotensive immunoglobulin A nephropathy with minimal proteinuria: a randomized trial", The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 31(2), pp.335~343 (2016), 대한내과학회[DOI]
  35. Israili ZH., "Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension", J Hum Hypertens, 14(Suppl 1), pp.S73~S86 (2000)
  36. Taylor AA, "Angiotensin receptor blockers: pharmacology, efficacy, and safety", J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 13, pp.677~686 (2011)
  37. Morgan T, "Interaction of ACE inhibitors and AT(1)-receptor blockers on maximum blood pressure response in spontaneous hypertensive rats", J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst, 3, pp.16~18 (2002)
  38. Rose M, "Some problems with antihypertensive drug studies in the context of the new guidelines", Am J Hypertens, 3, pp.151~155 (1990)
  39. "Draft guidance: E12A principles for clinical evaluation of new antihypertensive drugs" (2000)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study Determines Factors Affecting Blood Pressure Response to Valsartan박창범, 손일석, 임성빈, 조진만, 진은선, 황희정, Chong Jin Kim, Hui Jin대한고혈압학회 · Clinical Hypertension2012 · 제18권 제3호Effect of a fixed-dose combination of Telmisartan/S-amlodipine on circadian blood pressure compared with Telmisartan monotherapy: TENUVA-BP study권혁문, 김봉준, 김효수, 이남호, 임상엽, 임상욱, 임성훈, 주승재, 최승민, Cho Kyoung Im, Yoon Chang-Hwan대한고혈압학회 · Clinical Hypertension2022 · 제28권 Real-world efficacy of fimasartan vs. other angiotensin receptor blockers in combination with calcium channel blockers: a nationwide cohort studyHan Kyung-Do, Kim Bongseong, Kim Hyung-Kwan, Kim Yong-Jin, Lee Heesun, Lee Huijin, Park Chan Soon, Rhee Tae-Min대한고혈압학회 · Clinical Hypertension2024 · 제30권 Effect of home blood pressure monitoring for blood pressure control in hypertensive patients taking multiple antihypertensive medications including fimasartan (the FORTE study)김광일, 김철호, 최정연대한고혈압학회 · Clinical Hypertension2020 · 제26권 제4호A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III study on the efficacy and safety of a combination treatment involving fimasartan, amlodipine, rosuvastatin in patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia who fail to respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy강태수, 권기환, 김광일, 김무현, 김석연, 김형섭, 성기철, 신진호, 양형모, 이무용, 이해영, 임상욱, 전은석, 정진옥, 한승환, 한은수, 홍그루대한고혈압학회 · Clinical Hypertension2022 · 제28권 본태성 고혈압 환자에서 S-(-)-Amlodipine Nicotinate와 Ramipril의 유효성 및 안정성의 비교 평가강정채, 김계훈, 김민석, 김주한, 박근호, 박종춘, 심두선, 안영근, 윤남식, 윤현주, 이민구, 정명호, 조정관, 홍영준대한고혈압학회 · Clinical Hypertension2011 · 제17권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (27건)