Comparison of liquid-based cytology (CellPrepPlus) and conventional smears in pancreaticobiliary disease
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUSFNA) and brushing cytology are used worldwide to diagnose pancreatic and biliary malignant tumors. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has been developed and it is currently used to overcome the limitations of conventional smears (CS). In this study, the authors aimed to compare the diagnostic value of the CellPrep-Plus (CP; Biodyne) LBC method with CS in samples obtained using EUS-FNA and brushing cytology. Methods: This study prospectively enrolled 75 patients with pancreatic or biliary lesions from June 2012 to October 2013. For cytological analyses, including inadequate specimens, benign and atypical were further classified into benign, and suspicious and malignant were subcategorized as malignant. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were evaluated. Results: In the EUS-FNA based cytological analysis of pancreatic specimens, CP had a sensitivity of 60.7%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 77.1%; PPV, 100%; and NPV, 64.5%. CS had a sensitivity of 85.7%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 91.7%; PPV, 100%; and NPV, 83.3%. In the brushing cytology based analysis of biliary specimens, CP had sensitivity of 53.1%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 54.5%; PPV, 100%; and NPV, 6.3%. CS had a sensitivity of 78.1%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 78.8%; PPV, 100%; and NPV, 12.5%. Conclusions: Our study found that CP had a lower sensitivity because of low cellularity compared with CS. Therefore, CP (LBC) has a lower diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic EUS-FNA based and biliary brush cytology based analyses compared with CS.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUSFNA) and brushing cytology are used worldwide to diagnose pancreatic and biliary malignant tumors. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has been developed and it is currently used to overcome the limitations of conventional smears (CS). In this study, the authors aimed to compare the diagnostic value of the CellPrep-Plus (CP; Biodyne) LBC method with CS in samples obtained using EUS-FNA and brushing cytology. Methods: This study prospectively enrolled 75 patients with pancreatic or biliary lesions from June 2012 to October 2013. For cytological analyses, including inadequate specimens, benign and atypical were further classified into benign, and suspicious and malignant were subcategorized as malignant. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were evaluated. Results: In the EUS-FNA based cytological analysis of pancreatic specimens, CP had a sensitivity of 60.7%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 77.1%; PPV, 100%; and NPV, 64.5%. CS had a sensitivity of 85.7%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 91.7%; PPV, 100%; and NPV, 83.3%. In the brushing cytology based analysis of biliary specimens, CP had sensitivity of 53.1%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 54.5%; PPV, 100%; and NPV, 6.3%. CS had a sensitivity of 78.1%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 78.8%; PPV, 100%; and NPV, 12.5%. Conclusions: Our study found that CP had a lower sensitivity because of low cellularity compared with CS. Therefore, CP (LBC) has a lower diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic EUS-FNA based and biliary brush cytology based analyses compared with CS.
참고문헌 (19)
- 이종균, "췌장암의 스크리닝 및 진단", 대한소화기학회지, 51(2), pp.84~88 (2008), 대한소화기학회
- 동석호, "간문부 담관암의 최근 치료 성적", 대한내과학회지, 79(6), pp.623~629 (2010), 대한내과학회
- Siddiqui MT, "Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in detecting carcinoma in bile duct brushings", Cancer, 99, pp.205~210 (2003)[DOI]
- Qin SY, "Diagnostic efficacy of cell block immunohistochemistry, smear cytology, and liquid-based cytology in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions: a single-institution experience", PLoS One, 9, pp.e108762~ (2014)[DOI]
- Hewitt MJ, "EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.319~331 (2012)[DOI]
- Duggan MA, "ERCP-directed brush cytology prepared by the Thinprep method: test performance and morphology of 149 cases", Cytopathology, 15, pp.80~86 (2004)[DOI]
- Volmar KE, "Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods", Cancer, 108, pp.231~238 (2006)[DOI]
- Mahmoudi N, "Biliary brush cytology: factors associated with positive yields on biliary brush cytology", World J Gastroenterol, 14, pp.569~573 (2008)[DOI]
- 고재수, "자궁경부, 체액 및 소변의 탈락 세포진 검사에서 CellPrep？ 액상세포검사의 세포학적 평가 -ThinPrep？과 비교분석-", 대한세포병리학회지, 18(1), pp.29~35 (2007), 대한세포병리학회
- 이용희, "자궁경부의 액상 세포검사(Liquid Based Cytology)", Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine, 43(4), pp.291~300 (2009), 대한병리학회
- 구지혜, "초음파 유도 갑상샘 세침흡인세포검사에서 CellprepPlus® 액상세포검사: 고식적 도말검사와 CellprepPlus® 액상세포검사와의 비교", Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine, 45(2), pp.182~187 (2011), 대한병리학회
- Lee JK, "A prospective comparison of liquid-based cytology and traditional smear cytology in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration", Acta Cytol, 55, pp.401~407 (2011)[DOI]
- 진소영, "췌담관질환에서 담관 솔질세포검사의 유용성－통상도말과 MonoPrep2TM 액상세포검사의 전향적 비교연구－", 대한세포병리학회지, 17(1), pp.38~45 (2006), 대한세포병리학회
- Stewart CJ, "Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases", J Clin Pathol, 54, pp.449~455 (2001)[DOI]
- 구지혜, "체액 세포검사에서 고식적 세포도말검사와 CellprepPlus 액상세포검사의 세포학적 평가 비교", Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine, 43(5), pp.448~452 (2009), 대한병리학회
- Moriarty AT, "A liquid concept: do classic preparations of body cavity fluid perform differently than ThinPrep cases? Observations from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 132, pp.1716~1718 (2008)
- Campion MB, "Improving cellularity and quality of liquid-based cytology slides processed from pancreatobiliary tract brushings", Diagn Cytopathol, 38, pp.627~632 (2010)[DOI]
- LeBlanc JK, "A prospective study comparing rapid assessment of smears and Thin-Prep for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates", Endoscopy, 42, pp.389~394 (2010)[DOI]
- Lee YM, "Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between CellprepPlus and ThinPrep liquid-based preparations in effusion cytology", Diagn Cytopathol, 42, pp.384~390 (2014)[DOI]